Literature DB >> 26669773

Developing the "Control Identity" Typology to Create More Effective Testicular Health Promotional Messaging.

Michael J Rovito1, Thomas F Gordon2, Sarah B Bass3, Joseph DuCette3, Ashley M Tierney1, Nicholas Coles4.   

Abstract

Testicular self-examination (TSE) promotional interventions historically operate without a theoretical framework, which negatively influences their effectiveness. As TSE is critical to the early detection of testicular cancer, this behavior is an essential component to improving overall male well-being. To address this need, the Control Identity personality typology was developed to assist in creating more effective TSE promotional interventions. Four outcome control dispositions were defined a priori based on the dimensions of illusions of control and locus of control. An original 41-item survey, the Control Identity Assessment Scale, was used to assess perceived vulnerability, value of health promotion, and health outcome control among a convenience sample of 300 university males aged 18 to 35 years via a cross-sectional research design. Factor and cluster analyses were employed to extract salient factors in the data and to identify subgroups within the sample. A consistent five-factor structure matrix (~70% explained variance) served as the foundation from which a k-means cluster analysis was employed to classify four types of individuals. Significant differences were detected between clusters on primary variables, including behavioral intentions to conduct TSE. The Control Identity typology aims to provide the needed mechanism for health practitioners to create more effective preventive health messaging to promote TSE. Future implications on employing this typology to segment audiences in order to increase overall effectiveness are offered. Application of this typology could ultimately lead to increasing TSE knowledge retention, behavioral intentions, actual performance, and adherence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Control Identity; health behavior; men’s health; testicular cancer; testicular self-examination

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26669773      PMCID: PMC5987963          DOI: 10.1177/1557988315621143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Mens Health        ISSN: 1557-9883


  45 in total

1.  The linear interaction model of personality effects in health communication.

Authors:  Mohan Jyoti Dutta-Bergman
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2003

2.  Mass-mediated information effects on testicular self-examination among college students.

Authors:  Craig W Trumbo
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2004 May-Jun

Review 3.  Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Prestwich; Falko F Sniehotta; Craig Whittington; Stephan U Dombrowski; Lizzie Rogers; Susan Michie
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Effects of a brief theory-based intervention on the practice of testicular self-examination by high school males.

Authors:  W G Murphy; R G Brubaker
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.118

5.  The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention.

Authors:  J Brug; I Steenhuis; P van Assema; H de Vries
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 6.  Interventions Promoting Testicular Self-Examination (TSE) Performance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michael J Rovito; Chase Cavayero; James E Leone; Stephen Harlin
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2014-10-30

7.  Perceptions of testicular cancer and testicular self-examination among college men: a report on intention, vulnerability, and promotional material preferences.

Authors:  Michael J Rovito; Thomas F Gordon; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Joseph Ducette
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2011-06-09

Review 8.  Screening for testicular cancer: an evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Kenneth Lin; Ruta Sharangpani
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Randa Sifri; Terry Hyslop; Michael Rosenthal; Sally W Vernon; James Cocroft; Thomas Wolf; Jocelyn Andrel; Richard Wender
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Testicular cancer health education: an integrative review.

Authors:  J D Rosella
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.187

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.