Literature DB >> 26676191

Evaluation of the relationship between the cost and properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment.

Ana Flávia Bissoto Calvo1, Ariane Kicuti1, Tamara Kerber Tedesco1, Mariana Minatel Braga1, Daniela Prócida Raggio1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate microshear bond strength (μSBS), water sorption and solubility of glass ionomer cements (GIC) indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). Cylindrical specimens (6 x 2.4 mm) were used to test the sorption and solubility of each GIC (n = 5). The specimens were weighed before and after immersion in water and desiccation. For the μSBS test, 60 primary molars were ground to obtain flat surfaces from both enamel and dentin. The teeth were then assigned to the tested GIC (n = 10) groups, namely Fuji IX - FIX, Ketac Molar - KM and Maxxion R - MX. The exposed surfaces were pre-treated with GIC liquid. Polyethylene tubes were placed on the pre-treated surface and filled with one of the GIC. After 24 h, the specimens were submitted to the μSBS test. The failure mode was assessed using a stereomicroscope (400 x magnification). The powder to liquid ratio and cost of material were also determined (n = 3). The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. Linear regression was used to determine the relation between cost and the other variables. Overall, MX showed lower μSBS values (enamel: 3.93 ± 0.38; dentin: 5.04 ± 0.70) than FIX (enamel: 5.95 ± 0.85; dentin: 7.01 ± 1.06) and KM (enamel: 5.91 ± 0.78; dentin: 6.88 ± 1.35), as well as higher sorption and solubility. The regression analyses showed a significant and positive correlation between cost and μSBS in enamel (R2 = 0.62; p < 0.001) and dentin (R2 = 0.43; p < 0.001); and a negative correlation between cost and water sorption (R2 = 0.93; p < 0.001) and solubility (R2 = 0.79; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the materials indicated for ART exhibit distinct physical and mechanical properties; in addition, low-priced materials may interfere with GIC properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26676191     DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  4 in total

1.  Effect of a calcium chloride solution treatment on physical and mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  Dimitrios Dionysopoulos; Kosmas Tolidis; Dimitrios Tortopidis; Paris Gerasimou; Thrasyvoulos Sfeikos
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  The Effect of Incorporation of 0.5 %wt. Silica Nanoparticles on the Micro Shear Bond Strength of a Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement.

Authors:  Mohammad Bagher Rezvani; Mohammad Atai; Hamid Safar Alizade; Mahshid Mohammadi Basir; Fatemeh Koohpeima; Saba Siabani
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2019-06

3.  Energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis, fluoride release, and antimicrobial properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment.

Authors:  Sudhanshu Saxena; Sonia Tiwari
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

4.  Porosity and pore size distribution in high-viscosity and conventional glass ionomer cements: a micro-computed tomography study.

Authors:  Aline Borburema Neves; Laísa Inara Gracindo Lopes; Tamiris Gomes Bergstrom; Aline Saddock Sá da Silva; Ricardo Tadeu Lopes; Aline de Almeida Neves
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2021-10-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.