Literature DB >> 26678446

Problems, Solutions, and Strategies Reported by Users of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Qualitative Exploration Using Patient Interviews.

Peter William Gladwell1, Kathryn Badlan2, Fiona Cramp3, Shea Palmer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) could offer a non-drug form of pain relief, but there is no consensus regarding its effectiveness for chronic musculoskeletal pain or chronic low back pain. A recent review of previous trial methods identified significant problems with low treatment fidelity. There is little information available to inform the development of a pragmatic implementation design for a TENS evaluation.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of patients who were receiving secondary care in a pain clinic and who had expertise in using TENS to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. These key informants were selected because they had the potential to generate knowledge that could inform research design and clinical practice.
DESIGN: A qualitative method using individual semistructured interviews with open questions was selected for its capacity to generate rich data.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 9 patients (6 women, 3 men). Thematic analysis was used as the primary data analysis method, and this analysis was enhanced by a case-level analysis of the context and processes of TENS use of each individual.
RESULTS: Data analysis indicated that patients learned to address a range of problems in order to optimize TENS use. Patients may need to personalize the positioning of electrodes and the TENS settings and to readjust them over time. Patients learned to use TENS in a strategic manner, and the outcomes of each strategy varied.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicated that a pragmatic TENS evaluation may need to incorporate a learning phase to allow patients to optimize this complex pattern of TENS usage, and evaluation may need to be sensitive to the outcomes of strategic use. These findings also have implications for clinical practice.
© 2016 American Physical Therapy Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26678446     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20150272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  9 in total

Review 1.  Does TENS Reduce the Intensity of Acute and Chronic Pain? A Comprehensive Appraisal of the Characteristics and Outcomes of 169 Reviews and 49 Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf; Gareth Jones; Mark I Johnson
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 2.  Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf; Matthew R Mulvey; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.948

3.  An assessment of sensory sensitivity in women suffering from depression using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Joanna Witkoś; Agnieszka Fusińska-Korpik; Magdalena Hartman-Petrycka; Agnieszka Nowak
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 4.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Leica S Claydon; G Peter Herbison; Gareth Jones; Carole A Paley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-09

5.  Noninvasive neuromodulation reduces symptoms of restless legs syndrome.

Authors:  Mark J Buchfuhrer; Fiona C Baker; Haramandeep Singh; Viktoriia Kolotovska; Bahman Adlou; Harnadar Anand; Massimiliano de Zambotti; Mehvish Ismail; Shriram Raghunathan; Jonathan D Charlesworth
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.324

6.  Study protocol randomised controlled trial comparison of cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of a face-to-face rehabilitation programme versus a telemedicine programme in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Adelaida M Castro-Sanchez; Guillermo Adolfo Matarán-Peñarrocha; Silvia Gómez-García; Héctor García-López; Lazaro Andronis; Manuel Albornoz-Cabello; Inmaculada C Lara Palomo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Resolving Long-Standing Uncertainty about the Clinical Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to Relieve Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Factors Influencing Outcome.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Foundational Research Could Improve Future Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Evaluations.

Authors:  Peter W Gladwell; Fiona Cramp; Shea Palmer
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.430

9.  Randomized study of the impact of a therapeutic education program on patients suffering from chronic low-back pain who are treated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Thomas Garaud; Christine Gervais; Barbara Szekely; Mireille Michel-Cherqui; Jean-François Dreyfus; Marc Fischler
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.