Literature DB >> 26679496

Challenge to pediatric anatomical variation : Can we draw the ideal line on the pediatric I-gel?

Yukako Abukawa1, Koichi Hiroki2,3, Hiroko Iwakiri2, Tomoko Fukada2, Makoto Ozaki2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: I-gel is a noncuff type of laryngeal airway mask. No horizontal line has yet been determined as an ideal position for pediatric sizes because of the variability in length of the oropharyngeal-laryngeal arch in children. We investigated whether there is a correlation between insertion length and patient body weight or height for the pediatric I-gel sizes from 1.5 to 2.5.
METHODS: With parental informed consent, we planned to maintain the airway of 130 children aged from 7 months to 13 years by using the I-gel device under general anesthesia. The following two parameters were evaluated: (1) distance between the teeth and the connector wing; (2) insertion length (distance from the distal end of the gastric tube to the teeth). Size selection was determined on the basis of patients' body weight. We identified the relationship between each parameter and height or weight.
RESULTS: Average insertion length became gradually longer with increasing height and weight. Spearman's R between insertion length and height or weight was 0.8. There was more correlation with height than with weight in pediatric size 2.5.
CONCLUSION: Results suggested that it is possible to draw an ideal line on the I-gel with sizes 1.5 and 2 only.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical variability; I-gel; Laryngeal mask; Pediatric

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26679496     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-015-2108-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  12 in total

1.  The use of the laryngeal mask airway in pediatric anesthesia.

Authors:  K Miyasaka; Y Suzuki; Y Kondo; H Sakai; S Nakagawa; S Asahara
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Initial experience of the i-gel supraglottic airway by the residents in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Yukako Abukawa; Koichi Hiroki; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in anaesthetized human volunteers.

Authors:  S G Russo; S Cremer; C Eich; M Jipp; J Cohnen; M Strack; M Quintel; A Mohr
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 4.  Laryngeal mask airway: uses in anesthesiology.

Authors:  M Pinosky
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 5.  Evaluation of i-gel(™) airway in children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Souvik Maitra; Dalim K Baidya; Sulagna Bhattacharjee; Puneet Khanna
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.556

6.  A clinical evaluation of the I-gel ™ supraglottic airway device in children.

Authors:  Corinna Hughes; Kelly Place; Simon Berg; David Mason
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.556

Review 7.  The laryngeal mask airway. Its uses in anesthesiology.

Authors:  J H Pennant; P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  The i-gel(™) - A promising airway device for magnetic resonance imaging suite.

Authors:  Susheela Taxak; Mamta Bhardwaj; Ajith Gopinath
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04

9.  Performance of size 1 I-gel compared with size 1 ProSeal laryngeal mask in anesthetized infants and neonates.

Authors:  Gulay Erdogan Kayhan; Zekine Begec; Mukadder Sanli; Ender Gedik; Mahmut Durmus
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-02-22

10.  A clinical evaluation of the pediatric i-gel™ for airway management during MRI examination.

Authors:  Ruggero M Corso; Daniele Battelli; Stefano Maitan; Salvatore Zampone; Vanni Agnoletti
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing I-Gel to Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Study.

Authors:  Sibel Oba; Hacer Şebnem Türk; Leyla Kılınç; Birsen Ekşioğlu Karacı; Serkan İslamoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2019-11-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.