| Literature DB >> 26675750 |
Liang Chen1, Wei Song1, David C Markel2, Tong Shi1, Otto Muzik3, Howard Matthew1, Weiping Ren4.
Abstract
Calcium polyphosphate is a biodegradable bone substitute. It remains a challenge to prepare porous calcium polyphosphate with desired gradient porous structures. In this study, a modified one-step gravity sintering method was used to prepare calcium polyphosphate scaffolds with desired-gradient-pore-size distribution. The differences of porous structure, mechanical strength, and degradation rate between gradient and homogenous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds were evaluated by micro-computed tomography, scanning electron microscopy, and mechanical testing. Preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells were seeded onto gradient and homogenous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds and cultured in a flow perfusion bioreactor. The distribution, proliferation, and differentiation of the MC3T3-E1 cells were compared to that of homogenous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds. Though no significant difference of cell proliferation was found between the gradient and the homogenous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds, a much higher cell differentiation and mineralization were observed in the gradient calcium polyphosphate scaffolds than that of the homogenous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds, as manifested by increased alkaline phosphatase activity (p < 0.05). The improved distribution and differentiation of cultured cells within gradient scaffolds were further supported by both (18)F-fluorine micro-positron emission tomography scanning and in vitro tetracycline labeling. We conclude that the calcium polyphosphate scaffold with gradient pore sizes enhances osteogenic cell differentiation as well as mineralization. The in vivo performance of gradient calcium polyphosphate scaffolds warrants further investigation in animal bone defect models.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-fluorine micro-positron emission tomography; Calcium polyphosphate; gradient scaffold; perfusion flow bioreactor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26675750 DOI: 10.1177/0885328215608335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomater Appl ISSN: 0885-3282 Impact factor: 2.646