Literature DB >> 26678462

Clinically Important Difference in Quality of Recovery Scores.

Paul S Myles1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2016        PMID： 26678462     DOI： 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN： 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcomes after cryoballoon ablation are equivalent between moderate sedation and general anesthesia.

Authors:  Jeremiah Wasserlauf; Rachel M Kaplan; David R Walega; Rishi Arora; Alexandru B Chicos; Susan S Kim; Albert C Lin; Nishant Verma; Kaustubha D Patil; Bradley P Knight; Rod S Passman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  The Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery Scale Adapted for Use in a Mobile App: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Ulrica Nilsson; Karuna Dahlberg; Maria Jaensson
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  The effect of intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine on quality of recovery in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M V Koning; R de Vlieger; A J W Teunissen; M Gan; E J Ruijgrok; J C de Graaff; J S H A Koopman; R J Stolker
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Impact of analgesic techniques on early quality of recovery after prostatectomy: A 3-arm, randomized trial.

Authors:  Christian M Beilstein; Markus Huber; Marc A Furrer; Lukas M Löffel; Patrick Y Wuethrich; Dominique Engel
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 3.651

5.  Bilateral cervical plexus block for anterior cervical spine surgery: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Mulcahy; Thananchayan Elalingam; Kevin Jang; Mario D'Souza; Matthew Tait
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.279
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.