Literature DB >> 26680567

Comparison of clinical cut-points and treatment targets for urine NTX and plasma βCTX-I in osteoporosis.

S A Paul Chubb1, Christine Mandelt2, Samuel Vasikaran3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We undertook to identify levels for plasma β isomerised carboxy-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (p-βCTX-I) that are comparable to currently used urine amino-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (u-NTX) cut-points and treatment targets in osteoporosis. DESIGN AND METHODS: Fasting morning samples were collected from patients attending tertiary hospitals and clinics for investigation of metabolic bone disease. Patients with Paget's disease or <20years of age were excluded. Second void spot urine for NTX and plasma (EDTA) samples were utilised. Urine was analysed routinely and plasma stored at -20C until analysis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Immunodiagnostic Systems plc), E170 (Roche Diagnostics) and IDS-iSYS (Immunodiagnostic Systems plc) methods. The relationship of u-NTX with each p-βCTX-I method's results was assessed by Passing and Bablok regression, and p-βCTX-I levels equivalent to u-NTX cut-points and targets were interpolated.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty six patients were included. Spearman correlation coefficients ranged from 0.71 to 0.75 for the three βCTX-I assays. The equivalent βCTX-I concentrations for NTX/Cr values of 21 (fracture risk reduction target following risedronate therapy), 27 (healthy pre-menopausal women's mean value), and 38 (threshold for reduction of BMD on calcium alone) nmol BCE/mmol were 230, 312 and 462ng/L for the automated Roche assay and 271, 395 and 624ng/L for the automated IDS i-SYS assay respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The p-βCTX-I equivalent to the only available fracture outcome based absolute treatment threshold of 21nmol BCE/mmol established for u-NTX, is close to 250ng/L but will vary between p-βCTX-I assays.
Copyright © 2015 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiresorptives; Biochemical markers of bone turnover; Bone remodelling; Fracture risk assessment; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26680567     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  3 in total

1.  The use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical management of primary and secondary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Samuel D Vasikaran; S A Paul Chubb
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Osteoporosis in South-East Asian Countries.

Authors:  Subashini C Thambiah; Swan Sim Yeap
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-02

3.  Bone Turnover Status: Classification Model and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Alexander Fisher; Leon Fisher; Wichat Srikusalanukul; Paul N Smith
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.