Literature DB >> 26671110

Magnetic resonance imaging based morphologic evaluation of the pineal gland for suspected pineoblastoma in retinoblastoma patients and age-matched controls.

Thi Thai Hien Pham1, Eberhard Siebert2, Patrick Asbach3, Gregor Willerding4, Katharina Erb-Eigner1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphologic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of the pineal gland in retinoblastoma (Rb) patients without and with pineoblastoma in comparison to age-matched controls to improve early identification of pineoblastomas (trilateral retinoblastoma, TRb). METHODS AND MATERIALS: 80 patients with retinoblastoma and 80 age-matched controls who had undergone brain MRI were included in this retrospective institutional review board approved cohort study. Two readers analyzed the following MR characteristics of the pineal gland: signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images, enhancement pattern, delineation of the gland, presence of cystic component, size of pineal gland and size of pineal cysts, respectively. A third reader assessed all images for the presence or absence of pineoblastoma.
RESULTS: 3 patients were positive (TRb cohort) and 77 negative for pineoblastoma (non-TRb cohort). The mean maximum diameter of the pineal gland was 6.4mm in Rb patients and 6.3mm in age-matched controls. The mean volume of the pineal gland in Rb patients was 93.1mm(3) and was 87.6mm(3) in age-matched controls. Considering all available MRI scans the mean maximum diameter of the pineal gland in TRb patients was 11.2mm and the mean volume in TRb patients was 453.3mm(3). The third reader identified pineoblastomas with a sensitivity of 100% (3 of 3) and a specificity of 94% (72 of 77).
CONCLUSION: Our non-TRb patients did not show significant differences in the size of the pineal gland and pineal gland cysts compared to age-matched controls. The presented data can serve as a reference for the volume of normal pineal glands and pineal cysts in the diagnostic work-up of Rb patients with suspected pineoblastoma.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MR imaging; Pineal cyst; Pineoblastoma; Retinoblastoma; Trilateral retinoblastoma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26671110     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.10.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  5 in total

1.  Trilateral retinoblastoma: A systematic review of 211 cases.

Authors:  Ryuya Yamanaka; Azusa Hayano; Yasuo Takashima
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  A Potential Role For Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Diagnosis of Trilateral Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Sameer Farouk Sait; Sofia Haque; Sasan Karimi; Karim J Rebeiz; Jasmine H Francis; Brian P Marr; David H Abramson; Mark M Souweidane; Ira J Dunkel
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.289

3.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Pineal Gland in the Standard Space.

Authors:  Foroogh Razavi; Samira Raminfard; Hadis Kalantar Hormozi; Minoo Sisakhti; Seyed Amir Hossein Batouli
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.081

4.  MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0-5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland.

Authors:  Paolo Galluzzi; Marcus C de Jong; Selma Sirin; Philippe Maeder; Pietro Piu; Alfonso Cerase; Lucia Monti; Hervé J Brisse; Jonas A Castelijns; Pim de Graaf; Sophia L Goericke
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0-5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part II, the cystic gland.

Authors:  Selma Sirin; Marcus C de Jong; Paolo Galluzzi; Philippe Maeder; Hervé J Brisse; Jonas A Castelijns; Pim de Graaf; Sophia L Goericke
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.804

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.