Antonio González-Sarrías1, María Ángeles Núñez-Sánchez2, Rocío García-Villalba2, Francisco A Tomás-Barberán2, Juan Carlos Espín2. 1. Research Group on Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Department of Food Science and Technology, CEBAS-CSIC, Campus de Espinardo, P.O. Box 164, 30100, Murcia, Spain. agsarrias@cebas.csic.es. 2. Research Group on Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Department of Food Science and Technology, CEBAS-CSIC, Campus de Espinardo, P.O. Box 164, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Urolithins, metabolites produced by the gut microbiota from ellagic acid, have been acknowledged with cancer chemopreventive activity. Although urolithin A (Uro-A) has been reported to be the most active one, 10-50 % of humans can also produce the isomer isourolithin A (IsoUro-A). However, no biological activity for IsoUro-A has been reported so far. Herein, we describe for the first time the antiproliferative effect of IsoUro-A, compared to Uro-A, against both human colon cancer (Caco-2) and normal (CCD18-Co) cell lines. METHODS: Cell proliferation was evaluated by MTT and Trypan blue exclusion assays. Cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry and apoptosis measured by the Annexin V/PI method. Finally, urolithins metabolism was analyzed by HPLC-DAD-MS/MS. RESULTS: IsoUro-A inhibited the proliferation of Caco-2 cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner, though it was significantly lower than Uro-A (IC50 = 69.7 ± 4.5 and 49.2 ± 3.8 μM at 48 h, respectively). Both urolithins arrested Caco-2 cell cycle at S and G2/M phases and induced apoptosis at concentrations previously found in human colon tissues. Notably, Caco-2 cells glucuronidated more efficiently IsoUro-A than Uro-A (~50 vs. ~20 % of conversion after 48 h, respectively). Both Uro-A and IsoUro-A glucuronides did not exert antiproliferative effects. In addition, cell growth inhibition was higher in Caco-2 than in normal cells. CONCLUSIONS: IsoUro-A exerts strong antiproliferative activity, which is reduced by the extensive glucuronidation at 9-position in cancer cells. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether the in vitro structure-activity relationship found for Uro-A and IsoUro-A plays any role in humans.
PURPOSE:Urolithins, metabolites produced by the gut microbiota from ellagic acid, have been acknowledged with cancer chemopreventive activity. Although urolithin A (Uro-A) has been reported to be the most active one, 10-50 % of humans can also produce the isomer isourolithin A (IsoUro-A). However, no biological activity for IsoUro-A has been reported so far. Herein, we describe for the first time the antiproliferative effect of IsoUro-A, compared to Uro-A, against both humancolon cancer (Caco-2) and normal (CCD18-Co) cell lines. METHODS: Cell proliferation was evaluated by MTT and Trypan blue exclusion assays. Cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry and apoptosis measured by the Annexin V/PI method. Finally, urolithins metabolism was analyzed by HPLC-DAD-MS/MS. RESULTS:IsoUro-A inhibited the proliferation of Caco-2 cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner, though it was significantly lower than Uro-A (IC50 = 69.7 ± 4.5 and 49.2 ± 3.8 μM at 48 h, respectively). Both urolithins arrested Caco-2 cell cycle at S and G2/M phases and induced apoptosis at concentrations previously found in human colon tissues. Notably, Caco-2 cells glucuronidated more efficiently IsoUro-A than Uro-A (~50 vs. ~20 % of conversion after 48 h, respectively). Both Uro-A and IsoUro-A glucuronides did not exert antiproliferative effects. In addition, cell growth inhibition was higher in Caco-2 than in normal cells. CONCLUSIONS:IsoUro-A exerts strong antiproliferative activity, which is reduced by the extensive glucuronidation at 9-position in cancer cells. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether the in vitro structure-activity relationship found for Uro-A and IsoUro-A plays any role in humans.
Authors: Ana Ramírez de Molina; Teodoro Vargas; Susana Molina; Jenifer Sánchez; Jorge Martínez-Romero; Margarita González-Vallinas; Roberto Martín-Hernández; Ruth Sánchez-Martínez; Marta Gómez de Cedrón; Alberto Dávalos; Luca Calani; Daniele Del Rio; Antonio González-Sarrías; Juan Carlos Espín; Francisco A Tomás-Barberán; Guillermo Reglero Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Antonio González-Sarrías; Joao Tomé-Carneiro; Andrea Bellesia; Francisco A Tomás-Barberán; Juan Carlos Espín Journal: Food Funct Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Antonio González-Sarrías; Verónica Miguel; Gracia Merino; Ricardo Lucas; Juan C Morales; Francisco Tomás-Barberán; Ana I Alvarez; Juan C Espín Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Antonio González-Sarrías; Juan-Carlos Espín; Francisco A Tomás-Barberán; María-Teresa García-Conesa Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: María V Selma; David Beltrán; María C Luna; María Romo-Vaquero; Rocío García-Villalba; Alex Mira; Juan C Espín; Francisco A Tomás-Barberán Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Valentina Spigoni; Pedro Mena; Monia Cito; Federica Fantuzzi; Riccardo C Bonadonna; Furio Brighenti; Alessandra Dei Cas; Daniele Del Rio Journal: Molecules Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 4.411