Literature DB >> 26669426

The Role of Anti-Drug Antibodies in the Pharmacokinetics, Disposition, Target Engagement, and Efficacy of a GITR Agonist Monoclonal Antibody in Mice.

Nicholas D Brunn1, Smita Mauze1, Danling Gu1, Derek Wiswell1, Roanna Ueda1, Douglas Hodges1, Amy M Beebe1, Shuli Zhang1, Enrique Escandón2.   

Abstract

Administration of biologics to enhance T-cell function is part of a rapidly growing field of cancer immunotherapy demonstrated by the unprecedented clinical success of several immunoregulatory receptor targeting antibodies. While these biologic agents confer significant anti-tumor activity through targeted immune response modulation, they can also elicit broad immune responses potentially including the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). DTA-1, an agonist monoclonal antibody against GITR, is a highly effective anti-tumor treatment in preclinical models. We demonstrate that repeated dosing with murinized DTA-1 (mDTA-1) generates ADAs with corresponding reductions in drug exposure and engagement of GITR on circulating CD3(+) CD4(+) T cells, due to rapid hepatic drug uptake and catabolism. Mice implanted with tumors after induction of preexisting mDTA-1 ADA show no anti-tumor efficacy when given 3 mg/kg mDTA-1, an efficacious dose in naive mice. Nonetheless, increasing mDTA-1 treatment to 30 mg/kg in ADA-positive mice restores mDTA-1 exposure and GITR engagement on circulating CD3(+) CD4(+) T cells, thereby partially restoring anti-tumor efficacy. Formation of anti-mDTA-1 antibodies and changes in drug exposure and disposition does not occur in GITR(-/-) mice, consistent with a role for GITR agonism in humoral immunity. Finally, the administration of muDX400, a murinized monoclonal antibody against the checkpoint inhibitor PD-1, dosed alone or combined with mDTA-1 did not result in reduced muDX400 exposure, nor did it change the nature of the anti-mDTA-1 response. This indicates that anti-GITR immunogenicity may not necessarily impact the pharmacology of coadministered monoclonal antibodies, supporting combination immunomodulatory strategies.
Copyright © 2016 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26669426     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.115.229864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  4 in total

Review 1.  Next generation immune-checkpoints for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Chiara Donini; Lorenzo D'Ambrosio; Giovanni Grignani; Massimo Aglietta; Dario Sangiolo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Anti-GITR Antibody Treatment Increases TCR Repertoire Diversity of Regulatory but not Effector T Cells Engaged in the Immune Response Against B16 Melanoma.

Authors:  Bozena Scirka; Edyta Szurek; Maciej Pietrzak; Grzegorz Rempala; Pawel Kisielow; Leszek Ignatowicz; Arkadiusz Miazek
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Omomyc Reveals New Mechanisms To Inhibit the MYC Oncogene.

Authors:  Mark J Demma; Claudio Mapelli; Angie Sun; Smaranda Bodea; Benjamin Ruprecht; Sarah Javaid; Derek Wiswell; Eric Muise; Shiying Chen; John Zelina; Federica Orvieto; Alessia Santoprete; Simona Altezza; Federica Tucci; Enrique Escandon; Brian Hall; Kallol Ray; Abbas Walji; Jennifer O'Neil
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Glycoform-resolved pharmacokinetic studies in a rat model employing glycoengineered variants of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  David Falck; Marco Thomann; Martin Lechmann; Carolien A M Koeleman; Sebastian Malik; Cordula Jany; Manfred Wuhrer; Dietmar Reusch
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.