Karin Nordström1, Tomas Hemmingsson2, Kerstin Ekberg3, Gun Johansson2. 1. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Occupational Medicine). karin.nordstrom@ki.se. 2. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (Institute of Environmental Medicine, Unit of Occupational Medicine). 3. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (National Centre for Work and Rehabilitation, Department of Medical and Health Sciences).
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Sickness absence in workplaces may reflect working conditions. It may also reflect a "healthy hire effect," i.e., that workplaces recruit individuals with experience of sickness absence differently. The purpose of the study was to determine if a history of sickness absence among recruits is associated with the average level of sickness absence in workplaces. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a register-based follow-up study, Swedish workplaces with at least 5 employees in 2006 were selected (approximately 127 000 workplaces with 3.9 million employees). The workplaces were categorized according to the average workplace sickness absence in 2006 and the recruits were categorized according to the individual sickness absence in 2005. The workplaces with a high average level of sickness absence were more likely than those with a low level to hire employees with high sickness absence in the year preceding employment: men - odds ratio (OR) = 7.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.6-7.8, women - OR = 7.5, 95% CI: 6.9-8.1. RESULTS: The results show that there is a greater likelihood of employing individuals with high levels of sickness absence in the workplaces with many days of the average sickness absence than in the workplaces with few days of the average sickness absence. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that sickness absence in workplaces may reflect a healthy hire effect. This work is available in Open Access model and licensed under a CC BY-NC 3.0 PL license.
OBJECTIVES: Sickness absence in workplaces may reflect working conditions. It may also reflect a "healthy hire effect," i.e., that workplaces recruit individuals with experience of sickness absence differently. The purpose of the study was to determine if a history of sickness absence among recruits is associated with the average level of sickness absence in workplaces. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a register-based follow-up study, Swedish workplaces with at least 5 employees in 2006 were selected (approximately 127 000 workplaces with 3.9 million employees). The workplaces were categorized according to the average workplace sickness absence in 2006 and the recruits were categorized according to the individual sickness absence in 2005. The workplaces with a high average level of sickness absence were more likely than those with a low level to hire employees with high sickness absence in the year preceding employment: men - odds ratio (OR) = 7.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.6-7.8, women - OR = 7.5, 95% CI: 6.9-8.1. RESULTS: The results show that there is a greater likelihood of employing individuals with high levels of sickness absence in the workplaces with many days of the average sickness absence than in the workplaces with few days of the average sickness absence. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that sickness absence in workplaces may reflect a healthy hire effect. This work is available in Open Access model and licensed under a CC BY-NC 3.0 PL license.
Authors: Minna Pihlajamäki; Heikki Arola; Heini Ahveninen; Jyrki Ollikainen; Mikko Korhonen; Tapio Nummi; Jukka Uitti; Simo Taimela Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2020-04-22
Authors: Annina Ropponen; Pontus Josefsson; Petri Böckerman; Karri Silventoinen; Jurgita Narusyte; Mo Wang; Pia Svedberg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Minna Pihlajamäki; Jukka Uitti; Heikki Arola; Mikko Korhonen; Tapio Nummi; Simo Taimela Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2019-11-30 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Minna Pihlajamäki; Jukka Uitti; Heikki Arola; Jyrki Ollikainen; Mikko Korhonen; Tapio Nummi; Simo Taimela Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 2.692