Literature DB >> 26674746

A comparison of the relative biological effectiveness of low energy electronic brachytherapy sources in breast tissue: a Monte Carlo study.

Shane A White1, Brigitte Reniers, Evelyn E C de Jong, Thomas Rusch, Frank Verhaegen.   

Abstract

Electronic brachytherapy sources use low energy photons to treat the tumor bed during or after breast-conserving surgery. The relative biological effectiveness of two electronic brachytherapy sources was explored to determine if spectral differences due to source design influenced radiation quality and if radiation quality decreased with distance in the breast. The RBE was calculated through the number of DNA double strand breaks (RBEDSB) using the Monte Carlo damage simulator (MCDS) in combination with other Monte Carlo electron/photon spectrum calculations. 50kVp photons from the Intrabeam (Carl Zeiss Surgical) and Axxent (Xoft) through 40-mm spherical applicators were simulated to account for applicator and tissue attenuation in a variety of breast tissue compositions. 40kVp Axxent photons were also simulated. Secondary electrons (known to be responsible for most DNA damage) spectra at different distance were inputted into MCDS to calculate the RBEDSB. All RBEDSB used a cobalt-60 reference. RBEDSB data was combined with corresponding average photon spectrum energy for the Axxent and applied to model-based average photon energy distributions to produce an RBEDSB map of an accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) patient. Both Axxent and Intrabeam 50kVp spectra were shown to have a comparable RBEDSB of between 1.4 and 1.6 at all distances in spite of progressive beam hardening. The Axxent 40kVp also demonstrated a similar RBEDSB at distances. Most RBEDSB variability was dependent on the tissue type as was seen in rib (RBEDSB  ≈  1.4), gland (≈1.55), adipose (≈1.59), skin (≈1.52) and lung (≈1.50). RBEDSB variability between both sources was within 2%. A correlation was shown between RBEDSB and average photon energy and used to produce an RBEDSB map of a dose distribution in an APBI patient dataset. Radiation quality is very similar between electronic brachytherapy sources studied. No significant reductions in RBEDSB were observed with increasing distance from the source.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26674746     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/1/383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  2 in total

1.  Dosimetric evaluation of incorporating the revised V4.0 calibration protocol for breast intraoperative radiotherapy with the INTRABEAM system.

Authors:  Mubin Y Shaikh; Jay Burmeister; Robin Scott; Lalith K Kumaraswamy; Adrian Nalichowski; Michael C Joiner
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  DNA damage in lens epithelial cells exposed to occupationally-relevant X-ray doses and role in cataract formation.

Authors:  Ion Udroiu; Antonella Sgura; Agnese Chendi; Lorenzo Lasagni; Marco Bertolini; Federica Fioroni; Vando Piccagli; Antonio Moramarco; Maria Grazia Romano; Luigi Fontana; Daniela D'Alessio; Vicente Bruzzaniti; Antonella Rosi; Sveva Grande; Alessandra Palma; Claudia Giliberti; Mauro Iori; Lorenzo Piergallini; Marco Sumini; Lorenzo Isolan; Giorgio Cucchi; Gaetano Compagnone; Lidia Strigari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.