Literature DB >> 26680393

Laparoscopic Paravaginal Defect Repair: Surgical Technique and a Literature Review.

Orawee Chinthakanan1, John R Miklos2, Robert D Moore2.   

Abstract

Paravaginal defects, commonly seen in patients with anterior vaginal wall prolapse, are due to the detachment of pubocervical fascia from the arcus tendineus fascia pelvis (ATFP), at or near its lateral attachment. The majority of anterior vaginal wall prolapse is thought to be caused by paravaginal defects. Richardson et al. first described and demonstrated the anatomy of the paravaginal defect, as well as described the initial technique of the abdominal approach to repair. Since that time, the laparoscopic approach for repair has been developed and described with success rates of laparoscopic paravaginal defect repair reported in the range of 60% to 89%. This minimally invasive approach to address anterior wall prolapse eliminates the need for a vaginal incision, reduces risk of vaginal shortening and can be completed at the same time as other laparoscopic procedures, such as hysterectomy, sacralcolpopexy, and/or Burch Urethropexy. Compared to the open abdominal approach, there is improved visualization, less risk of bleeding, and faster recovery with the laparoscopic method. Compared to an anterior colporrhaphy, laparoscopic paravaginal repair is a much more anatomic repair of lateral defects and does not result in vaginal shortening. The laparoscopic paravaginal repair should be considered as the first-line treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse caused by lateral defects, including at time of laparoscopic/robotic sacralcolpopexy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26680393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Technol Int        ISSN: 1090-3941


  3 in total

Review 1.  Native Tissue Repairs for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Justin Houman; James M Weinberger; Karyn S Eilber
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Trans-obturator cystocele repair of level 2 paravaginal defect.

Authors:  Vladimir Kalis; Veronika Kovarova; Zdenek Rusavy; Khaled M Ismail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?

Authors:  Ricardo Palmerola; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.092

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.