Literature DB >> 2667638

Effect of spectacle use and accommodation on myopic progression: final results of a three-year randomised clinical trial among schoolchildren.

O Pärssinen1, E Hemminki, A Klemetti.   

Abstract

Two hundred and forty mildly myopic schoolchildren aged 9-11 years were randomly allocated to three treatment groups and the progression of myopia was followed-up for three years. The treatment groups were: (1) minus lenses with full correction for continuous use (the reference group), (2) minus lenses with full correction to be used for distant vision only, and (3) bifocal lenses with +1.75 D addition. Three-year refraction values were received from 237 children. The differences in the increases of the spherical equivalents were not statistically significant in the right eye, but in the left eye the change in the distant use group was significantly higher (-1.87 D) than in the continuous use group (-1.46 D) (p = 0.02, Student's t test). There were no differences between the groups in regard to school achievement, accidents, or satisfaction with glasses. In all three groups the more the daily close work done by the children the faster was the rate of myopic progression (right eye: r = 0.253, p = 0.0001, left eye: r = 0.267, p = 0.0001). Myopic progression did not correlate positively with accommodation, but the shorter the average reading distance of the follow-up time the faster was the myopic progression (right eye: r = 0.222, p = 0.0001, left eye: r = 0.255, p = 0.001). It seems that myopic progression is connected with much use of the eyes in reading and close work and with short reading distance but that progression cannot be reduced by diminishing accommodation with bifocals or by reading without spectacles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2667638      PMCID: PMC1041798          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.73.7.547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  13 in total

1.  Increase in axial length of the macaque monkey eye after corneal opacification.

Authors:  T N Wiesel; E Raviola
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Should the myopic child war glasses all the time?

Authors:  P W MILES
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1962-05       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Myopia--a treatable "disease"?

Authors:  M L Rubin; B Milder
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  Relation between refraction, education, occupation, and age among 26- and 46-year-old Finns.

Authors:  T O Pärssinen
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1987-02

5.  The role of accommodation in myopia.

Authors:  T Tokoro
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Suppl       Date:  1988

6.  Spectacle-use, bifocals and prevention of myopic progression. The two-years results of a randomized trial among schoolchildren.

Authors:  O Pärssinen; E Hemminki
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Suppl       Date:  1988

7.  Prevention of myopic progress by glasses. Study design and the first-year results of a randomized trial among schoolchildren.

Authors:  E Hemminki; O Pärssinen
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1987-08

8.  The relation of myopia and astigmatism in developing eyes.

Authors:  A B Fulton; R M Hansen; R A Petersen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Sex differences in refraction errors up to the age of 15.

Authors:  U Krause; K Krause; P Rantakallio
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1982-12

10.  Prevalence of myopia in the United States.

Authors:  R D Sperduto; D Seigel; J Roberts; M Rowland
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-03
View more
  26 in total

1.  Myopia. Confusing myopia with hypermetropia is dangerous.

Authors:  Martin Barnes; Tom Eke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-02

Review 2.  Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina Lindsley; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 3.  Surgical correction of nearsightedness.

Authors:  S J Bechara; K P Thompson; G O Waring
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-03

4.  The effect of two-zone concentric bifocal spectacle lenses on refractive error development and eye growth in young chicks.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Christine Wildsoet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A longitudinal study of children with a family history of strabismus: factors determining the incidence of strabismus.

Authors:  E Aurell; K Norrsell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The blindness of John Milton.

Authors:  G B Bartley
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  Heritability of myopic refractive errors in identical and fraternal twins.

Authors:  M R Angi; M Clementi; C Sardei; E Piattelli; C Bisantis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Personality, psychophysical stress and myopia progression. A prospective study on 57 university students.

Authors:  M Angi; G Rupolo; C de Bertolini; C Bisantis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. A literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; H Zhai
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 10.  Retinal-image mediated ocular growth as a mechanism for juvenile onset myopia and for emmetropization. A literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; M G Wickham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.