Gwenaelle Gravis1, Brice Chanez2, Lisa Derosa3, Benoit Beuselinck4, Philippe Barthelemy5, Brigitte Laguerre6, Pierre-Emmanuel Brachet7, Florence Joly7, Bernard Escudier3, David J Harrison8, Alexander Laird9, Naveen Vasudev10, Christy Ralph10, James Larkin11, Hazel Lote11, Naji Salem12, Jochen Walz13, Jeanne Thomassin14, Patrick Sfumato15, Grant D Stewart9, Jean Marie Boher15. 1. Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France. Electronic address: gravisg@ipc.unicancer.fr. 2. Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France. 3. Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France. 4. Medical Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium. 5. Medical Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. 6. Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France. 7. Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France. 8. School of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, UK. 9. Edinburgh Urological Cancer Group, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK. 10. Department of Medical Oncology, St James׳s Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK. 11. The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London, UK. 12. Radiotherapy Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. 13. Urological Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. 14. Biopathology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. 15. Department of Biostatistics, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glandular metastases (GMs) (pancreas, breast, parotid, thyroid, or contralateral adrenal) are rare in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). In a multicenter study we have assessed outcome from mccRCC with or without GMs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mccRCC and GM or non-GM (NGM) at first presentation of mccRCC, treated at 9 European centers (5 French, 3 UK, and 1 Belgian centers) between January 2004 and October 2013, were retrospectively analyzed. Association between overall survival (OS) and site of metastases was assessed using the log-rank test for univariate analysis and the chi-square test for multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: In all, 138 patients with GM mccRCC and 420 with NGM mccRCC were included; 37.2% patients with GM had Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)-favorable risk vs. 18% NGM patients; 10.7% patients with GM had MSKCC-poor risk vs. 27% NGM patients (P<0.0001). Median interval from metastases to treatment was 4.2 months (range: 0-221.3mo). Median OS was 61.5 months (51.4-81.6mo) for GM and 37.4 months (31.3-42mo) for NGM (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.3-2.2, P<0.001). In univariate OS analysis, age, delay between initial diagnosis and metastases, MSKCC, bone/lung metastases, and GM or NGM group were significant parameters (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, adjusted according to MSKCC risk group, NGM vs. GM was a strong prognostic factor (HR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.0-1.8, P=0.026); bone or liver metastases were also significant (HR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1-1.7, P<0.02; HR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.1-1.7, P<0.02, respectively). Even in patients without bone or liver metastases, GM status was significant (HR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.2-2.7, P<0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study shows that the presence of at least 1 GM site in development of mccRCC was associated with a significantly longer OS. The presence of GMs vs. NGM disease was an independent prognostic factor for survival irrespective of the presence or absence of bone or liver metastases. This finding could affect daily practice in which patients with mccRCC and GMs should receive more aggressive treatment with a potential for long-term survival. The causal mechanisms for this improved prognosis in GM mccRCC would be evaluated in translational studies.
BACKGROUND: Glandular metastases (GMs) (pancreas, breast, parotid, thyroid, or contralateral adrenal) are rare in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). In a multicenter study we have assessed outcome from mccRCC with or without GMs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mccRCC and GM or non-GM (NGM) at first presentation of mccRCC, treated at 9 European centers (5 French, 3 UK, and 1 Belgian centers) between January 2004 and October 2013, were retrospectively analyzed. Association between overall survival (OS) and site of metastases was assessed using the log-rank test for univariate analysis and the chi-square test for multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: In all, 138 patients with GM mccRCC and 420 with NGM mccRCC were included; 37.2% patients with GM had Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)-favorable risk vs. 18% NGM patients; 10.7% patients with GM had MSKCC-poor risk vs. 27% NGM patients (P<0.0001). Median interval from metastases to treatment was 4.2 months (range: 0-221.3mo). Median OS was 61.5 months (51.4-81.6mo) for GM and 37.4 months (31.3-42mo) for NGM (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.3-2.2, P<0.001). In univariate OS analysis, age, delay between initial diagnosis and metastases, MSKCC, bone/lung metastases, and GM or NGM group were significant parameters (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, adjusted according to MSKCC risk group, NGM vs. GM was a strong prognostic factor (HR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.0-1.8, P=0.026); bone or liver metastases were also significant (HR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1-1.7, P<0.02; HR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.1-1.7, P<0.02, respectively). Even in patients without bone or liver metastases, GM status was significant (HR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.2-2.7, P<0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study shows that the presence of at least 1 GM site in development of mccRCC was associated with a significantly longer OS. The presence of GMs vs. NGM disease was an independent prognostic factor for survival irrespective of the presence or absence of bone or liver metastases. This finding could affect daily practice in which patients with mccRCC and GMs should receive more aggressive treatment with a potential for long-term survival. The causal mechanisms for this improved prognosis in GM mccRCC would be evaluated in translational studies.
Authors: Jaylou M Velez Torres; Laurence M Briski; Ernesto Martinez Duarte; Peter M Sadow; Darcy A Kerr; Oleksandr N Kryvenko Journal: Int J Surg Pathol Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 1.358
Authors: Vishal Navani; Matthew Ernst; J Connor Wells; Takeshi Yuasa; Kosuke Takemura; Frede Donskov; Naveen S Basappa; Andrew Schmidt; Sumanta K Pal; Luis Meza; Lori A Wood; D Scott Ernst; Bernadett Szabados; Thomas Powles; Rana R McKay; Andrew Weickhardt; Cristina Suarez; Anil Kapoor; Jae Lyun Lee; Toni K Choueiri; Daniel Y C Heng Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01
Authors: Shaan Dudani; Guillermo de Velasco; J Connor Wells; Chun Loo Gan; Frede Donskov; Camillo Porta; Anna Fraccon; Felice Pasini; Jae Lyun Lee; Aaron Hansen; Georg A Bjarnason; Benoit Beuselinck; Sumanta K Pal; Takeshi Yuasa; Nils Kroeger; Ravindran Kanesvaran; M Neil Reaume; Christina Canil; Toni K Choueiri; Daniel Y C Heng Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-01-04