| Literature DB >> 26667589 |
Sunny A Abbah1,2,3, Luis M Delgado1,2,3, Ayesha Azeem1,2,3, Kieran Fuller1,2,3, Naledi Shologu1,2,3, Michael Keeney4, Manus J Biggs2,3, Abhay Pandit2,3, Dimitrios I Zeugolis1,2,3.
Abstract
Cells within a tissue are able to perceive, interpret and respond to the biophysical, biomechanical, and biochemical properties of the 3D extracellular matrix environment in which they reside. Such stimuli regulate cell adhesion, metabolic state, proliferation, migration, fate and lineage commitment, and ultimately, tissue morphogenesis and function. Current scaffold fabrication strategies in musculoskeletal tissue engineering seek to mimic the sophistication and comprehensiveness of nature to develop hierarchically assembled 3D implantable devices of different geometric dimensions (nano- to macrometric scales) that will offer control over cellular functions and ultimately achieve functional regeneration. Herein, advances and shortfalls of bottom-up (self-assembly, freeze-drying, rapid prototype, electrospinning) and top-down (imprinting) scaffold fabrication approaches, specific to musculoskeletal tissue engineering, are discussed and critically assessed.Keywords: additive manufacturing; electrospinning; freeze‐drying; imprinting; scaffold fabrication technologies; self‐assembly; tissue engineering
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26667589 DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201500004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Healthc Mater ISSN: 2192-2640 Impact factor: 9.933