Literature DB >> 26676193

Evaluation of toothbrush disinfection via different methods.

Adil Basman1, Ilkay Peker2, Gulcin Akca3, Meryem Toraman Alkurt2, Cigdem Sarikir2, Irem Celik3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of using a dishwasher or different chemical agents, including 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), a mouthrinse containing essential oils and alcohol, and 50% white vinegar, for toothbrush disinfection. Sixty volunteers were divided into five experimental groups and one control group (n = 10). Participants brushed their teeth using toothbrushes with standard bristles, and they disinfected the toothbrushes according to instructed methods. Bacterial contamination of the toothbrushes was compared between the experimental groups and the control group. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Duncan's multiple range tests, with 95% confidence intervals for multiple comparisons. Bacterial contamination of toothbrushes from individuals in the experimental groups differed from those in the control group (p < 0.05). The most effective method for elimination of all tested bacterial species was 50% white vinegar, followed in order by 2% NaOCl, mouthrinse containing essential oils and alcohol, 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, dishwasher use, and tap water (control). The results of this study show that the most effective method for disinfecting toothbrushes was submersion in 50% white vinegar, which is cost-effective, easy to access, and appropriate for household use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26676193     DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of toothbrush disinfection via different methods.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Whisky, microwave or hairdryer? Exploring the most efficient way to reduce bacterial colonisation on contaminated toothbrushes.

Authors:  R Patcas; R Zbinden; M Schätzle; P R Schmidlin; M Zehnder
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Antimicrobial Efficacy of Charcoal vs. Non-charcoal Toothbrushes: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Reema Zaid AlDhawi; Najla Hamad AlNaqa; Oula Esam Tashkandi; Ahmed Tawfiq Gamal; Haifa Fahad AlShammery; Samar Mohammad Eltom
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2020-11-24

4.  The role of toothbrush in the transmission of corona- and influenza viruses - results of an in vitro study.

Authors:  Gerhard Schmalz; Laura Feindt; Franziska Tanneberger; Rainer Haak; Ahmed Abd El Wahed; Uwe Truyen; Dirk Ziebolz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.606

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.