Literature DB >> 26669557

Deeper Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Angle Improves Detection of Musical Sound Quality Deterioration Related to Bass Frequency Removal.

Alexis T Roy1, Richard T Penninger, Monica S Pearl, Waldemar Wuerfel, Patpong Jiradejvong, Courtney Carver, Andreas Buechner, Charles J Limb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays typically do not reach the most apical regions of the cochlea that intrinsically encode low frequencies. This may contribute to diminished implant-mediated musical sound quality perception. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of varying degrees of apical cochlear stimulation (measured by angular insertion depth) on musical sound quality discrimination. HYPOTHESIS: Increased apical cochlear stimulation will improve low-frequency perception and musical sound quality discrimination.
METHODS: Standard (31.5 mm, n = 17) and medium (24 mm, n = 8) array Med-EL CI users, and normal hearing (NH) listeners (n = 16) participated. Imaging confirmed angular insertion depth. Participants completed a musical discrimination task in which they listened to a real-world musical stimulus (labeled reference) and provided sound quality ratings to versions of the reference, which included a hidden reference and test stimuli with increasing amounts of low-frequency removal. Scores for each CI users were calculated on the basis of how much their ratings differed from NH listeners for each stimulus version.
RESULTS: Medium array and standard users had significantly different insertion depths (389.4 ± 64.5 and 583.9 ± 78.5 degrees, respectively; p <  .001). A significant Pearson's correlation was observed between angular insertion depth and the hidden reference scores (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: CI users with greater apical stimulation made sound quality discriminations that more closely resembled those of NH controls for stimuli that contained low frequencies (< 200 Hz of information). These findings suggest that increased apical cochlear stimulation improves musical low-frequency perception, which may provide a more satisfactory music listening experience for CI users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26669557     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  12 in total

1.  Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.

Authors:  Silke Klawitter; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today.

Authors:  Grant Rauterkus; Anne K Maxwell; Jacob B Kahane; Jennifer J Lentz; Moises A Arriaga
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 3.  Assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation: A review of current tools and their utilization.

Authors:  Tiffany P Hwa; Christopher Z Wen; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

4.  An automated A-value measurement tool for accurate cochlear duct length estimation.

Authors:  John E Iyaniwura; Mai Elfarnawany; Hanif M Ladak; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-22

Review 5.  Measuring Cochlear Duct Length - a historical analysis of methods and results.

Authors:  Robert W Koch; Hanif M Ladak; Mai Elfarnawany; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-07

6.  Effectiveness of skull X-RAY to determine cochlear implant insertion depth.

Authors:  Vinay Fernandes; Yiqiao Wang; Robert Yeung; Sean Symons; Vincent Lin
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-09-03

7.  Angular Electrode Insertion Depth and Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Floris Heutink; Simone R de Rijk; Berit M Verbist; Wendy J Huinck; Emmanuel A M Mylanus
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Vestibular Implant Imaging.

Authors:  A Hedjoudje; D P Schoo; B K Ward; J P Carey; C C Della Santina; M Pearl
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Assessment and improvement of sound quality in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Meredith T Caldwell; Nicole T Jiam; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-28

10.  Variation of the cochlear anatomy and cochlea duct length: analysis with a new tablet-based software.

Authors:  Judith E Spiro; Joachim Müller; Jennifer L Spiegel; Daniel Polterauer; John-Martin Hempel; Martin Canis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.