Literature DB >> 2667597

Comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of nicardipine and propranolol, alone and in combination, in mild to moderate hypertension.

D Maclean1, E T Mitchell, E M Laing, F C Macdonald, K J Gough, R J Dow, D G McDevitt.   

Abstract

1. We evaluated the relative efficacies and tolerability of various low-dose combinations of nicardipine and propranolol in patients with mild-moderate essential hypertension (DBP Phase V of greater than 90-125 mmHg; WHO Grades I and II) in order to select the best one. 2. Sixty patients completed the double-blind, balanced, randomised three-way cross-over protocol, with each phase lasting 4 weeks, and in which twice daily nicardipine 40 mg or propranolol 80 mg was compared with four twice daily combinations of nicardipine (20 or 30 mg) plus propranolol (40 or 80 mg). 3. At 'peak' effect time (i.e., 2 h post-dosing) all four treatment combinations were significantly more effective than propranolol, with effects ranging from 9-23 mmHg (systolic) and 5-15 mmHg (diastolic). Only the two 30 mg nicardipine combinations with propranolol were more effective than nicardipine monotherapy, further reducing BP by 8-13 mmHg (systolic) and 5-7 mmHg (diastolic); there were no significant differences between them. 4. 'Trough' diastolic pressures were not different between treatments and 'trough' BP control was sub-optimal on all treatments. 5. 70% of patients on nicardipine monotherapy, 33% of those on propranolol monotherapy and 30% of patients during the placebo run-in complained of symptoms. In terms of complaint rates, there was little to choose between the four combinations (27-33%). Serum potassium and creatinine levels were elevated following propranolol monotherapy by 0.19 mmol 1-1 and 6.5 mumol 1-1 respectively (P less than 0.01 for both) and following the nicardipine 30 mg/propranolol 80 mg combination. Nicardipine monotherapy elevated serum T4 levels by an average of 0.57 ng dl-1 (P less than 0.05). 6. The twice daily combination of nicardipine 30 mg plus propranolol 40 mg was therefore the optimum one in terms of its efficacy and tolerability. Further studies need to be performed to test the hypothesis that a higher dose of propranolol might ameliorate troublesome vasodilator side effects. However, none of the treatments studied was ideal for clinical use in the twice daily dosage used in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2667597      PMCID: PMC1379922          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1989.tb03419.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  22 in total

1.  The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to improve the accuracy and reduce the numbers of subjects in clinical trials of antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  J Conway; J Johnston; A Coats; V Somers; P Sleight
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 2.  The effects of antihypertensive drugs on serum lipids and lipoproteins. II. Non-diuretic drugs.

Authors:  R P Ames
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Relationship between level of blood pressure measured casually and by portable recorders and severity of complications in essential hypertension.

Authors:  M Sokolow; D Werdegar; H K Kain; A T Hinman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Anti-hypertensive dose-response effects of nicardipine in stable essential hypertension.

Authors:  S H Taylor; M A Frais; P Lee; S P Verma; N Jackson; B Silke
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Diltiazem and propranolol in mild to moderate essential hypertension as monotherapy or with hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  B Massie; E P MacCarthy; K B Ramanathan; R J Weiss; M Anderson; B A Eidelson; D G Labreche; J F Tubau; D Ulep; D Bartels
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Nitrendipine and atenolol: comparison and combination in the treatment of arterial hypertension.

Authors:  O de Divitiis; M Petitto; S Di Somma; M Galderisi; B Villari; M Santomauro; S Fazio
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1985

7.  The effect of a new calcium channel blocker nicardipine on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and the pressor response to isometric and dynamic exercise.

Authors:  R I Jones; R S Hornung; T Sonecha; E B Raftery
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Atenolol-nifedipine combinations compared to atenolol alone in hypertension: efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  D Maclean; E T Mitchell; R R Coulson; T J Fitzsimons; D G McDevitt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  What is the role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertensive patients?

Authors:  T G Pickering; G A Harshfield; R B Devereux; J H Laragh
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Amlodipine and captopril in moderate-severe essential hypertension.

Authors:  D Maclean; E T Mitchell; R G Wilcox; P Walker; H M Tyler
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.012

View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy and tolerability of fixed dose combination of metoprolol and amlodipine in Indian patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  N Srinivasa Rao; Abraham Oomman; P L Bindumathi; Vikram Sharma; Satish Rao; Latha Subramanya Moodahadu; Ashis Patnaik; B R Naveen Kumar
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2013-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.