Joost van de Ven1, Frank J H M van Deursen1, Pieter J van Runnard Heimel1, Ben Willem J Mol1,2, S Guid Oei1,3. 1. a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Máxima Medical Centre , Veldhoven , The Netherlands . 2. b The Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide , Adelaide , Australia , and. 3. c Department of Electrical Engineering , Eindhoven University of Technology , Eindhoven , The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation team training for the management of shoulder dystocia. Primary outcome measures were the number of reported cases of shoulder dystocia, as well as fetal injury that occurred from it. Secondary outcome is documentation of manoeuvres used to alleviate shoulder dystocia. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands, in a 38 month period before and after implementation of team training. RESULTS: We compared 3492 term vaginal cephalic deliveries with 3496 deliveries before and after team training. Incidence of shoulder dystocia increased from 51 to 90 cases (RR 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.5)). Fetal injury occurred in 16 and eight cases, respectively (RR 0.50 (95% CI: 0.21-1.2)). Before team training started, the all-fours manoeuvre was never used, while after team training it was used in 41 of 90 cases (45%). Proper documentation of all manoeuvres used to alleviate shoulder dystocia significantly increased after team training (RR 1.6 (95% CI: 1.05-2.5)). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation team training increased the frequency of shoulder dystocia, facilitated implementation of the all-fours technique, improved documentation of delivery notes and may have a beneficial effect on the number of children injured due to shoulder dystocia.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation team training for the management of shoulder dystocia. Primary outcome measures were the number of reported cases of shoulder dystocia, as well as fetal injury that occurred from it. Secondary outcome is documentation of manoeuvres used to alleviate shoulder dystocia. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands, in a 38 month period before and after implementation of team training. RESULTS: We compared 3492 term vaginal cephalic deliveries with 3496 deliveries before and after team training. Incidence of shoulder dystocia increased from 51 to 90 cases (RR 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.5)). Fetal injury occurred in 16 and eight cases, respectively (RR 0.50 (95% CI: 0.21-1.2)). Before team training started, the all-fours manoeuvre was never used, while after team training it was used in 41 of 90 cases (45%). Proper documentation of all manoeuvres used to alleviate shoulder dystocia significantly increased after team training (RR 1.6 (95% CI: 1.05-2.5)). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation team training increased the frequency of shoulder dystocia, facilitated implementation of the all-fours technique, improved documentation of delivery notes and may have a beneficial effect on the number of children injured due to shoulder dystocia.
Entities:
Keywords:
Healthcare team; obstetric labour complications; obstetrics; simulation
Authors: Meabh Cullinane; Stefanie A Zugna; Helen L McLachlan; Michelle S Newton; Della A Forster Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Nynke van den Broek; Charles Ameh; Barbara Madaj; Jennifer Makin; Sarah White; Karla Hemming; J Moodley; Robert Pattinson Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2019-11-10