BACKGROUND: The circulating tumor cell (CTC) field is rapidly advancing with the advent of continuously improving technologies for enriching these rare neoplastic cells from blood. CTC enumeration provides prognostic information, and CTC characterization has the potential to provide more useful information for the clinical decision-making process in this era of personalized medicine and targeted therapeutics. Proof-of-principle studies have shown that CTC samples can be characterized with a variety of techniques in the research laboratory environment. The goal of the current study was to validate routine cytologic techniques and immunohistochemical markers in CTC samples in a clinical cytology laboratory, using inducible phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) as a clinically important example and Ki-67 as a positive control. METHODS: Whole blood from noncancer patients was spiked with breast cancer cell lines with constitutive or inducible pSTAT3 expression and underwent CTC processing in the CellSearch system. The resulting CTC samples were subjected to various cytologic/immunocytochemical techniques and were compared with non-CTC-processed cultured cell controls. RESULTS: CTC-processed samples showed a morphology comparable to that of controls in cytospin, ThinPrep, and cell block preparations. Immunocytochemistry for Ki-67 and pSTAT3 provided biological information from CTC samples, showing uniform Ki-67 staining across all samples, pSTAT3 positivity in the constitutive and induced cells, and an absence of pSTAT3 expression in the noninduced cells, as expected. CONCLUSIONS: CTC samples can be processed in the cytology laboratory with routine methods. CTC morphologic and immunophenotypic analysis can be easily integrated into the existing clinical workflow, moving the field closer to a true peripheral blood liquid biopsy for cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: The circulating tumor cell (CTC) field is rapidly advancing with the advent of continuously improving technologies for enriching these rare neoplastic cells from blood. CTC enumeration provides prognostic information, and CTC characterization has the potential to provide more useful information for the clinical decision-making process in this era of personalized medicine and targeted therapeutics. Proof-of-principle studies have shown that CTC samples can be characterized with a variety of techniques in the research laboratory environment. The goal of the current study was to validate routine cytologic techniques and immunohistochemical markers in CTC samples in a clinical cytology laboratory, using inducible phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) as a clinically important example and Ki-67 as a positive control. METHODS: Whole blood from noncancer patients was spiked with breast cancer cell lines with constitutive or inducible pSTAT3 expression and underwent CTC processing in the CellSearch system. The resulting CTC samples were subjected to various cytologic/immunocytochemical techniques and were compared with non-CTC-processed cultured cell controls. RESULTS: CTC-processed samples showed a morphology comparable to that of controls in cytospin, ThinPrep, and cell block preparations. Immunocytochemistry for Ki-67 and pSTAT3 provided biological information from CTC samples, showing uniform Ki-67 staining across all samples, pSTAT3 positivity in the constitutive and induced cells, and an absence of pSTAT3 expression in the noninduced cells, as expected. CONCLUSIONS: CTC samples can be processed in the cytology laboratory with routine methods. CTC morphologic and immunophenotypic analysis can be easily integrated into the existing clinical workflow, moving the field closer to a true peripheral blood liquid biopsy for cancerpatients.