| Literature DB >> 26673393 |
Mark Lucock1, Zoë Yates2, Charlotte Martin1, Jeong-Hwa Choi1, Emma Beckett1, Lyndell Boyd1, Kathleen LeGras1, Xiaowei Ng1, Virginia Skinner3, Ron Wai3, Jeremy Kho1, Paul Roach1, Martin Veysey3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to explore whether a methylation diet influences risk for adenomatous polyps (AP) either independently, or interactively with one-carbon metabolism-dependent gene variants, and whether such a diet modifies blood homocysteine, a biochemical phenotype closely related to the phenomenon of methylation.Entities:
Keywords: Adenomatous polyp; Colorectal cancer; Diet; Folate; Homocysteine; Methionine; Vitamin B12; Vitamin B6
Year: 2015 PMID: 26673393 PMCID: PMC4661521 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbacli.2014.11.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BBA Clin ISSN: 2214-6474
Fig. 1Dietary sources of preformed methyl groups and associated metabolism, including de novo synthesis of methionine. The figure shows where nutrients interact as cofactors and the role of methyl groups in gene expression.
Descriptive statistics for nutrient intake and blood homocysteine (mean and SEM).
| Dietary methionine (g/day) | Dietary vitamin B6 (mg/day) | Dietary vitamin B12 (μg/day) | Dietary 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (μg/day) | Plasma homocysteine (μmol/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All subjects | 2.353 | 0.099 | 7.218 | 0.872 | 20.589 | 4.280 | 348.72 | 9.99 | 12.747 | 0.289 |
| AP ( | 2.454 | 0.202 | 5.435 | 0.758 | 11.748 | 2.109 | 356.12 | 16.96 | 13.170 | 0.729 |
| No AP ( | 2.322 | 0.115 | 7.749 | 1.108 | 23.228 | 5.511 | 346.48 | 11.99 | 12.687 | 0.322 |
Relationship between i) nutrient intake and adenomatous polyp occurrence and ii) nutrient intake and homocysteine. Values are corrected for age and sex and represent p, r2 and in brackets, slope. Underlined data implies statistically significant (i.e. p<0.05).
| Dietary methionine (g/day) | Dietary vitamin B6 (mg/day) | Dietary vitamin B12 (μg/day) | Dietary 5-methyltetrahydro folate (μg/day) | Plasma homocysteine (μmol/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AP | NS | – | NS | – | NS | – | NS | – | – | |
| Homocysteine | 0.113 (0.570) | NS | – | NS | – | 0.113 (− 0.007) | N/A | N/A | ||
Not included as part of the model involving nutrient intake and AP risk.
Methyl group metabolism-related genotypes that exhibit a significant association between nutrient intake (methionine, vitamin B6, vitamin B12 and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate) and adenoma risk. p has been determined using nominal logistic regression followed by an effect likelihood ratio test. Where significant, brackets show r2, slope and (in all cases), number of observations. Italics indicate values approaching significance. Results are corrected for age and sex. Where n < 20 statistics was not performed due to the inherent instability. Bold and underlined data implies statistically significant (i.e. p<0.05).
| Polymorphism | Dietary methionine | Dietary vitamin B6 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wildtype | Heterozygote | Recessive | Wildtype | Heterozygote | Recessive | |
| 1494del6-TS | NS (116) | NS (106) | NS (26) | NS (116) | NS (106) | NS (26) |
| 2R3R-TS | NS (122) | NS (54) | NS (70) | NS (122) | NS (54) | |
| C1420T-SHMT | NS (131) | NS (94) | NS (23) | NS (131) | NS (94) | NS (23) |
| C677T-MTHFR | NS (117) | NS (107) | NS (24) | NS (117) | NS (107) | NS (24) |
| A1298C-MTHFR | NS (127) | NS (102) | NS (19) | NS (127) | NS (102) | NS (19) |
| A2756G-MS | NS (170) | NS (71) | NS (7) | NS (170) | NS (71) | NS (7) |
| A66G-MSR | NS (51) | NS (115) | NS (51) | NS (115) | NS (82) | |
| 844ins68-CBS | NS (207) | NS (40) | N/A | NS (207) | NS (40) | N/A |
| C776G-TCN2 | NS (38) | NS (105) | NS (58) | NS (38) | NS (105) | NS (58) |
| Dietary vitamin B12 | Dietary 5-methyltetrahydrofolate | |||||
| Wildtype | Heterozygote | Recessive | Wildtype | Heterozygote | Recessive | |
| 1494del6-TS | NS (116) | NS (106) | NS (26) | NS (113) | NS (106) | NS (26) |
| 2R3R-TS | NS (70) | NS (122) | NS (119) | NS (54) | ||
| C1420T-SHMT | NS (131) | NS (23) | NS (130) | NS (92) | NS (23) | |
| C677T-MTHFR | NS (117) | NS (107) | NS (24) | NS (117) | NS (104) | NS (24) |
| A1298C-MTHFR | NS (127) | NS (102) | NS (19) | NS (126) | NS (100) | NS (19) |
| A2756G-MS | NS (170) | NS (7) | NS (168) | NS (70) | NS (7) | |
| A66G-MSR | NS (51) | NS (115) | NS (82) | NS (49) | NS (114) | NS (82) |
| 844ins68-CBS | NS (207 | N/A | NS (204) | NS (40) | N/A | |
| C776G-TCN2 | NS (38) | NS (105) | NS (58) | NS (37) | NS (104) | NS (58) |
Methyl group metabolism-related genotypes that exhibit a significant association between nutrient intake (methionine, vitamin B6, vitamin B12 and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate) and homocysteine. p has been determined using standard least squares regression followed by an effect likelihood ratio test. Where significant, brackets show r2, slope and (in all cases), number of observations. Italics indicate values approaching significance. Results are corrected for age and sex. Where n < 20 statistics was not performed due to the inherent instability. Bold and underlined data implies statistically significant (i.e. p<0.05).
| Polymorphism | Dietary methionine | Dietary vitamin B6 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wildtype | Heterozygote | Recessive | Wildtype | Heterozygote | Recessive | |
| 1494del6-TS | NS (116) | NS (106) | NS (25) | NS (116) | NS (106) | NS (25) |
| 2R3R-TS | NS (70) | NS (121) | NS (54) | NS (70) | NS(121) | NS (54) |
| C1420T-SHMT | NS (130) | NS (23) | NS (130) | NS (94) | NS (23) | |
| C677T-MTHFR | NS (116) | NS (107) | NS (24) | NS (116) | NS (107) | NS (24) |
| A1298C-MTHFR | NS (127) | NS (102) | NS (18) | NS (127) | NS (102) | NS (18) |
| A2756G-MS | NS (169) | NS (71) | NS (7) | NS (169) | NS (71) | NS (7) |
| A66G-MSR | NS (50) | NS (115) | NS (82) | NS (50) | NS (115) | NS (82) |
| 844ins68-CBS | NS (206) | NS (40) | N/A | NS (206) | NS (40) | N/A |
| C776G-TCN2 | NS (37) | NS (105) | NS (58) | NS (37) | NS (105) | |
| Dietary vitamin B12 | Dietary 5-methyltetrahydrofolate | |||||
| Wildtype | Heterozygote | Recessive | Wildtype | Heterozygote | Recessive | |
| 1494del6-TS | NS (116) | NS (106) | NS (25) | NS (113) | NS (106) | NS (25) |
| 2R3R-TS | NS (70) | NS (121) | NS (54) | NS (70) | NS (118) | NS (54) |
| C1420T-SHMT | NS (130) | NS (94) | NS (23) | NS (129) | NS (92) | NS (23) |
| C677T-MTHFR | NS (116) | NS (107) | NS (24) | NS (116) | NS (24) | |
| A1298C-MTHFR | NS (127) | NS (102) | NS (18) | NS (100) | NS (18) | |
| A2756G-MS | NS (169) | NS (71) | NS (7) | NS (70) | NS (7) | |
| A66G-MSR | NS (50) | NS (115) | NS (82) | NS (48) | NS (118) | |
| 844ins68-CBS | NS (206) | NS (40) | N/A | NS (203) | NS (40) | N/A |
| C776G-TCN2 | NS (37) | NS (105) | NS (58) | NS (36) | NS (104) | NS (58) |
Stepwise regression analysis of all genotypes was used to generate a model that best predicts risk for adenoma (n = 247). A2756G-MS and A66G-MSR provided significant p values (p = 0.0176 and 0.0408 respectively) with a whole model r2 of 0.0877 (results corrected for age and sex). When the model contained all genetic and dietary factors, A66G-MSR remained significant (p = 0.0259 corrected for age and sex). The table therefore provides A2756G-MS and A66G-MSR genotype and allele distribution according to adenoma phenotype.
| Polymorphism | Adenoma | Control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wildtype | Heterozygote | Recessive | Wildtype | Heterozygote | Recessive | |
| A2756G-MS | 73.7% | 19.3% | 7% | 66.7% | 31.8% | 1.5% |
| A66G-MSR | 14% | 42.1% | 43.9% | 22.4% | 47.4% | 30.2% |