Literature DB >> 26680367

[Do we still need clinical studies in rheumatology?].

U Henkemeier1, R Alten2, B Bannert3, X Baraliakos4, F Behrens5, F Heldmann6, U Kiltz4, M Köhm5, R König7, J Leipe8, U Müller-Ladner7, J Rech9, E Riechers10, A Rubbert-Roth11, R E Schmidt10, H Schulze-Koops8, C Specker12, A-K Tausche13, S Wassenberg14, M Witt8, T Witte10, J Zernicke15, H Burkhardt5.   

Abstract

Despite a large number of approved therapies demonstrating efficacy in the treatment of rheumatic diseases, only 60-85 % of patients with the indications for rheumatoid arthritis are adequately treated in Germany. Additionally, approved therapies for other immune-mediated diseases are often entirely lacking, indicating the great medical need for the development of new innovative therapies in this specialized field. The development of new drugs is expensive due to the high costs of conducting clinical trials in all phases of development up to obtaining approval; therefore, pharmaceutical companies are looking for ways to save costs in the particular developmental stages. Although the classical regions for drug development (i.e. western Europe, the USA and Japan) offer both a high level of data quality and a good infrastructure to conduct clinical trials due to high standards of education and quality, clinical trials are expensive in these regions. Beside high costs, the comparatively low recruitment rates in these regions are one of the main reasons for the shifting of drug developmental stages from classical regions to eastern European, Latin American and Asian countries, which provide services for drug development and high recruitment rates for comparatively less money. However, there are many strong arguments for the participation of regions in western Europe, especially German sites in clinical trials. In this article these arguments are discussed and possible solutions and strategies for conducting and compensation of study centers in Germany for clinical trials in the field of rheumatology are provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research; Costs; Funding; Germany; Rheumatoid arthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26680367     DOI: 10.1007/s00393-015-1687-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Rheumatol        ISSN: 0340-1855            Impact factor:   1.372


  3 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis: determinants of onset, persistence and outcome.

Authors:  Deborah P M Symmons
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 2.  The burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Annelies Boonen; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Remission induction comparing infliximab and high-dose intravenous steroid, followed by treat-to-target: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial in new-onset, treatment-naive, rheumatoid arthritis (the IDEA study).

Authors:  J L Nam; E Villeneuve; E M A Hensor; P G Conaghan; H I Keen; M H Buch; A K Gough; M J Green; P S Helliwell; A M Keenan; A W Morgan; M Quinn; R Reece; D M van der Heijde; R J Wakefield; P Emery
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 19.103

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.