Literature DB >> 26674666

Sphincter lesions observed on ultrasound after transanal endoscopic surgery.

Laura Mora López1, Xavier Serra-Aracil1, Salvador Navarro Soto1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the morphological impact of transanal endoscopic surgery on the sphincter apparatus using the modified Starck classification.
METHODS: A prospective, observational study of 118 consecutive patients undergoing Transanal Endoscopic Operation/Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEO/TEM) from March 2013 to May 2014 was performed. All the patients underwent an endoanal ultrasound prior to surgery and one and four months postoperatively in order to measure sphincter width, identify sphincter defects and to quantify them in terms of the level, depth and size of the affected anal canal. To assess the lesions, we used the "modified" Starck classification, which incorporates the variable "sphincter fragmentation". The results were correlated with the Wexner incontinence questionnaire.
RESULTS: Of the 118 patients, twelve (sphincter lesions) were excluded. The results of the 106 patients were as follows after one month: 31 (29.2%) lesions found on ultrasound after one month, median overall Starck score of 4 (range 3-6); 10 (9.4%) defects in the internal anal sphincter (IAS) and 3 (2.8%) in the external anal sphincter (EAS); 17 patients (16%) had fragmentation of the sphincter apparatus with both sphincters affected in one case. At four months: 7 (6.6%) defects, all in the IAS, overall median Starck score of 4 (range 3-6). Mean IAS widths were 3.5 mm (SD 1.14) preoperatively, 4.38 mm (SD 2.1) one month postoperatively and 4.03 mm (SD 1.46) four months postoperatively. The only statistically significant difference in sphincter width in the IAS measurements was between preoperatively and one month postoperatively. No incontinence was reported, even in cases of ultrasound abnormalities.
CONCLUSION: TEO/TEM may produce ultrasound abnormalities but this is not accompanied by clinical changes in continence. The modified Starck classification is useful for describing and managing these disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal continence; Endoscopic ultrasound; Sphincteric lesions; Starck classification; Transanal endoscopic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26674666      PMCID: PMC4674735          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i46.13160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  19 in total

1.  Manual dilatation of the anus.

Authors:  A MacDonald; A Smith; A D McNeill; I G Finlay
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Sphincter injury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosonography.

Authors:  C T Speakman; S J Burnett; M A Kamm; C I Bartram
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Male and female sexual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  K Havenga; W E Enker; K McDermott; A M Cohen; B D Minsky; J Guillem
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald; R D Ryall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Bladder and sexual dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Nesbakken; K Nygaard; T Bull-Njaa; E Carlsen; L M Eri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  A prospective study on radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in the Netherlands.

Authors:  C P Maas; Y Moriya; W H Steup; E Klein Kranenbarg; C J van de Velde
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  Indications and results of local treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Mentges; G Buess; G Effinger; K Manncke; H D Becker
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Results of endosonographic imaging of the anal sphincter 2-7 days after primary repair of third- or fourth-degree obstetric sphincter tears.

Authors:  M Starck; M Bohe; L Valentin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Study of anorectal function after transanal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  L Mora López; X Serra Aracil; J Hermoso Bosch; P Rebasa; S Navarro Soto
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 6.071

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Complex Procedures in Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: Intraperitoneal Entry, Ultra Large Rectal Tumors, High Lesions, and Resection in the Anal Canal.

Authors:  Xavier Serra-Aracil; Victoria Lucas-Guerrero; Laura Mora-López
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 2.  Transanal Endoscopic Platforms: TAMIS versus Rigid Platforms: Pros and Cons.

Authors:  Liam A Devane; Meghan C Daly; Matthew R Albert
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

3.  Transanal endoscopic micro-surgery in elderly and very elderly patients: a safe option? Observational study with prospective data collection.

Authors:  X Serra-Aracil; S Serra-Pla; L Mora-Lopez; A Pallisera-Lloveras; M Labro-Ciurans; S Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.