Literature DB >> 26678659

Online Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy: First Clinical Applications.

Sahaja Acharya1, Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck1, Rojano Kashani1, Parag Parikh1, Deshan Yang1, Tianyu Zhao1, Olga Green1, Omar Wooten1, H Harold Li1, Yanle Hu1, Vivian Rodriguez1, Lindsey Olsen1, Clifford Robinson1, Jeff Michalski1, Sasa Mutic1, Jeffrey Olsen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR) image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) through reporting of our initial clinical experience and workflow considerations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The first clinically deployed online adaptive MR-IGRT system consisted of a split 0.35T MR scanner straddling a ring gantry with 3 multileaf collimator-equipped (60)Co heads. The unit is supported by a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system that allows real-time adaptive planning with the patient on the table. All patients undergo computed tomography and MR imaging (MRI) simulation for initial treatment planning. A volumetric MRI scan is acquired for each patient at the daily treatment setup. Deformable registration is performed using the planning computed tomography data set, which allows for the transfer of the initial contours and the electron density map to the daily MRI scan. The deformed electron density map is then used to recalculate the original plan on the daily MRI scan for physician evaluation. Recontouring and plan reoptimization are performed when required, and patient-specific quality assurance (QA) is performed using an independent in-house software system.
RESULTS: The first online adaptive MR-IGRT treatments consisted of 5 patients with abdominopelvic malignancies. The clinical setting included neoadjuvant colorectal (n=3), unresectable gastric (n=1), and unresectable pheochromocytoma (n=1). Recontouring and reoptimization were deemed necessary for 3 of 5 patients, and the initial plan was deemed sufficient for 2 of the 5 patients. The reasons for plan adaptation included tumor progression or regression and a change in small bowel anatomy. In a subsequently expanded cohort of 170 fractions (20 patients), 52 fractions (30.6%) were reoptimized online, and 92 fractions (54.1%) were treated with an online-adapted or previously adapted plan. The median time for recontouring, reoptimization, and QA was 26 minutes.
CONCLUSION: Online adaptive MR-IGRT has been successfully implemented with planning and QA workflow suitable for routine clinical application. Clinical trials are in development to formally evaluate adaptive treatments for a variety of disease sites.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26678659     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  81 in total

1.  New concept on an integrated interior magnetic resonance imaging and medical linear accelerator system for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Zhen Tian; Yan Xi; Steve B Jiang; Ge Wang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-02

Review 2.  MR-guided radiation therapy: transformative technology and its role in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Chia-Lin Tseng; James M Balter; Feifei Teng; Hemant A Parmar; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Large field of view distortion assessment in a low-field MR-linac.

Authors:  Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Joshua P Kim; Dongsu Du; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy (MRIgRT): A 4.5-Year Clinical Experience.

Authors:  L E Henke; J A Contreras; O L Green; B Cai; H Kim; M C Roach; J R Olsen; B Fischer-Valuck; D F Mullen; R Kashani; M A Thomas; J Huang; I Zoberi; D Yang; V Rodriguez; J D Bradley; C G Robinson; P Parikh; S Mutic; J Michalski
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.126

6.  Simulated Online Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Disease of the Abdomen and Central Thorax: Characterization of Potential Advantages.

Authors:  Lauren Henke; Rojano Kashani; Deshan Yang; Tianyu Zhao; Olga Green; Lindsey Olsen; Vivian Rodriguez; H Omar Wooten; H Harold Li; Yanle Hu; Jeffrey Bradley; Clifford Robinson; Parag Parikh; Jeff Michalski; Sasa Mutic; Jeffrey R Olsen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Paired cycle-GAN-based image correction for quantitative cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Joseph Harms; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Rongxiao Zhang; Jun Zhou; Xiangyang Tang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Markerless Pancreatic Tumor Target Localization Enabled By Deep Learning.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Liyue Shen; Bin Han; Yong Yang; Kai Cheng; Diego A S Toesca; Albert C Koong; Daniel T Chang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Practical Clinical Workflows for Online and Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Olga L Green; Lauren E Henke; Geoffrey D Hugo
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 10.  Online daily adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Francesca Albertini; Michael Matter; Lena Nenoff; Ye Zhang; Antony Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.