Literature DB >> 26671118

Comparison of different stimulation parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients.

Wei Yang1, Tao-Tao Liu1, Xiao-Bin Song2, Yan Zhang3, Zhao-Hui Li4, Zhi-Hua Cui5, Qian Hao6, Hong Lei Liu1, Chun Ling Lei1, Jun Liu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study three different stimulation parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) were tested to compare the efficacy of continuous theta burst stimulation (continuous TBS) for rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect (USN) in stroke patients.
METHODS: Carefully selected cohort of thirty-eight stroke patients were randomly assigned to three treatment groups (1 Hz group, 10 Hz group and continuous TBS group) and sham group. Intervention in patients in the treatment group consisted of rTMS, while patients in the sham group received pseudo-stimulation for two weeks. All patients were administered star cancellation and line bisection tests at 4 different time points of the study. Further, all study subjects in the three treatment groups and sham group underwent diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) at the beginning and at the end of treatment to calculate fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD).
RESULTS: Among the three stimulation parameters, star cancellation and line bisection tests revealed significant differences in outcomes at the end of treatments and one month after the end of treatments, compared to beginning of the treatments. Importantly, continuous TBS group patients displayed the best curative effect, based on behavioral scoring, at one month after end of the treatments, followed by the 1Hz group and 10 Hz group. DTI results showed a significant increase in FA and MD in superior longitudinal fasciculus, superior occipitofrontal fascicle and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus on the left side, as well as the capsula external and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus on the right side, in patients after continuous TBS. In addition, compared to the sham group, patients stimulated with continuous TBS exhibited a dramatic increase in FA in the left external capsule.
CONCLUSION: Our study presents strong evidence that rTMS significantly improves neurocognitive functions in USN, with continuous TBS showing the best curative effect. Enhanced connections in the white matter tract network related to visual attention, as assessed by DTI, might be the potential mechanism for the observed recovery in USN using continuous TBS.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous theta burst stimulation; Diffusion-tensor imaging; Fractional anisotropy; Mean diffusivity; Neural regulation; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Stroke; Unilateral spatial neglect

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26671118     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.08.1541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  21 in total

Review 1.  Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 2.  Rehabilitation and the Neural Network After Stroke.

Authors:  Norihito Shimamura; Takeshi Katagai; Kiyohide Kakuta; Naoya Matsuda; Kosuke Katayama; Nozomi Fujiwara; Yuuka Watanabe; Masato Naraoka; Hiroki Ohkuma
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 3.  Noninvasive neuromodulation for unilateral neglect after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingling Li; Hailiang Huang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.830

4.  Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) after acute stroke: A one-year longitudinal randomized trial.

Authors:  Yu-Zhou Guan; Jing Li; Xue-Wei Zhang; Shuang Wu; Hua Du; Li-Ying Cui; Wei-Hong Zhang
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 5.  Rehabilitation Treatment and Progress of Traumatic Brain Injury Dysfunction.

Authors:  Baoqi Dang; Wenli Chen; Weichun He; Gang Chen
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on depression, visual perception, and activities of daily living in stroke patients.

Authors:  Ko-Un Kim; Soo-Han Kim; Tae-Gyu An
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-06-07

7.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression after basal ganglia ischaemic stroke: protocol for a multicentre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Ying Tang; Aimin Chen; Shuzhen Zhu; Li Yang; Jiyuan Zhou; Suyue Pan; Min Shao; Lianxu Zhao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Effect of Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Depression and Cognition of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Si A Lee; Myoung-Kwon Kim
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-12-04

9.  Modifying and evaluating efficacy of interactive computerized program using motion tracking technology to improve unilateral neglect in patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Si Hyun Kang; Don-Kyu Kim; Kyung Mook Seo; Kwang Nam Choi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury.

Authors:  Verity Longley; Christine Hazelton; Calvin Heal; Alex Pollock; Kate Woodward-Nutt; Claire Mitchell; Gorana Pobric; Andy Vail; Audrey Bowen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.