Literature DB >> 26678526

Pancreatic enucleation using the da Vinci robotic surgical system: a report of 26 cases.

Yusheng Shi1, Chenghong Peng1, Baiyong Shen1, Xiaxing Deng1, Jiabin Jin1, Zhichong Wu1, Qian Zhan1, Hongwei Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a tissue-sparing procedure, pancreatic enucleation has become an alternative for benign or borderline pancreatic tumours; it has been proved to be safe and feasible. To date, a large sample size of robotic pancreatic enucleation has not been reported. This study aimed to discuss the clinical evaluation and postoperative complications after robotic pancreatic enucleation and compare it with open surgery.
METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic or open pancreatic enucleation during December 2010-December 2014 at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, affiliated with the Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine in China, were included. Clinical data were collected and analysed.
RESULTS: Patients were divided into an open group and a robotic group: 26 patients underwent robotic pancreatic enucleation, of whom 13 patients were female. The mean age was 51.7 years, the operation time was 125.7 ± 58.8 min, blood loss was 49.4 ± 33.4 ml and mean tumour size was 18.8 ± 7.9 mm; 17 patients underwent open pancreatic enucleation, of whom 11 were female. The mean age was 54.6 ± 17.2 min, blood loss was 198.5 ± 70.7 ml and mean tumour size was 3.5 ± 1.9 cm. Pathology included insulinomas, intrapancreatic mucinous neoplasmas (IPMNs), pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumours (PNETs), solid pseudopapillary tumours (SPTs) and serous cystadenomas (SCAs). Robotic pancreatic enucleations were associated with less trauma, shorter operation time, less blood loss and faster wound recovery compared with open pancreatic enucleation. Pancreatic fistulas (PFs) were the main complication that occurred in the robotic group; infection also occurred in the open group. All patients recovered after effective drainage and the use of somatostatin. The mean follow-up time was 25 months. No recurrence was discovered, and one patient in the open group suffered endocrine insufficiency.
CONCLUSION: Robotic pancreatic enucleation is a safe and effective surgical procedure for pancreatic benign and borderline tumours. It produces less trauma than open pancreatic enucleation and might extend the indications for enucleation. The PF rate after surgery is still high and a long-term follow-up needs to be performed.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enucleation; pancreatic fistula; robotic surgical system

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26678526     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  5 in total

Review 1.  Robotic enucleation of benign pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Ore; Courtney E Barrows; Monica Solis-Velasco; Jessica Shaker; A James Moser
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-10-28

2.  Robotic Single-Site Plus One Port: Pancreas Enucleation.

Authors:  Jae Uk Chong; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Robotic enucleations of pancreatic benign or low-grade malignant tumors: preliminary results and comparison with robotic demolitive resections.

Authors:  Ilenia Bartolini; Lapo Bencini; Marco Bernini; Marco Farsi; Massimo Calistri; Mario Annecchiarico; Luca Moraldi; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic versus standard open pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis comparison.

Authors:  Benedetto Ielpo; Riccardo Caruso; Hipolito Duran; Eduardo Diaz; Isabel Fabra; Luis Malavé; Yolanda Quijano; Emilio Vicente
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-03-26

Review 5.  Current Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: From Demolitive Surgery to Observation.

Authors:  Ilenia Bartolini; Lapo Bencini; Matteo Risaliti; Maria Novella Ringressi; Luca Moraldi; Antonio Taddei
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-07-22       Impact factor: 2.260

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.