Literature DB >> 26668093

[Please do Something - no Matter what! A Nationwide Online Survey of Mental Health Service Users About the Use of Alternatives to Coercive Measures].

Kolja Heumann1, Thomas Bock1, Tania M Lincoln2.   

Abstract

Aim In recent years the legal basis in Germany for the use of coercive measures in psychiatry has changed. Now, coercive measures are permitted only as last resort after milder measures failed. However, there is no regulation of the type or amount of milder measures. In this study, we investigated which and how many milder measures were experienced by service users before coercion was used and which measures they value as potentially helpful to avoid it. Methods A sample of 83 service users was recruited. In an online survey the experience with 21 milder measures and their evaluation as helpful were assessed by self-report. Results On average, participants reported 5.4 experienced milder measures. The most frequent reason provided for why measures failed were structural factors, followed by staff behavior, and reasons caused by the participants themselves. The only milder measure rated by less than 50 % as potentially helpful in avoiding coercive measures was being persuaded to take medication.Conclusion Although many milder measures are perceived as potentially helpful, only few seem to be made use of in routine clinical practice. In order to prevent coercion staff members should apply a wider range of milder measures. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26668093     DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-109033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Prax        ISSN: 0303-4259


  1 in total

Review 1.  [Coercive interventions: historical summary and review of subjective experience].

Authors:  Monika Edlinger; Tobias Bader; Alex Hofer
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr       Date:  2018-09-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.