Literature DB >> 26667798

Harmonization in laboratory medicine: Requests, samples, measurements and reports.

Mario Plebani1.   

Abstract

In laboratory medicine, the terms "standardization" and "harmonization" are frequently used interchangeably as the final goal is the same: the equivalence of measurement results among different routine measurement procedures over time and space according to defined analytical and clinical quality specifications. However, the terms define two distinct, albeit closely linked, concepts based on traceability principles. The word "standardization" is used when results for a measurement are equivalent and traceable to the International System of Units (SI) through a high-order primary reference material and/or a reference measurement procedure (RMP). "Harmonization" is generally used when results are equivalent, but neither a high-order primary reference material nor a reference measurement procedure is available. Harmonization is a fundamental aspect of quality in laboratory medicine as its ultimate goal is to improve patient outcomes through the provision of accurate and actionable laboratory information. Patients, clinicians and other healthcare professionals assume that clinical laboratory tests performed by different laboratories at different times on the same sample and specimen can be compared, and that results can be reliably and consistently interpreted. Unfortunately, this is not necessarily the case, because many laboratory test results are still highly variable and poorly standardized and harmonized. Although the initial focus was mainly on harmonizing and standardizing analytical processes and methods, the scope of harmonization now also includes all other aspects of the total testing process (TTP), such as terminology and units, report formats, reference intervals and decision limits as well as tests and test profiles, requests and criteria for interpretation. Several projects and initiatives aiming to improve standardization and harmonization in the testing process are now underway. Laboratory professionals should therefore step up their efforts to provide interchangeable and comparable laboratory information in order to ultimately assure better diagnosis and treatment in patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Harmonization; global picture; patient safety; post-analytical phase; pre-analytical phase; quality; standardization; total testing process

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26667798     DOI: 10.3109/10408363.2015.1116851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci        ISSN: 1040-8363            Impact factor:   6.250


  6 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in the Standardization of Autoantibody Testing: a Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Renato Tozzoli; Danilo Villalta; Nicola Bizzaro
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 2.  Consolidation of Clinical Microbiology Laboratories and Introduction of Transformative Technologies.

Authors:  Zisis Kozlakidis; Alex van Belkum; Olivier Vandenberg; Géraldine Durand; Marie Hallin; Andreas Diefenbach; Vanya Gant; Patrick Murray
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Quality Assurance in Clinical Chemistry: A Touch of Statistics and A Lot of Common Sense.

Authors:  Elvar Theodorsson
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The concurrence of the current postanalytical phase management with the national recommendations: a survey of the Working Group for Postanalytics of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

Authors:  Anja Jokic; Vladimira Rimac; Jelena Vlasic Tanaskovic; Sonja Podolar; Lorena Honovic; Jasna Lenicek Krleza
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

5.  Variation in Laboratory Reports: Causes other than Laboratory Error.

Authors:  Santosh Pradhan; Keyoor Gautam; Vivek Pant
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 0.556

6.  Interpretative comments - need for harmonization? Results of the Croatian survey by the Working Group for Post-analytics.

Authors:  Vladimira Rimac; Sonja Podolar; Anja Jokic; Jelena Vlasic Tanaskovic; Lorena Honovic; Jasna Lenicek Krleza
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.