Literature DB >> 26669973

In vivo targeting of leukemia stem cells by directing parthenolide-loaded nanoparticles to the bone marrow niche.

H Zong1, S Sen1, G Zhang2, C Mu2, Z F Albayati3, D G Gorenstein4, X Liu2, M Ferrari2,5, P A Crooks3, G J Roboz1, H Shen2,6, M L Guzman1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26669973      PMCID: PMC4911325          DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


× No keyword cloud information.
Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is a deadly disease characterized by high relapse rates despite the ability of patients to initially enter complete remission[1]. While new therapeutics are urgently needed, standard chemotherapy for AML has remained largely unchanged during the last four decades and therapeutic outcomes remain dismal. Relapse in AML is thought to be driven by leukemia stem cells (LSCs), a chemoresistant subpopulation capable of initiating and reestablishing disease[2]. Studies correlating LSC proportion within individual patients to relapse-free survival have established that higher proportions of LSCs at diagnosis are associated with inferior relapse-free survival[3]. Thus, as LSCs resist standard therapy, devising new therapeutic strategies that ablate LSCs are likely to improve outcomes. We have shown previously that LSC survival is extensively dependent on constitutively active NF-κB[4]. Indeed, pre-clinical agents such as parthenolide (PTL) that potently suppress NF-κB can eliminate LSCs in vitro while preserving normal hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) function[5]. Despite its in vitro efficacy, PTL exhibits poor solubility, high reactivity with serum, and poor pharmacokinetics[6] that make it insufficiently bioavailable, limiting its in vivo use. Furthermore, LSCs preferentially reside in the bone marrow (BM) niche, a microenvironment that simultaneously supports LSC survival and provides chemoprotection[7]. To overcome this protective effect, in this study, we evaluated whether encapsulation of PTL into nanoparticles and using a BM-directed multistage vector (MSV) system (MSV-PTL) would deliver active PTL at sufficiently levels to ablate LSCs in vivo. Our previous studies have sought to optimize PTL using medicinal chemistry, producing the more bioavailable and soluble derivative dimethylaminoparthenolide (DMAPT), which required a 3x a day oral dosing in a daily schedule to be used in animals (Figure 1a, top panel)[8]. As an alternative approach to optimize PTL delivery we developed a multistage vector (MSV) system (MSV-PTL) in which PTL is first incorporated into mPEG-PLA micelles, encapsulated in a protective degradable porous silicon (pSi) particles, and coated with E-selectin thioaptamer (ESTA) to direct the particles to the BM[9] (Supplemental Figure 1a). The pSi-ESTA conjugate binds to E-selectin with nanomolar affinity (KD = 47 nM) and with minimal cross-reactivity to other selectin family members, enabling delivery of PTL to the BM[10, 11] as E-selectin is expressed on the BM endothelium[12].
Figure 1

MSV system delivers PTL to the bone marrow of primary human AML xenografts (AML-PDX)

(a) Schematic representation of the reported drug delivery for DMAPT[8], a water-soluble analog of the anti-LSC agent PTL, and for the novel multi-stage vector (MSV). (b) Percent human engraftment in established AML-PDX mice. Animals were treated with either PBS (blue), MSV-empty (red), PTL formulated in micelles (micelle-PTL; gray), or MSV-PTL (white) once every two weeks for a total period of four weeks. Each circle represents an individual mouse. Horizontal bar represents the mean. Error bars represent S.E.M. * p<0.05, **p<0.01. (c) Schematic representation of the generation of AML-PDX mice and the experimental design to evaluate nanoparticle delivery to the BM (5–10 animals per cohort) (d) Chromatograms of PTL from PTL in bone sample from MSV-PTL-treated mice at 1 h (top), untreated AML-PDX bones spiked with PTL (middle), and plasma sample from MSV-PTL-treated mice showing no PTL at 1h (bottom) n=4.

Primary AML cells were obtained with informed consent and IRB approval from Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital. Primary cryopreserved AML samples were thawed and prepared for xenotransplants as described previously[14]. NOD/SCID were then injected via the tail (5–10 animals per cohort). Treatment with MSV or MSV-PTL (one billion particles) was started five weeks after transplantation and mice were treated once every two weeks, for four weeks. The presence of human cells was evaluated by flow cytometry. For the secondary transplants, equal numbers of human cells were injected (5 animals per cohort). The percentage of human AML cells was determined by staining the cells with antibodies for PE-Cy5 rat anti-mouse CD45 (eBiosciences) and APC-H7 anti-human CD45 (BD Biosciences). For viability, Annexin V-FITC (BD Biosciences) and 7-aminoactinomycin (7-AAD; Molecular Probes-Invitrogen) were used. For intracellular assays, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and permeabilized with methanol. Analyses and graphs were performed using GraphPad Prism software to evaluate significance. The specific test utilized is indicated in the figure legends *p<0.05, **p<0.01. (Additional methods can be found in the supplementary information). To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of MSV-PTL, we established patient-derived AML xenografts (AML-PDXs). The AML-PDXs were treated with either: (i) PBS; (ii) empty-MSV; (iii) PTL-loaded micelles (micelle-PTL); and (iv) MSV-PTL. Empty-MSV and MSV-PTL particles (1 billion/mouse) were administered intravenously once every two weeks for four weeks (Figure 1a, bottom panel) for a total of two doses per animal. We found that treatment with two doses containing 50μg of PTL delivered via MSV-PTL (approximately 2.5mg/kg) resulted in a significant decrease in AML tumor burden (20% decrease AML9-PDX to 60% decrease AML4-PDX) when compared to PBS, MSV-empty, or micelle-PTL treated mice (no significant change among these groups in both AML-PDX tested) (Figure 1b). Therefore, the MSV system was highly effective for enhancing small molecule delivery. Importantly, we found that mice receiving two treatments MSV-PTL containing 50μg of PTL nanoparticles spaced two weeks apart, resulted in effective killing of leukemia cells in vivo, using approximately 40-fold lower dosage and 20-fold lower frequency that the chemical analog of PTL (DMAPT; used at minimal activity doses)[8]. We corroborated that the system can effectively deliver PTL to the mouse BM, using MSV loaded with non-specific-siRNA labeled with Alexa555. AML-PDX animals were treated with the MSV particles with one bolus dose as shown in the schema (Figure 1c). We found MSV-delivery to human cells by the detection of Ax555-positive human AML cells obtained from the mouse BM 16 h after injection with MSV-siRNA-Ax555 compared to empty particles or MSV-PTL controls (Supplemental Figure 1b). Furthermore, we observed inhibition of NF-κB and activation of γ-H2AX in the human cells obtained from the mouse BM, which are known activities of PTL (Supplemental Figure 1c)[5, 13] as soon as 16 h of treatment with MSV-PTL, further demonstrating that the MSV system delivered active PTL to the murine BM. Together, these data suggest that the MSV system can effectively release drugs to mouse BM, thus enabling an otherwise low-bioavailability drug to kill AML cells. Importantly, we evaluated the concentration of PTL in plasma and bones from the AML-PDX mice 1 h after administration of nanoparticles (Figure 1c). Strikingly, PTL was not detected in the plasma at the 1 h time point thus indicating that there was likely no degradation of the MSV-PTL nanoparticles to release PTL in plasma. PTL was only detected in bone samples (Figure 1d). The average concentration of PTL was 375.0 ± 14.7 nM (n=4). Our data demonstrate that PTL was delivered in chemically intact form to the bone tissue and not released into the plasma. Because PTL is known to be an anti-LSC agent, we evaluated the impact of the in vivo treatment on LSC function by performing secondary xenotransplants, injecting equal numbers of human AML cells from the mice treated mice (Figure 2a). Treatment with MSV-PTL resulted in a 3.7-fold and 2.2-fold reduction in secondary AML engraftment, compared to the MSV control group (p<0.05) for cells obtained from AML9-PDX and AML4-PDX, respectively (Figure 2b). The reduced level of secondary engraftment demonstrated that directed delivery of PTL to the BM using the MSV system resulted in killing of LSCs.
Figure 2

Encapsulation of PTL in BM targeting MSV impairs LSC in vivo

(a) Schematic representation of the secondary transplant experimental design (b) Percent human cells in mouse BM from secondary transplants from the indicated treatment groups. Each circle represents an individual mouse. Horizontal bar represents the mean. Error bars represent S.E.M. (c) Immunoblotting using anti-phospho p65, γH2AX and β-actin antibodies. Lysates were obtained from mice from AML-PDX9 (d) Confocal micrograph for NF-κB p65 (green) and DAPI (blue). (e–f) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for phospho-p65 (p-p65, left panel) and gamma-H2AX (γH2AX, right panel) with the indicated treatments. BM cells are from AML-PDX4. Expression of proteins was evaluated by intracellular staining and flow cytometry. Cells were gated for human cells. Each circle represents an individual mouse. Horizontal bar represents the mean. Error bars represent S.E.M. * p<0.05, **p<0.01.

To corroborate the biological activity of PTL, we next analyzed the intracellular changes characteristic of PTL that are indicative of drug target engagement. Human cells from AML-PDX mice were evaluated after the in vivo treatment regimen with MSV-PTL. Two known features that reflect the anti-leukemia activity of PTL are inhibition of NF-κB and activation of γH2AX[13]. Using immunoblots, confocal microscopy, and flow cytometry, we demonstrated that treatment with MSV-PTL indeed resulted in increased inhibition of NF-κB and elevated activation of γ-H2AX. In contrast, PBS, MSV-empty, and micelle-PTL did not demonstrate these activities (Figure 2c–f). Translation of in vitro pre-clinical findings to the clinic represents a significant obstacle in improving patient outcomes in AML where novel therapies are urgently needed. Often, a major hurdle is development chemical derivatives with useful drug-like characteristics, which can significantly delay the development of new therapeutics and clinical trials. One such example is the small molecule natural product PTL, which has established potent anti-LSC activity in AML in vitro. This study demonstrates the efficacy and utility of encapsulating unmodified pre-clinical small molecules such as PTL in a MSV system to facilitate delivery to the tumor niche. LSCs reside within and are protected by the BM niche[7]. Encapsulation of PTL into the MSV coated with ESTA resulted in rapid delivery of chemically intact PTL to the BM niche. Two doses of MSV-PTL delivered two weeks apart were capable of reducing AML burden and dramatically impairing LSC function in vivo. The poor bioavailability and pharmacokinetic profile of PTL were overcome by encapsulation in the MSV, producing in vivo efficacy against LSCs using AML-PDX mice. Indeed, PTL delivered via this system engaged cellular responses consistent with PTL activity, leading to a decrease in both AML burden and LSC function. Overall, these studies demonstrate that the use of targeted MSV nanoparticles is a novel and promising therapeutic approach in AML by facilitating anti-LSC small molecules such as PTL to the BM niche.
  14 in total

1.  E-selectin-targeted porous silicon particle for nanoparticle delivery to the bone marrow.

Authors:  Aman P Mann; Takemi Tanaka; Anoma Somasunderam; Xuewu Liu; David G Gorenstein; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  The sesquiterpene lactone parthenolide induces apoptosis of human acute myelogenous leukemia stem and progenitor cells.

Authors:  Monica L Guzman; Randall M Rossi; Lilliana Karnischky; Xiaojie Li; Derick R Peterson; Dianna S Howard; Craig T Jordan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  High stem cell frequency in acute myeloid leukemia at diagnosis predicts high minimal residual disease and poor survival.

Authors:  Anna van Rhenen; Nicole Feller; Angèle Kelder; August H Westra; Elwin Rombouts; Sonja Zweegman; Marjolein A van der Pol; Quinten Waisfisz; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Gerrit Jan Schuurhuis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Nuclear factor-kappaB is constitutively activated in primitive human acute myelogenous leukemia cells.

Authors:  M L Guzman; S J Neering; D Upchurch; B Grimes; D S Howard; D A Rizzieri; S M Luger; C T Jordan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Concise review: Leukemia stem cells in personalized medicine.

Authors:  Monica L Guzman; John N Allan
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.277

6.  Identification of thioaptamer ligand against E-selectin: potential application for inflamed vasculature targeting.

Authors:  Aman P Mann; Anoma Somasunderam; René Nieves-Alicea; Xin Li; Austin Hu; Anil K Sood; Mauro Ferrari; David G Gorenstein; Takemi Tanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu H Estey; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Alan K Burnett; Hervé Dombret; Pierre Fenaux; David Grimwade; Richard A Larson; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel A Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  An orally bioavailable parthenolide analog selectively eradicates acute myelogenous leukemia stem and progenitor cells.

Authors:  Monica L Guzman; Randall M Rossi; Sundar Neelakantan; Xiaojie Li; Cheryl A Corbett; Duane C Hassane; Michael W Becker; John M Bennett; Edmund Sullivan; Joshua L Lachowicz; Andrew Vaughan; Christopher J Sweeney; William Matthews; Martin Carroll; Jane L Liesveld; Peter A Crooks; Craig T Jordan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Constitutive expression of E-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 on endothelial cells of hematopoietic tissues.

Authors:  K M Schweitzer; A M Dräger; P van der Valk; S F Thijsen; A Zevenbergen; A P Theijsmeijer; C E van der Schoot; M M Langenhuijsen
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Phase I dose escalation trial of feverfew with standardized doses of parthenolide in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Eardie A Curry; Daryl J Murry; Christy Yoder; Karen Fife; Victoria Armstrong; Harikrishna Nakshatri; Michael O'Connell; Christopher J Sweeney
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.850

View more
  14 in total

1.  Chemotherapy Sensitizes Therapy-Resistant Cells to Mild Hyperthermia by Suppressing Heat Shock Protein 27 Expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chaofeng Mu; Xiaoyan Wu; Xinyu Zhou; Joy Wolfram; Jianliang Shen; Dechen Zhang; Junhua Mai; Xiaojun Xia; Ashley M Holder; Mauro Ferrari; Xuewu Liu; Haifa Shen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Targeted Delivery of Shear Stress-Inducible Micrornas by Nanoparticles to Prevent Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Lesions.

Authors:  Wing Tak Wong; Shuangtao Ma; Xiao Yu Tian; Andrea Banuet Gonzalez; Eno E Ebong; Haifa Shen
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016-09

Review 3.  Enhancing cancer immunotherapy through nanotechnology-mediated tumor infiltration and activation of immune cells.

Authors:  Haifa Shen; Tong Sun; Hanh H Hoang; Jana S Burchfield; Gillian F Hamilton; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 11.130

4.  Prolonged intracellular accumulation of light-inducible nanoparticles in leukemia cells allows their remote activation.

Authors:  Carlos Boto; Emanuel Quartin; Yijun Cai; Alberto Martín-Lorenzo; María Begoña García Cenador; Sandra Pinto; Rajeev Gupta; Tariq Enver; Isidro Sánchez-García; Dengli Hong; Ricardo Pires das Neves; Lino Ferreira
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Nanoparticles-Emerging Potential for Managing Leukemia and Lymphoma.

Authors:  Raquel Vinhas; Rita Mendes; Alexandra R Fernandes; Pedro V Baptista
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 6.  Development of Phosphorothioate DNA and DNA Thioaptamers.

Authors:  David E Volk; Ganesh L R Lokesh
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2017-07-13

7.  The anti-tumor growth effect of a novel agent DMAMCL in rhabdomyosarcoma in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Zhongyan Hua; Gen Ba; Simeng Zhang; Zhihui Liu; Carol J Thiele; Zhijie Li
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-03-08

Review 8.  Concise Reviews: Cancer Stem Cell Targeted Therapies: Toward Clinical Success.

Authors:  Amar Desai; Yan Yan; Stanton L Gerson
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 9.  Nanocarriers as Magic Bullets in the Treatment of Leukemia.

Authors:  Mohammad Houshmand; Francesca Garello; Paola Circosta; Rachele Stefania; Silvio Aime; Giuseppe Saglio; Claudia Giachino
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 5.076

10.  Investigating chemoresistance to improve sensitivity of childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia to parthenolide.

Authors:  Benjamin C Ede; Rafal R Asmaro; John P Moppett; Paraskevi Diamanti; Allison Blair
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.