Literature DB >> 26676614

Efficacy of fourth-line targeted therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Bernhard Ralla1, Barbara Erber2, Irena Goranova2, Luise von der Aue2, Anne Floercken3, Stefan Hinz2, Carsten Kempkensteffen2, Ahmed Magheli2, Kurt Miller2, Jonas Busch2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evidence for sequencing targeted therapy (TT) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) beyond third line is limited. Treatment decisions for these sequence options are largely based on individual preferences and experience. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and toxicity of fourth-line TT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with fourth-line TT for mRCC after failure of previous treatment lines at a German academic high-volume center. Out of 406 patients treated in first line, 56 patients (14.8 %) were identified with more than three lines of TT. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to explore predictors of PFS and OS in uni- and multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: For the fourth-line treatment, disease control rate was 35.7 %. Median OS from beginning of first-line therapy was 47.4 months (IQR 31.0-76.5). Primary resistance at first-line TT, metastatic disease at initial diagnosis and an intermediate MSKCC score were independent predictors of shorter OS from start of first-line TT. Median OS from the time of initiation of fourth-line therapy was 10.5 months (IQR 5.6-22.6). The corresponding median PFS for fourth-line TT was 3.2 months (IQR 1.6-8.0) and was not correlated with treatment response in first-line TT. The rate of toxicity-induced treatment termination was 16.1 %. Limitations are the retrospective and unicentric design with a limited number of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients might benefit from subsequent treatment lines independently from treatment response in first line.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fourth-line; Metastasis; Renal cell carcinoma; TKI; Targeted therapy; Tyrosine kinase inhibitor; VEGF; Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26676614     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1740-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  22 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Primary anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma: clinical characteristics, risk factors, and subsequent therapy.

Authors:  D Y Heng; M J Mackenzie; U N Vaishampayan; G A Bjarnason; J J Knox; M H Tan; L Wood; Y Wang; C Kollmannsberger; S North; F Donskov; B I Rini; T K Choueiri
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Retrospective comparison of triple-sequence therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Christoph Seidel; Barbara Erber; Ahi Sema Issever; Stefan Hinz; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Ahmed Magheli; Kurt Miller; Viktor Grünwald; Steffen Weikert
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.

Authors:  Borje Ljungberg; Karim Bensalah; Steven Canfield; Saeed Dabestani; Fabian Hofmann; Milan Hora; Markus A Kuczyk; Thomas Lam; Lorenzo Marconi; Axel S Merseburger; Peter Mulders; Thomas Powles; Michael Staehler; Alessandro Volpe; Axel Bex
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Sunitinib and bevacizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness.

Authors:  J S Thompson Coon; Z Liu; M Hoyle; G Rogers; C Green; T Moxham; K Welch; K Stein
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; Bernard Escudier; Piotr Tomczak; Thomas E Hutson; M Dror Michaelson; Sylvie Negrier; Stephane Oudard; Martin E Gore; Jamal Tarazi; Subramanian Hariharan; Connie Chen; Brad Rosbrook; Sinil Kim; Brian I Rini
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniel Y C Heng; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Mark A Warren; Ali Reza Golshayan; Chakshu Sahi; Bernhard J Eigl; J Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Scott North; Peter Venner; Jennifer J Knox; Kim N Chi; Christian Kollmannsberger; David F McDermott; William K Oh; Michael B Atkins; Ronald M Bukowski; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gary Hudes; Michael Carducci; Piotr Tomczak; Janice Dutcher; Robert Figlin; Anil Kapoor; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Jeffrey Sosman; David McDermott; István Bodrogi; Zoran Kovacevic; Vladimir Lesovoy; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Olga Barbarash; Erhan Gokmen; Timothy O'Toole; Stephanie Lustgarten; Laurence Moore; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  First-, second-, third-line therapy for mRCC: benchmarks for trial design from the IMDC.

Authors:  J J Ko; T K Choueiri; B I Rini; J-L Lee; N Kroeger; S Srinivas; L C Harshman; J J Knox; G A Bjarnason; M J MacKenzie; L Wood; U N Vaishampayan; N Agarwal; S K Pal; M-H Tan; S Y Rha; T Yuasa; F Donskov; A Bamias; D Y C Heng
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of systemic therapies or best supportive care after disease progression to both nivolumab and cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The Meet-Uro 19BEYOND study.

Authors:  Giandomenico Roviello; Elisabetta Gambale; Roberta Giorgione; Daniele Santini; Marco Stellato; Giuseppe Fornarini; Sara Elena Rebuzzi; Umberto Basso; Davide Bimbatti; Laura Doni; Gabriella Nesi; Melissa Bersanelli; Sebastiano Buti; Ugo De Giorgi; Luca Galli; Andrea Sbrana; Raffaele Conca; Claudia Carella; Emanuele Naglieri; Sandro Pignata; Giuseppe Procopio; Lorenzo Antonuzzo
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 4.711

2.  Efficacy and safety of third- and fourth-line targeted therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Negishi Takahito; Nagase Kei; Iwai Hidenori; Furubayashi Nobuki; Taguchi Kenichi; Nakamura Motonobu
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.