Literature DB >> 26679431

ISO 12189 standard for the preclinical evaluation of posterior spinal stabilization devices--I: Assembly procedure and validation.

Luigi La Barbera1, Tomaso Villa2.   

Abstract

The International Standardization Organization introduced standard 12189 for the preclinical evaluation of the mechanical reliability of posterior stabilization devices. The well-known vertebrectomy model formalized in standard F1717 by the American Society for Testing and Materials was modified with the introduction of a modular anterior support made up of three calibrated springs, which allows to describe a more realistic scenario, closer to the effective clinical use, as well to test even very flexible and dynamic posterior stabilization implants. Despite these important improvements, ISO 12189 received very little attention in the literature. The aim of the work is to provide a systematic procedure for the assembly and validation of a finite element model capable of describing the experimental test according to ISO 12189. The validated finite element model is able to catch very well the effective stiffness of the unassembled and assembled constructs (percentage differences <2% and <10%, respectively). As concern the assembled construct, the experimentally measured and predicted strains were found in a good agreement (R2 > 0.75, root mean square error < 30%), but the procedure without precompression lead to much better results (R2 > 0.96, root mean square error < 10%). Given the prediction errors of the assembled construct fall within the experimental range of repeatability, the finite element model can be systematically implemented to support the mechanical design of a variety of spinal implants, to quantitatively investigate the load-sharing mechanism, as well as to investigate the loading conditions set by ISO 12189 standard. © IMechE 2015.

Keywords:  ASTM F1717; ISO 10243; ISO 12189; axial compression; fatigue; finite element; load sharing; pedicle screw; preclinical evaluation; spine stabilization; standard; strain gauges; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26679431     DOI: 10.1177/0954411915621587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  10 in total

1.  Biomechanical in vitro comparison between anterior column realignment and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe sagittal imbalance correction.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evaluation of iliac screw, S2 alar-iliac screw and laterally placed triangular titanium implants for sacropelvic fixation in combination with posterior lumbar instrumentation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Scott Yerby; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can the current standards represent basic everyday life activities?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can we compare in vitro and in vivo loads on the instrumentation?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  S2 alar-iliac screw versus traditional iliac screw for spinopelvic fixation: a systematic review of comparative biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Takashi Hirase; Caleb Shin; Jeremiah Ling; Brian Phelps; Varan Haghshenas; Comron Saifi; Darrell S Hanson
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  Clinically relevant finite element technique based protocol to evaluate growing rods for early onset scoliosis correction.

Authors:  Niloufar Shekouhi; David Dick; Maxwell William Baechle; Dilpreet Kaur Kaeley; Vijay K Goel; Hassan Serhan; Jeremy Rawlinson; Derek Shaw
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-08-21

7.  Biomechanical advantages of supplemental accessory and satellite rods with and without interbody cages implantation for the stabilization of pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Stent-Screw Assisted Internal Fixation of Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Comparative Finite Element Analysis on SAIF Technique.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Alessandro Cianfoni; Andrea Ferrari; Daniela Distefano; Giuseppe Bonaldi; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-25

9.  Load-sharing biomechanics of lumbar fixation and fusion with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Maria Luisa Ruspi; Marco Palanca; Christian Liebsch; Andrea Luca; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Fabio Galbusera; Luca Cristofolini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Biomechanical Effects of Pedicle Screw Positioning on the Surgical Segment in Models After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An in-silico Study.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Chenyi Huang; Ping Cai; Zhongxin Fang; Zhangchao Wei; Fei Liu; Jingchi Li; Yang Liu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-02-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.