| Literature DB >> 26668721 |
Diego Pizzeghello1, Stefania Cocco2, Ornella Francioso3, Erika Ferrari4, Alessandra Cardinali1, Serenella Nardi1, Alberto Agnelli5, Giuseppe Corti2.
Abstract
In alpine environments, colonies of snow vole (Chionomys nivalis Martins) cause strong pedoturbation, which may affect humification process and soil organic matter (SOM) cycling, with repercussions on the hormone-like activity of organics. We investigated the effect of snow vole pedoturbation on the chemical and spectroscopic features of soil organic fractions, and the potential hormone-like activity of humic and fulvic acids (HA, FA). The study site was located on the high-mountain environment of the Majella massif (central Italy). Pedoturbated and regular soils were morphologically described and characterized for pH and content of total organic carbon, total extractable carbon, HA, and FA. Both HA and FA were extracted and investigated using attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared (ATR/FTIR), nuclear magnetic resonance with high-resolution magic angle spinning (HRMAS-NMR), and (1)H-(13)C heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC). HA and FA were also tested for their auxin-like and gibberellin-like activities. Results provide evidences that bioturbated and regular soils contain a poorly decomposed SOM, but HA and FA with a well-defined molecular structure. The HA and FA from both bioturbated and regular soils show a hormone-like activity with a different allocation along the soil profile. In the regular soil, the highest auxin-like activity was shown by HA and FA from Oe1 horizon, while gibberellin-like activity was expressed by FA from Oe2 horizon. Burrowing activity determines a redistribution of organics throughout the profile with a relatively high auxin-like activity in the FA from straw tunnel wall (STW) and gibberellin-like activity in the HA from vole feces (VF). The relative high presence of carboxylic acids, amides, proteins, and amino acids in the FA from STW and the aromatic moieties in the HA from VF put evidences for their different behavior. The fact that snow vole activity has modified the chemical and biological properties of SOM in these soils otherwise considered governed only by low temperature has important ecological implications such as the preservation of soil fertility and vegetal biodiversity.Entities:
Keywords: ATR/FTIR; HRMAS‐NMR; Italian Long‐Term Ecological Research site; fulvic and humic acids; functional ecology; pedoturbation
Year: 2015 PMID: 26668721 PMCID: PMC4670049 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1727
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1(A) View of the Cannella Valley, Central Apennines, with the bottom valley pitted of kettle holes hosting Chionomys nivalis home ranges; inset, position of the Valley in Italy. (B) The rests of the vegetables (straw) that lined the snow season galleries, with sprouts of recently germinated seeds; seeds took advantage by the mulching effect induced by the straw pile, while sprouts took advantage by the stimulation due to hormone‐like activity of the humic substances. (C) Arrangement of the different type of superficial galleries. (D) Burrow organization with indicated the different materials sampled (for abbreviations see text).
Figure A1Scheme of the extraction and fractionation of humic and fulvic acids.
Morphological description of two representative profiles from adjacent kettle holes: “regular soil” is from an area not interested by the Chionomys nivalis home range, “bioturbated soil” is in the middle of the Chionomys nivalis home range. Cannella Valley, Majella massif, Italy
| Depth (cm) | Color | Structure | Consistence | Roots | Skeleton | Other observations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | Size | |||||||
| % | cm | |||||||
| Regular soil (Oxyaquic Haplocryoll, loamy–skeletal, mixed, frigid (Soil Survey Staff | ||||||||
| Oe1 | 21–13 | 10YR 3/2 | 3f g | m fr, w ss | 3 mi, vf, f, m | 10 | 1–15 | No effervescence |
| Oe2 | 13–0 | 7.5YR 3/2 | 3f, m, c g | m fr, w ss | 3 mi, vf, f, m | 10 | 1–15 | No effervescence |
| A | 0–50 | 7.5YR 3/1 | 3th, m pl | m fr, w ss | 2 mi, vf, f, m | 20 | 7–15 | No effervescence |
| Bioturbated soil (Oxyaquic Haplocryoll, loamy–skeletal, mixed, frigid (Soil Survey Staff | ||||||||
| Straw tunnel wall (STW) (O material) | 7–0 | 10YR 2/2 | 1 m g | – | – | 2 | 0.1–0.2 | No effervescence, very soft consistency, seedlings |
| Vole feces (VF) (O material) | 3–0 | 10R 2.5/2 | 3 m g | – | – | 0 | – | No effervescence |
| Light tunnel wall (LTW) (A material) | 8–0 | 7.5YR 2.5/3 | 2 m g | m fr, w s | 3 mi, vf, f | 3 | 0.1–0.2 | No effervescence; very soft consistency, seedlings |
| Brown tunnel wall (BTW) (A material) | 8–0 | 5YR 2.5/2 | 2 m g | m fr, w s | 3 mi, vf, f | 3 | 0.1–0.2 | No effervescence, very soft consistency, seedlings |
| A1 | 0–4 | 5YR 3/3 | 3f g | m fr, w s | 3 mi, vf, f | 5 | 0.3–0.5 | No effervescence |
| Upper–outer layer of the soil tunnel wall (UOSTW) (A2) | 4–6 | 10YR 2/2 | 3f g | m fr, w s | 3 mi, vf, f | 5 | 0.3–0.5 | No effervescence |
| Upper–inner layer of the soil tunnel wall (UISTW) (A2) | 6–8 | 5YR 2.5/1 | 3f g | m fr, w s | 3 mi, vf, f | 5 | 0.3–0.5 | No effervescence |
| Tunnel | 8–13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | Straw and seeds |
| Lower–inner layer of the soil tunnel wall (LISTW) (A2′) | 13–15 | 5YR 2.5/1 | 3f g | m fr, w s | 3 mi, vf, f | 5 | 0.3–0.5 | No effervescence |
| Lower–outer layer of the soil tunnel wall (LOSTW) (A2′) | 15–17 | 10YR 2/2 | 3f g | m fr, w s | 3 mi, vf, f | 5 | 0.3–0.5 | No effervescence |
| A3 | 17–75 | 7.5YR 2.5/1 | 3f, m g | m fr, w s–ss | 3 mi, vf, f | 5 | 0.3–0.5 | No effervescence |
Moist and crushed, according to the Munsell Soil Color Charts (1992 edition).
1 = weak, 2 = moderate, 3 = strong; f, fine; m, medium; c, coarse; th, thin; g, granular; pl, platy.
m, moist; fr, friable; w, wet; ss, slightly sticky; s, sticky.
2 = plentiful, 3 = abundant; mi, micro; vf, very fine; f, fine; m, medium.
By mass.
Contents of total organic carbon (TOC), total extractable carbon (TEC), humic acids (HA), fulvic acids (FA), and TEC/TOC and FA/TEC ratios in regular and Chionomys nivalis bioturbated soilsa. Cannella Valley, Majella massif, Italy
| Depth, cm | pH | TOC | TEC | HA | FA | TEC/TOC | FA/TEC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g C kg−1 | % | |||||||
| Regular soil | ||||||||
| Oe1 | 21–13 | 5.11d | 440.12a | 74.29a | 63.70a | 10.59b | 16.9cd | 14.3c |
| Oe2 | 13–0 | 5.23d | 280.15b | 58.52b | 49.26b | 9.26b | 20.9c | 15.8c |
| A | 0–50 | 5.78c | 77.16d | 14.55d | 12.31d | 2.24d | 18.9c | 15.4c |
| Bioturbated soil | ||||||||
| Straw tunnel wall STW) (O material) | 7–0 | 6.18bc | 294.60b | 17.06d | 10.89d | 6.17c | 5.8e | 36.2b |
| Vole feces (VF) (O material) | 3–0 | 6.35b | 376.61b | 48.49c | 21.98c | 26.51a | 12.9d | 54.7a |
| Light tunnel wall (LTW) (A material) | 8–0 | 6.84a | 64.79d | 9.43e | 3.88f | 5.55c | 14.4d | 59.4a |
| Brown tunnel wall (BTW) (A material) | 8–0 | 6.31b | 91.17c | 16.99d | 10.73d | 6.26c | 18.6c | 36.8b |
| A1 | 0–4 | 5.47 cd | 79.32d | 14.40d | nd | nd | 18.2c | nd |
| Upper–outer layer of the soil tunnel wall (UOSTW) (A2) | 4–6 | 4.87e | 24.05f | 7.24f | 3.60f | 3.64c | 30.1b | 50.3a |
| Upper–inner layer of the soil tunnel wall (UISTW) (A2) | 6–8 | 4.66f | 28.03e | 8.89e | 4.13f | 4.76c | 31.7b | 53.5a |
| Lower–inner layer of the soil tunnel wall (LISTW) (A2′) | 13–15 | 5.30d | 34.35e | 12.67d | 6.74e | 5.93c | 36.9a | 46.8a |
| Lower–outer layer of the soil tunnel wall (LOSTW) (A2′) | 15–17 | 5.19d | 31.34e | 9.76e | 4.69f | 5.07c | 31.1b | 51.9a |
| A3 | 17–75 | 5.58 cd | 29.62e | 9.89e | nd | nd | 33.4ab | nd |
nd, not determined.
In each column, mean values with different letters significantly differ for P ≤ 0.05 by Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Mean values of the three regular (not bioturbated) and three bioturbated soils.
Figure 2Attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectra of HA (upper) and FA (bottom) extracted from (a) vole feces (VF), (b) Oe2 horizon of regular soil, (c) light‐colored material of the superficial tunnel walls (LTW), (d) brown‐colored material of the superficial tunnel walls (BTW), (e) straw tunnel wall (STW), and (f) upper‐outer layer of the soil tunnel wall (UOSTW).
Figure 3Histograms of HA (upper) and FA (lower) of the ATR/FTIR peak areas processed by Gaussian curve fitting.
Figure 41H HRMAS‐NMR spectra of (1) FA from straw tunnel wall (STW), (2) HA from the Oe1 horizon of regular soil, and (3) FA from the Oe1 horizon of regular soil.
Figure 5Phase‐sensitive 1H‐13C HSQC spectra of FA from straw tunnel walls (STW) of bioturbated soil. CH/CH 3 and CH 2 cross peaks are reported in black and red color, respectively. Typical assignments are reported by square boxes: (1) aromatic systems; (2) double bonds of conjugated systems; (3) anomeric correlations of sugar‐like species; (4) sugar‐like and peptide correlations, lignin side‐chains, aromatic methoxyl groups, and α‐protons from amino acids/peptides/proteins; (5) long and branched aliphatic chains from lipids and waxes.
Coefficients of correlation and parameters of the regression curves [Y = a + b•log(X)] between concentration and root length of watercress plantlets treated with indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA) or with the humic and fulvic acids (HA, FA) extracted from the regular and bioturbated soils. Cannella Valley, Majella massif, Italy
| Treatment |
|
| df |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IAA | 0.821 | 0.941 | 235 | −1.318 | |
| Regular soil | |||||
| Oe1 | HA | 0.845 | 0.976 | 172 | −0.322 |
| FA | 0.821 | 0.953 | 156 | −0.236 | |
| Oe2 | HA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
| Bioturbated soil | |||||
| Straw tunnel wall (STW) | HA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| FA | 0.766 | 0.852 | 161 | −0.296 | |
| Vole feces (VF) | HA | 0.762 | 0.828 | 180 | −0.239 |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
| Light tunnel wall (LTW) | HA | 0.787 | 0.837 | 188 | −0.268 |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
| Brown tunnel wall (BTW) | HA | 0.801 | 0.98 | 190 | −0.149 |
| FA | 0.858 | 0.977 | 158 | −0.223 | |
| Upper‐outer layer of soil tunnel wall (UOSTW) (A2) | HA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
| Upper‐inner layer of soil tunnel wall (UISTW) (A2) | HA | 0.788 | 0.891 | 175 | −0.148 |
| FA | 0.745 | 0.827 | 167 | −0.266 | |
| Lower‐inner layer of soil tunnel wall (LISTW) (A2′) | HA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
| Lower‐outer layer of soil tunnel wall (LOSTW) (A2′) | HA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
df, degree of freedom; n.s., not significant, meaning that no significant coefficient of correlation and regression was found.
*P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P = 0.001.
Coefficients of correlation and parameters of the regression curves [Y = a + b•log(X)] between concentration and steam length of lettuce plantlets treated with gibberellic acid (GA) or with the humic and fulvic acids (HA, FA) from the regular and bioturbated soils. Cannella Valley, Majella massif, Italy
| Treatment |
|
| df |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA | 0.851 | 0.933 | 262 | 0.357 | |
| Regular soil | |||||
| Oe1 | HA | 0.877 | 0.954 | 142 | 0.099 |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
| Oe2 | HA | 0.869 | 0.919 | 156 | 0.130 |
| FA | 0.812 | 0.914 | 165 | 0.206 | |
| Bioturbated soil | |||||
| Straw tunnel wall (STW) | HA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| FA | 0.722 | 0.872 | 156 | 0.161 | |
| Vole feces (VF) | HA | 0.892 | 0.999 | 180 | 0.182 |
| FA | 0.847 | 0.989 | 190 | 0.112 | |
| Light tunnel wall (LTW) | HA | 0.752 | 0.836 | 166 | 0.192 |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
| Brown tunnel wall (BTW) | HA | 0.815 | 0.975 | 186 | 0.162 |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
| Upper‐outer layer of soil tunnel wall (UOSTW) (A2) | HA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| FA | 0.855 | 0.949 | 186 | 0.154 | |
| Upper‐inner layer of soil tunnel wall (UISTW) (A2) | HA | 0.867 | 0.976 | 192 | 0.093 |
| FA | 0.815 | 0.936 | 158 | 0.146 | |
| Lower‐inner layer of soil tunnel wall (LISTW) (A2′) | HA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
| Lower‐outer layer of soil tunnel wall (LOSTW) (A2′) | HA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | |
| FA | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | ||
df, degree of freedom; n.s., not significant, meaning that no significant coefficient of correlation and regression were found.
*P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P = 0.001.