| Literature DB >> 26678309 |
Yuichi Nozaki1,2, Koji Fujita3, Koichiro Wada4, Masato Yoneda5, Yoshiyasu Shinohara6, Kento Imajo7, Yuji Ogawa8, Takaomi Kessoku9, Makoto Nakamuta10, Satoru Saito11, Naohiko Masaki12, Yoji Nagashima13,14, Yasuo Terauchi15, Atsushi Nakajima16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although many factors and molecules that are closely associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) have been reported, the role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS)-derived nitric oxide (NO) in the pathogenesis of NAFLD/NASH remains unclear. We therefore investigated the role of eNOS-derived NO in NAFLD pathogenesis using systemic eNOS-knockout mice fed a high-fat diet.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26678309 PMCID: PMC4683865 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-015-0409-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Histological Scores of Livers using the NAFLD activity score (NAS)11)
| 12-week model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Definition | Score |
|
|
|
|
| BD | BD | HFD | HFD | |||
| Steatosis | ||||||
| Grade | Parenchymal involvement | |||||
| <5 % | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5%-33 % | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | |
| 33%-66 % | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | |
| >66 % | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Average | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.25* | 1.75§ | ||
| Inflammation | ||||||
| Lobular inflammation | Assessment of all inflammatory foci | |||||
| No foci | 0 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 1 | |
| <2 foci per 200 × field | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | |
| 2-4 foci per 200 × field | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| >4 foci per 200 × field | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Liver cell injury | Ballooning | |||||
| None | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Few balloon cells | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | |
| Many cells/prominent ballooning | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Average | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.38* | 1.88§ | ||
| Fibrosis | ||||||
| Stage | Method of Brunt | |||||
| None | 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| Perivenular/perisinusoidal fibrosis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Combine pericellular portal fibrosis | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Septal/bridging fibrosis | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cirrhosis | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Average | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
BD basal diet, HFD high fat diet
Significant differences exist between *eNOS+/+ and BD vs. eNOS+/+ and HFD; §eNOS+/+ and HFD vs. eNOS-/- and HFD for listed parameters at the P < .05 level
Primer sequences used for real-time PCR analysis
| Gene | Primer sense | Primer antisense |
|---|---|---|
| SREBP-1c | CAGCTATTGGCCTTCCTCAG | CCTGGACCATTTTAGCCTCA |
| PPAR-α | GTCCTCAGTGCTTCCAGAGG | GGTCACCTACGAGTGGCATT |
| nNOS | TCCTAAATCCAGCCGATCGA | TCATGGTTGCCAGGGAAGAC |
| iNOS | AGAGAGATCCGATTTAGAGTCTTGGT | TGACCCGTGAAGCCATGAC |
Characteristics of mice in the 12-week model
| 12-week model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of animals | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Body weight (g) | 28.1 ± 1.9 | 27.2 ± 2.4 | 42.8 ± 3.1* | 41.7 ± 2.4 |
| Liver weight (g) | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.6* | 2.8 ± 0.5§ |
| Visceral fat weight (g) | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.3* | 1.2 ± 0.3§ |
| Liver weight/body weight ratio (%) | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 5.2 ± 1.0* | 6.7 ± 1.0§ |
| Visceral fat weight/body weight ratio (%) | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 1.0 | 4.7 ± 1.0* | 3.0 ± 0.6§ |
| Serum ALT (IU/L) | 9.2 ± 0.8 | 17.5 ± 9.3 | 74.8 ± 41.4* | 172.8 ± 58.2§ |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | 89.6 ± 8.0 | 85.7 ± 20.6 | 151.8 ± 36.4* | 135.8 ± 32.3 |
| Fasting insulin (ng/mL) | 0.72 ± 0.41 | 0.57 ± 0.72 | 1.63 ± 0.81* | 2.10 ± 0.74 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.9 ± 1.8 | 2.0 ± 2.5 | 11.0 ± 6.7* | 13.3 ± 6.6 |
| Serum cholesterol (mg/dL) | 90.5 ± 3.8 | 85.1 ± 4.9 | 174.8 ± 22.9* | 263.0 ± 28.5§ |
| Serum TG (mg/dL) | 24.8 ± 6.8 | 26.0 ± 5.6 | 31.3 ± 5.9* | 33.8 ± 8.2 |
| Serum NEFA (mEq/L) | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1* | 1.7 ± 0.3 |
| Serum leptin (ng/mL) | 3.9 ± 2.0 | 3.5 ± 2.7 | 30.2 ± 4.4* | 31.6 ± 22.9 |
BD basal diet, HFD high-fat diet, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, TG triglyceride, NEFA nonesterified fatty acid
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM
Significant differences exist between *eNOS+/+ and BD vs. eNOS+/+ and HFD; §eNOS+/+ and HFD vs. eNOS-/- and HFD for listed parameters at the P < .05 level
Fig. 4Analysis of the mechanism associated with the pathogenesis of NAFLD. a ITT results at 12 weeks showed no significant difference in the systemic response to insulin injection between the eNOS+/+/HFD mice and the eNOS-/-/HFD mice, while it was significantly lower in the eNOS+/+/HFD mice than in the eNOS+/+/BD mice, which were regarded as the control group. b The liver SREBP-1c and PPAR-α1 mRNA expression levels were comparable between the eNOS-/-/HFD mice and the eNOS-/-/HFD mice. The liver MTP activity level was significantly lower in the eNOS-/-/HFD mice than in the eNOS+/+/HFD mice at 12 weeks. The liver SREBP-1c mRNA expression level and the liver MTP activity level were significantly higher in the eNOS+/+/HFD mice than in the eNOS+/+/BD mice, which were regarded as the control group. (Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, represents a significant difference; n.s. represents no significant difference.)
Fig. 1Analysis of liver weight, lipid deposits in the liver, and visceral fat volume. a The liver-to-spleen attenuation ratio obtained using non-contrast CT images showed that hepatic steatosis was significantly severer in the eNOS-/-/HFD mice than in the eNOS+/+/HFD mice at 12 weeks. b The visceral fat volume quantified in the CT imaging of the eNOS-/-/HFD mice was significantly lower than that of the eNOS+/+/HFD mice at 12 weeks. (Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, represents a significant difference; n.s. represents no significant difference.)
Fig. 2Analysis of liver steatosis and inflammation. a Oil-red O staining (red color) shows lipid deposits in liver samples. At 12 weeks, macrovesicular steatosis was visible in the eNOS-/-/HFD mice and microvesicular steatosis was visible in the eNOS+/+/HFD mice. Scale bar, 200 μm. b The liver TG content was significantly higher in the eNOS-/-/HFD mice than in the eNOS+/+/HFD mice. The liver TG content was significantly higher in the eNOS+/+/HFD mice than in the eNOS+/+/BD mice, which were regarded as the control group. c Liver samples stained using H&E. An evaluation of the number of inflammatory foci per field and the amount of ballooning revealed that the eNOS-/-/HFD mice exhibited severer liver inflammation than the eNOS+/+/HFD mice at 12 weeks. Scale bar, 200 μm. d and e Liver samples stained using myeloperoxidase (d) and Sirius red (e) showed no significant positive findings. (Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, represents a significant difference; n.s. represents no significant difference.)
Fig. 3Analysis of hepatic talysis of hepatic tissue blood flow. The hepatic tissue blood flow measured using a noncontact-type laser Doppler blood flow meter was significantly lower in the eNOS-/- mice than in the eNOS+/+ mice under each feeding condition (BD or HFD) in both hepatic lobes at 12 weeks. The hepatic tissue blood flow of the eNOS+/+/HFD mice was significantly lower than that of the eNOS+/+/BD mice. (Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 represents a significant difference.)