Literature DB >> 26679827

Examining the barriers to meaningful assessment and feedback in medical training.

Sydney A McQueen1, Bradley Petrisor2, Mohit Bhandari2, Christine Fahim2, Victoria McKinnon2, Ranil R Sonnadara3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports from both accreditation bodies in North America highlight problems with current assessment practices in postgraduate medical training. Previous work has shown that educators might be reluctant to report poor performance or fail underperforming trainees. This study explores the barriers perceived by medical educators to providing more meaningful assessment and feedback to trainees.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 physician educators. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Three researchers analyzed the transcripts using a grounded theory approach.
RESULTS: Participants expressed a reluctance to provide poor assessments or feedback to trainees. Fifty-five percent of the participants reported passing trainees who could have benefited from additional training. Our data revealed a number of barriers which may account for these findings. Implementing more frequent formative assessments could help educators more effectively evaluate trainees and provide feedback, although a shift in the culture of medicine may be required.
CONCLUSION: It is imperative that the barriers to effective assessment and feedback identified in this study be addressed to improve postgraduate medical training and enhance patient care.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Feedback; Postgraduate medical education; Residency; Surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26679827     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  Leadership-Specific Feedback Practices in Surgical Residency: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Calista M Harbaugh; Ana C De Roo; Ben E Biesterveld; Paul G Gauger; Justin B Dimick; Gurjit Sandhu
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  myTIPreport and Training for Independent Practice: A Tool for Real-Time Workplace Feedback for Milestones and Procedural Skills.

Authors:  AnnaMarie Connolly; Alice Goepfert; Anita Blanchard; Elizabeth Buys; Nicole Donnellan; Cindy L Amundsen; Shelley L Galvin; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-02

3.  Point-of-Encounter Assessment: Using Health Belief Model Constructs to Change Grading Behaviors.

Authors:  Susan F McLean; Maureen Francis; Naomi L Lacy; Andres Alvarado
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2019-04-30

4.  Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers.

Authors:  Lynn E Jaffe; Deborah Lindell; Amy M Sullivan; Grace C Huang
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-10

5.  How are formative assessment methods used in the clinical setting? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Pernille Andreassen; Bente Malling
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2019-11-22

6.  Adult Gastroenterology Trainees' Experience of Receiving Feedback on Their Performance of Endoscopy in the Workplace.

Authors:  Julien-Carl Phaneuf; Dawn Wood
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-21

7.  A data-driven performance dashboard for surgical dissection.

Authors:  Amir Baghdadi; Sanju Lama; Rahul Singh; Hamidreza Hoshyarmanesh; Mohammadsaleh Razmi; Garnette R Sutherland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.