Boris Sepesi1, Henner E Schmidt2, Michal Lada3, Arlene M Correa4, Garrett L Walsh4, Reza J Mehran4, David C Rice4, Jack A Roth4, Ara A Vaporciyan4, Jaffer A Ajani5, Thomas J Watson3, Stephen G Swisher4, Donald E Low2, Wayne L Hofstetter4. 1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: sepesi@mdanderson.org. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington. 3. Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. 4. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 5. Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual 7th Edition esophageal cancer staging was derived from outcomes of patients undergoing esophagectomy alone and eliminated nodal location from its schema. A limitation of this staging system is that it has not been validated in the setting of multimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. In addition, nodal location continues to influence treatment decisions. The aim of our study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma undergoing trimodality therapy and assess the effect of nodal location on survival. METHODS: This multiinstitutional retrospective study assessed patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) distal esophageal/GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with trimodality therapy between January 2002 and December 2011. Nodal stations were classified as paratracheal, subcarinal, celiac, lower esophageal, paraaortic, supraclavicular, or perigastric/perihepatic. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with OS. RESULTS: A total of 196 cN+ patients met the study criteria. The most prevalent metastatic nodal location was in the perigastric region, present in 141 patients (72%); paratracheal nodal involvement was present in 19 patients (10%). None of the nodal stations was significantly associated with OS on univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis identified age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.036; p = 0.001), male sex (HR, 2.39; p = 0.003), pathologic ypT3 (HR, 1.81; p = 0.048), and ypN3 (HR, 2.93; p = 0.003) as being significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: The location of cN+ regional node disease in patients with distal esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma was not predictive of survival after trimodality therapy. Age, sex, pathologic tumor depth, and the number of involved nodes were independent predictors of survival. Patients with cN+ cancers should not be deprived of potentially curative surgical resection based solely on the location of regional nodal disease.
BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual 7th Edition esophageal cancer staging was derived from outcomes of patients undergoing esophagectomy alone and eliminated nodal location from its schema. A limitation of this staging system is that it has not been validated in the setting of multimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. In addition, nodal location continues to influence treatment decisions. The aim of our study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma undergoing trimodality therapy and assess the effect of nodal location on survival. METHODS: This multiinstitutional retrospective study assessed patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) distal esophageal/GEJ adenocarcinoma treated with trimodality therapy between January 2002 and December 2011. Nodal stations were classified as paratracheal, subcarinal, celiac, lower esophageal, paraaortic, supraclavicular, or perigastric/perihepatic. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with OS. RESULTS: A total of 196 cN+ patients met the study criteria. The most prevalent metastatic nodal location was in the perigastric region, present in 141 patients (72%); paratracheal nodal involvement was present in 19 patients (10%). None of the nodal stations was significantly associated with OS on univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis identified age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.036; p = 0.001), male sex (HR, 2.39; p = 0.003), pathologic ypT3 (HR, 1.81; p = 0.048), and ypN3 (HR, 2.93; p = 0.003) as being significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: The location of cN+ regional node disease in patients with distal esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma was not predictive of survival after trimodality therapy. Age, sex, pathologic tumor depth, and the number of involved nodes were independent predictors of survival. Patients with cN+ cancers should not be deprived of potentially curative surgical resection based solely on the location of regional nodal disease.
Authors: E C de Heer; J B Hulshoff; D Klerk; J G M Burgerhof; D J A de Groot; J Th M Plukker; G A P Hospers Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 5.344