Literature DB >> 26673798

Late Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: Diagnostic Value of Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET.

Sied Kebir1, Rolf Fimmers2, Norbert Galldiks3, Niklas Schäfer4, Frederic Mack5, Christina Schaub5, Moritz Stuplich5, Michael Niessen5, Theophilos Tzaridis5, Matthias Simon6, Gabriele Stoffels7, Karl-Josef Langen8, Björn Scheffler9, Martin Glas10, Ulrich Herrlinger5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pseudoprogression (PsP) is characterized by therapy-associated but not tumor growth-associated increases of contrast-enhancing glioblastoma lesions on MRI. Although typically occurring during the first 3 months after radiochemotherapy, PsP may occur later in the course of the disease and may then be particularly difficult to distinguish from true tumor progression. We explored PET using O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET-PET) to approach the diagnostic dilemma. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Twenty-six patients with glioblastoma that presented with increasing contrast-enhancing lesions later than 3 months after completion of radiochemotherapy underwent (18)F-FET-PET. Maximum and mean tumor/brain ratios (TBRmax and TBRmean) of (18)F-FET uptake as well as time-to-peak (TTP) and patterns of the time-activity curves were determined. The final diagnosis of true progression versus late PsP was based on follow-up MRI using RANO criteria.
RESULTS: Late PsP occurred in 7 patients with a median time from radiochemotherapy completion of 24 weeks while the remaining patients showed true tumor progression. TBRmax and TBRmean were significantly higher in patients with true progression than in patients with late PsP (TBRmax 2.4 ± 0.1 vs. 1.5 ± 0.2, P = 0.003; TBRmean 2.1 ± 0.1 vs. 1.5 ± 0.2, P = 0.012) whereas TTP was significantly shorter (mean TTP 25 ± 2 vs. 40 ± 2 min, P < 0.001). ROC analysis yielded an optimal cutoff value of 1.9 for TBRmax to differentiate between true progression and late PsP (sensitivity 84%, specificity 86%, accuracy 85%, P = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET provides valuable information in assessing the elusive phenomenon of late PsP. Clin Cancer Res; 22(9); 2190-6. ©2015 AACR. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26673798     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  39 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive metabolic imaging of brain tumours in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michelle M Kim; Abhijit Parolia; Mark P Dunphy; Sriram Venneti
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Recurrent glioblastoma versus late posttreatment changes: diagnostic accuracy of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography (18F-FET PET).

Authors:  Asma Bashir; Sofie Mathilde Jacobsen; Otto Mølby Henriksen; Helle Broholm; Thomas Urup; Kirsten Grunnet; Vibeke Andrée Larsen; Søren Møller; Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen; Hans Skovgaard Poulsen; Ian Law
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  The Role of Standard and Advanced Imaging for the Management of Brain Malignancies From a Radiation Oncology Standpoint.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  "Pseudo-progression" in advanced thyroid cancer in response to kinase inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  Sina Jasim; Mark A Nathan; Keith C Bible
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Prognostic Value of O-(2-[18F]Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed WHO 2016 Grade II and III Glioma.

Authors:  Olivia Kertels; Almuth F Kessler; Milena I Mihovilovic; Antje Stolzenburg; Thomas Linsenmann; Samuel Samnick; Stephanie Brändlein; Camelia Maria Monoranu; Ralf-Ingo Ernestus; Andreas K Buck; Mario Löhr; Constantin Lapa
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET imaging for the detection of checkpoint inhibitor-related pseudoprogression in melanoma brain metastases.

Authors:  Sied Kebir; Laurèl Rauschenbach; Norbert Galldiks; Max Schlaak; Elke Hattingen; Jennifer Landsberg; Ralph A Bundschuh; Karl-Josef Langen; Björn Scheffler; Ulrich Herrlinger; Martin Glas
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  Conventional and advanced imaging throughout the cycle of care of gliomas.

Authors:  Gilles Reuter; Martin Moïse; Wolfgang Roll; Didier Martin; Arnaud Lombard; Félix Scholtes; Walter Stummer; Eric Suero Molina
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  18F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography-guided diagnosis of a malignant intramedullary spinal cord tumor.

Authors:  Sied Kebir; Okka Kimmich; Pitt Niehusmann; Florian C Gaertner; Markus Essler; Jennifer Landsberg; Thomas Klockgether; Matthias Simon; Ulrich Herrlinger; Martin Glas
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Use of FET PET in glioblastoma patients undergoing neurooncological treatment including tumour-treating fields: initial experience.

Authors:  Garry Ceccon; Lazaros Lazaridis; Gabriele Stoffels; Marion Rapp; Manuel Weber; Tobias Blau; Phillip Lohmann; Sied Kebir; Ken Herrmann; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen; Martin Glas; Norbert Galldiks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  How to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yiming Ma; Qiwei Wang; Qian Dong; Lei Zhan; Jingdong Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.