Literature DB >> 26670133

The Outcome of Primary Subglandular Breast Augmentation Using Tumescent Local Anesthesia.

Antonio Rusciani1, Giorgio Pietramaggiori, Antonietta Troccola, Stefano Santoprete, Antonio Rotondo, Giuseppe Curinga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) technique to obtain regional anesthesia and vasoconstriction of the skin and subcutaneous tissues is routinely adopted for several plastic surgery procedures. Here, we describe the use of TLA in primary subglandular breast augmentation. This series evaluates advantages and disadvantages of TLA in elective augmentation breast surgery as well as patients' response to this procedure.
METHODS: Between December 2008 and November 2011, 150 patients underwent bilateral primary subglandular breast augmentation under TLA and conscious sedation in the presence of a board-certified anesthesiologist. Midazolam 0.05 mg/kg IV and ranitidine 100 mg IV were given as premedication. Tumescent local anesthesia was composed of 25 mL of lidocaine 2%, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% NS. The solution was delivered between the pectoral fascia and the mammary gland via a spinal needle. After infiltration, 45 minutes were allowed before surgery for local anesthetic effects to take place.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 34.3 years. The average amount of tumescent solution infiltrated was 1150 mL, with a maximal dose of 17 mg/kg of lidocaine used. Operating time was 45 minutes and recovery room time averaged 125 minutes. Minor complications were found in a total of 9 (5.3%) patients, with no main surgery-related complications such as hematoma or seroma formation.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast augmentation under TLA and conscious sedation proved to be safe in the presence of a board-certified anesthesiologist and when performed with meticulous surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26670133     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Shakespearean Dilemma in Breast Augmentation: to Use Drains or not? a Systematic Review : Drains in Breast Augmentation.

Authors:  Matteo Torresetti; Yasmine Zavalloni; Benedetta Peltristo; Giovanni Di Benedetto
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Prevention of Surgical Site Infections and Biofilms: Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous Cefazolin and Metronidazole in a Tumescent Lidocaine Solution.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Klein; Loralie J Langman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-05-30

3.  Enhancement of Viable Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lipoaspirate by Buffering Tumescent with Sodium Bicarbonate.

Authors:  Ashish Francis; Wei Z Wang; Joshua J Goldman; Xin-Hua Fang; Shelley J Williams; Richard C Baynosa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-03-20

4.  Complication Differences Between the Tumescent and Non-Tumescent Dissection Techniques for Mastectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Juanying Zhu; Xinghua Qian; Jingying Feng; Fukun Sun
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Downstream Impact for Plastic Surgeons in the United States from the "No Surprises Act".

Authors:  Ross I S Zbar; Denise Zbar; John W Canady
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-03-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.