Peter Kletting1, Thomas Kull2, Christian Maaß3, Noeen Malik2, Markus Luster4, Ambros J Beer2, Gerhard Glatting3. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany peter.kletting@uniklinik-ulm.de. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. 3. Medical Radiation Physics/Radiation Protection, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; and. 4. Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: In peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with (90)Y-labeled DOTATATE, the kidney absorbed dose limits the maximum amount of total activity that can be safely administered in many patients. A higher tumor-to-kidney absorbed dose ratio might be achieved by optimizing the amount of injected peptide and activity, as recent studies have shown different degrees of receptor saturation for normal tissue and tumor. The aim of this work was to develop and implement a modeling method for treatment planning to determine the optimal combination of peptide amount and pertaining therapeutic activity for each patient. METHODS: A whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed. General physiologic parameters were taken from the literature. Individual model parameters were fitted to a series (n= 12) of planar γ-camera and serum measurements ((111)In-DOTATATE) of patients with meningioma or neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Using the PBPK model and the individually estimated parameters, we determined the tumor, liver, spleen, and red marrow biologically effective doses (BEDs) for a maximal kidney BED (20 Gy2.5) for different peptide amounts and activities. The optimal combination of peptide amount and activity for maximal tumor BED, considering the additional constraint of a red marrow BED less than 1 Gy15, was individually quantified. RESULTS: The PBPK model describes the biokinetic data well considering the criteria of visual inspection, the coefficients of determination, the relative standard errors (<50%), and the correlation of the parameters (<0.8). All fitted parameters were in a physiologically reasonable range but varied considerably between patients, especially tumor perfusion (meningioma, 0.1-1 mL·g(-1)·min(-1), and NETs, 0.02-1 mL·g(-1)·min(-1)) and receptor density (meningioma, 5-34 nmol·L(-1), and NETs, 7-35 nmol·L(-1)). Using the proposed method, we identified the optimal amount and pertaining activity to be 76 ± 46 nmol (118 ± 71 μg) and 4.2 ± 1.8 GBq for meningioma and 87 ± 50 nmol (135 ± 78 μg) and 5.1 ± 2.8 GBq for NET patients. CONCLUSION: The presented work suggests that to achieve higher efficacy and safety for (90)Y-DOATATE therapy, both the administered amount of peptide and the activity should be optimized in treatment planning using the proposed method. This approach could also be adapted for therapy with other peptides.
UNLABELLED: In peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with (90)Y-labeled DOTATATE, the kidney absorbed dose limits the maximum amount of total activity that can be safely administered in many patients. A higher tumor-to-kidney absorbed dose ratio might be achieved by optimizing the amount of injected peptide and activity, as recent studies have shown different degrees of receptor saturation for normal tissue and tumor. The aim of this work was to develop and implement a modeling method for treatment planning to determine the optimal combination of peptide amount and pertaining therapeutic activity for each patient. METHODS: A whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed. General physiologic parameters were taken from the literature. Individual model parameters were fitted to a series (n= 12) of planar γ-camera and serum measurements ((111)In-DOTATATE) of patients with meningioma or neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Using the PBPK model and the individually estimated parameters, we determined the tumor, liver, spleen, and red marrow biologically effective doses (BEDs) for a maximal kidney BED (20 Gy2.5) for different peptide amounts and activities. The optimal combination of peptide amount and activity for maximal tumor BED, considering the additional constraint of a red marrow BED less than 1 Gy15, was individually quantified. RESULTS: The PBPK model describes the biokinetic data well considering the criteria of visual inspection, the coefficients of determination, the relative standard errors (<50%), and the correlation of the parameters (<0.8). All fitted parameters were in a physiologically reasonable range but varied considerably between patients, especially tumor perfusion (meningioma, 0.1-1 mL·g(-1)·min(-1), and NETs, 0.02-1 mL·g(-1)·min(-1)) and receptor density (meningioma, 5-34 nmol·L(-1), and NETs, 7-35 nmol·L(-1)). Using the proposed method, we identified the optimal amount and pertaining activity to be 76 ± 46 nmol (118 ± 71 μg) and 4.2 ± 1.8 GBq for meningioma and 87 ± 50 nmol (135 ± 78 μg) and 5.1 ± 2.8 GBq for NET patients. CONCLUSION: The presented work suggests that to achieve higher efficacy and safety for (90)Y-DOATATE therapy, both the administered amount of peptide and the activity should be optimized in treatment planning using the proposed method. This approach could also be adapted for therapy with other peptides.
Authors: C Chiesa; K Sjogreen Gleisner; G Flux; J Gear; S Walrand; K Bacher; U Eberlein; E P Visser; N Chouin; M Ljungberg; M Bardiès; M Lassmann; L Strigari; M W Konijnenberg Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Kyle Current; Catherine Meyer; Clara E Magyar; Christine E Mona; Joel Almajano; Roger Slavik; Andreea D Stuparu; Chloe Cheng; David W Dawson; Caius G Radu; Johannes Czernin; Katharina Lueckerath Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christian Maaß; Jan Philipp Sachs; Deni Hardiansyah; Felix M Mottaghy; Peter Kletting; Gerhard Glatting Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Jonathan I Gear; Maurice G Cox; Johan Gustafsson; Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner; Iain Murray; Gerhard Glatting; Mark Konijnenberg; Glenn D Flux Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Song Xue; Andrei Gafita; Chao Dong; Yu Zhao; Giles Tetteh; Bjoern H Menze; Sibylle Ziegler; Wolfgang Weber; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Axel Rominger; Matthias Eiber; Kuangyu Shi Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Peter Kletting; Christiane Schuchardt; Harshad R Kulkarni; Mostafa Shahinfar; Aviral Singh; Gerhard Glatting; Richard P Baum; Ambros J Beer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nouran R R Zaid; Peter Kletting; Gordon Winter; Vikas Prasad; Ambros J Beer; Gerhard Glatting Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 6.321