Andrew Levula1, Andrew Wilson2, Michael Harré3. 1. Centre for Complex Systems Research, Faculty of Engineering and IT, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. andrew.levula@sydney.edu.au. 2. Menzies Centre for Policy, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. 3. Centre for Complex Systems Research, Faculty of Engineering and IT, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Psychosocial factors are important determinants of an individual's health. This study examines the association between health scores and social network factors on mental health across different life stages. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey for adolescents (n = 1739), adults (n = 10,309) and seniors (n = 2287). Hierarchical regression modelling was applied to examine effects within and across age groups. All the variables were derived from the self-completion questionnaire. RESULTS: The social network factors were statistically significant predictors of mental health outcomes for all three life stages. For adolescents, the three social network factors were statistically significant with social isolation having the largest impact (β = -.284, p < .001), followed by social connection (β = .084, p < .001) and social trust having a similar effect (β = .073, p < .001). For adults social isolation had the highest impact (β = -.203, p < .001), followed by social connection (β = .110, p < .001) and social trust (β = .087, p < .001).The results for seniors were social isolation (β = -.188, p < .001), social connection (β = .147, p < .001) and social trust (β = .032, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: After adding the social network factors, the models improved significantly with social isolation playing the most significant role across all life stages, whereas the other social network factors played a differentiated role depending upon the life stage. These findings have practical implications in the design of mental health interventions across different life stages.
OBJECTIVES: Psychosocial factors are important determinants of an individual's health. This study examines the association between health scores and social network factors on mental health across different life stages. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey for adolescents (n = 1739), adults (n = 10,309) and seniors (n = 2287). Hierarchical regression modelling was applied to examine effects within and across age groups. All the variables were derived from the self-completion questionnaire. RESULTS: The social network factors were statistically significant predictors of mental health outcomes for all three life stages. For adolescents, the three social network factors were statistically significant with social isolation having the largest impact (β = -.284, p < .001), followed by social connection (β = .084, p < .001) and social trust having a similar effect (β = .073, p < .001). For adults social isolation had the highest impact (β = -.203, p < .001), followed by social connection (β = .110, p < .001) and social trust (β = .087, p < .001).The results for seniors were social isolation (β = -.188, p < .001), social connection (β = .147, p < .001) and social trust (β = .032, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: After adding the social network factors, the models improved significantly with social isolation playing the most significant role across all life stages, whereas the other social network factors played a differentiated role depending upon the life stage. These findings have practical implications in the design of mental health interventions across different life stages.
Keywords:
Emotional status; Life stages; Mental health; Social isolation; Social network
Authors: George K C Wong; Belle Y L Leung; Stephanie S M So; Sandy W Lam; Wai Sang Poon Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Mary L Greaney; Deborah Riebe; Claudio R Nigg; Patricia A Burbank; Phillip G Clark Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Bernhard Scheiner; Philipp Schwabl; Sebastian Steiner; Theresa Bucsics; David Chromy; Maximilian C Aichelburg; Katharina Grabmeier-Pfistershammer; Michael Trauner; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Thomas Reiberger; Mattias Mandorfer Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Lindsay H Dewa; Emma Lawrance; Lily Roberts; Ellie Brooks-Hall; Hutan Ashrafian; Gianluca Fontana; Paul Aylin Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 5.428