Literature DB >> 26673809

ISO 12189 standard for the preclinical evaluation of posterior spinal stabilization devices--II: A parametric comparative study.

Luigi La Barbera1, Francesco Costa2, Tomaso Villa3.   

Abstract

The International Standardization Organization (ISO) 12189 standard was recently introduced to preclinically evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of posterior stabilization devices. This scenario presents some new significant steps ahead over the vertebrectomy model recommended by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) F1717 standard: the modular anterior support allows for describing a closer scenario to the effective clinical use as well as to test very flexible and dynamic posterior stabilization devices. Despite these significant advantages, ISO 12189 received little attention in the literature. Anatomical parameters depending on the spinal level were compared to the published data or original measurements on biplanar stereoradiography on 13 patients. Other mechanical variables, describing the test set-up design, were considered and all parameters were investigated using a numerical parametric finite element model. Stress values were calculated by also considering their worst-case combination. The standard set-up represents quite well the anatomy of an instrumented average thoracolumbar segment. The parametric comparative analysis demonstrates a significant (even beyond +350%) maximum increase in the stress on the device, compared to the standard currently in use. The anterior support stiffness plays the most detrimental effect (maximum stress increases up to 396%). The initial precompression step has an important role in determining the final stress values achieved at peak load (up to +76%). Moreover, when combining these two contributions, an even higher stress increase may be achieved (up to 473%). Despite the other anatomical parameters playing a secondary role, their worst-case combination demonstrates that a device could potentially undergo higher stresses than those reached according to standard suggestions (maximum increase of 22.4% at L1). Any user/designer should be aware of these effects when using ISO 12189 standard for the preclinical evaluation of posterior spinal stabilization devices. © IMechE 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASTM F1717; ISO 10243; ISO 12189; fatigue; finite element; finite element model; parametric study; pedicle screw; preclinical evaluation; spine stabilization; standard

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26673809     DOI: 10.1177/0954411915621588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of iliac screw, S2 alar-iliac screw and laterally placed triangular titanium implants for sacropelvic fixation in combination with posterior lumbar instrumentation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Scott Yerby; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can the current standards represent basic everyday life activities?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Preclinical evaluation of posterior spine stabilization devices: can we compare in vitro and in vivo loads on the instrumentation?

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The preoperative Hounsfield unit value at the position of the future screw insertion is a better predictor of screw loosening than other methods.

Authors:  Jingchi Li; Zhuang Zhang; Tianhang Xie; Zhetao Song; Yueming Song; Jiancheng Zeng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Clinically relevant finite element technique based protocol to evaluate growing rods for early onset scoliosis correction.

Authors:  Niloufar Shekouhi; David Dick; Maxwell William Baechle; Dilpreet Kaur Kaeley; Vijay K Goel; Hassan Serhan; Jeremy Rawlinson; Derek Shaw
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-08-21

6.  Stent-Screw Assisted Internal Fixation of Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Comparative Finite Element Analysis on SAIF Technique.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Alessandro Cianfoni; Andrea Ferrari; Daniela Distefano; Giuseppe Bonaldi; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-25

7.  Biomechanical Effects of Pedicle Screw Positioning on the Surgical Segment in Models After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An in-silico Study.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Chenyi Huang; Ping Cai; Zhongxin Fang; Zhangchao Wei; Fei Liu; Jingchi Li; Yang Liu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-02-02

8.  Incomplete insertion of pedicle screws in a standard construct reduces the fatigue life: A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Yo-Lun Chu; Chia-Hsien Chen; Fon-Yih Tsuang; Chang-Jung Chiang; Yueh Wu; Yi-Jie Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.