Literature DB >> 2667687

Controlled trial of heater probe treatment in bleeding peptic ulcers.

G M Fullarton1, G G Birnie, A Macdonald, W R Murray.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized controlled trial of endoscopic heater probe therapy in bleeding peptic ulcers was performed to determine whether probe therapy can reduce rebleeding rates. Of 630 patients endoscoped for suspected upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage over a 16-month period, 166 (26 per cent) were found to have a peptic ulcer. Either minor or no stigmata of recent haemorrhage were found in 115 patients at the time of endoscopy. A single peptic ulcer with either active haemorrhage or a visible vessel was found in 51 patients, 43 of whom were entered into the trial. There were eight exclusions: four were inaccessible, one was a torrential haemorrhage and three were excluded for non-technical reasons. Patients were randomized to receive either heater probe (n = 20) or sham (n = 23) therapy. In actively bleeding ulcers, immediate haemostasis was achieved following probe therapy in 14 of 18 patients (78 per cent) compared with none of 21 having sham treatment (P less than 0.002). No rebleeding occurred in the probe therapy group (n = 20) compared with rebleeding in five of 23 sham treated patients (P = 0.05). Urgent surgery for haemostasis was required in three of the five sham treated patients who rebled. It is concluded that heater probe therapy may be effective in reducing rebleeding rates in peptic ulcers accessible to the endoscope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2667687     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800760606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  19 in total

1.  Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelines.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Management of haematemesis and melaena.

Authors:  K Palmer
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Gastroenterology.

Authors:  L J O'Donnell; E M Alstead; M J Farthing
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Bleeding peptic ulcers.

Authors:  S Bown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-15

5.  Outcome of non-variceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in relation to the time of endoscopy and the experience of the endoscopist: a two-year survey.

Authors:  Fabrizio Parente; Andrea Anderloni; Stefano Bargiggia; Venerina Imbesi; Emilio Trabucchi; Cinzia Baratti; Silvano Gallus; Gabriele Bianchi Porro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Randomized sham-controlled trials in endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events.

Authors:  Allison R Schulman; Violeta Popov; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Therapeutic endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Clinical courses and predictors for rebleeding in patients with peptic ulcers and non-bleeding visible vessels: a prospective study.

Authors:  H J Lin; C L Perng; F Y Lee; C H Lee; S D Lee
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Endoscopic injection of adrenaline for severe peptic ulcer haemorrhage in high surgical risk patients.

Authors:  C Duhamel; B Parent; C Peillon; C Guédon; P Ducrotté; E Lerebours; R Colin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Current management of bleeding peptic ulcer. A review.

Authors:  M Z Panos; R P Walt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.