Literature DB >> 26680514

Patients give meaning to changes in health complaints before, during and after the replacement of amalgam restorations.

Emily Levey1, Susan Carson1, Nicola Innes1.   

Abstract

DESIGN: Qualitative, explorative and reflexive thematic analysis.
METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were carried out with 12 participants who had all taken part in a previous amalgam removal trial. Follow-up; three months and one, three and five years after amalgam restoration removal and replacement. Interviews were carried out by two researchers at a different location from clinical follow-up. Transcripts were analysed by reading through the written material to establish common themes. NVivo9 software was used to assist further organising themes. Themes were then refined and condensed into the presented findings, which included selected quotes.
RESULTS: The authors found the following themes to be important to patients in giving meaning to health complaints before, during and after amalgam removal: Something is not working: betrayed by the body. You are out there on your own. Not being sure of the importance of amalgam removal. The relief experienced after amalgam is removed. To accept, to give up, or to continue the search.
CONCLUSIONS: For this group of patients, it was important to remove dental amalgam restorations. However, it remains uncertain of how critical this actually was in relation to their experienced changes in health complaints, as they did not feel that they could credit all positive change to the amalgam removal. For some participants it meant this was no longer a source of worry and for others it helped them move towards accepting their health status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26680514     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Dent        ISSN: 1462-0049


  4 in total

1.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Qualitative research in dentistry.

Authors:  K Stewart; P Gill; B Chadwick; E Treasure
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.

Authors:  J Kitzinger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-29

4.  Changes in health complaints after removal of amalgam fillings.

Authors:  T T Sjursen; G B Lygre; K Dalen; V Helland; T Laegreid; J Svahn; B F Lundekvam; L Björkman
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.837

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.