Literature DB >> 26666956

Philippine protected areas are not meeting the biodiversity coverage and management effectiveness requirements of Aichi Target 11.

Neil Aldrin D Mallari1, Nigel J Collar2,3, Philip J K McGowan4, Stuart J Marsden5.   

Abstract

Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity urges, inter alia, that nations protect at least 17 % of their land, and that protection is effective and targets areas of importance for biodiversity. Five years before reporting on Aichi targets is due, we assessed the Philippines' current protected area system for biodiversity coverage, appropriateness of management regimes and capacity to deliver protection. Although protected estate already covers 11 % of the Philippines' land area, 64 % of its key biodiversity areas (KBAs) remain unprotected. Few protected areas have appropriate management and governance infrastructures, funding streams, management plans and capacity, and a serious mismatch exists between protected area land zonation regimes and conservation needs of key species. For the Philippines to meet the biodiversity coverage and management effectiveness elements of Aichi Target 11, protected area and KBA boundaries should be aligned, management systems reformed to pursue biodiversity-led targets and effective management capacity created.

Keywords:  Birds; CBD; Key biodiversity areas; Management plans; Philippines

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26666956      PMCID: PMC4815757          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0740-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  11 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity.

Authors:  Ana S L Rodrigues; Sandy J Andelman; Mohamed I Bakarr; Luigi Boitani; Thomas M Brooks; Richard M Cowling; Lincoln D C Fishpool; Gustavo A B Da Fonseca; Kevin J Gaston; Michael Hoffmann; Janice S Long; Pablo A Marquet; John D Pilgrim; Robert L Pressey; Jan Schipper; Wes Sechrest; Simon N Stuart; Les G Underhill; Robert W Waller; Matthew E J Watts; Xie Yan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness.

Authors:  Fiona Leverington; Katia Lemos Costa; Helena Pavese; Allan Lisle; Marc Hockings
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes.

Authors:  Richard A Fuller; Eve McDonald-Madden; Kerrie A Wilson; Josie Carwardine; Hedley S Grantham; James E M Watson; Carissa J Klein; David C Green; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation.

Authors:  Ana S L Rodrigues; John D Pilgrim; John F Lamoreux; Michael Hoffmann; Thomas M Brooks
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Biodiversity conservation in local planning.

Authors:  James R Miller; Martha Groom; George R Hess; Toddi Steelman; David L Stokes; Jan Thompson; Troy Bowman; Laura Fricke; Brandon King; Ryan Marquardt
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  Protected areas in South Asia have not prevented habitat loss: a study using historical models of land-use change.

Authors:  Natalie E Clark; Elizabeth H Boakes; Philip J K McGowan; Georgina M Mace; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets.

Authors:  Stuart H M Butchart; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Mike I Evans; Suhel Quader; Salvatore Aricò; Julius Arinaitwe; Mark Balman; Leon A Bennun; Bastian Bertzky; Charles Besançon; Timothy M Boucher; Thomas M Brooks; Ian J Burfield; Neil D Burgess; Simba Chan; Rob P Clay; Mike J Crosby; Nicholas C Davidson; Naamal De Silva; Christian Devenish; Guy C L Dutson; David F Día Z Fernández; Lincoln D C Fishpool; Claire Fitzgerald; Matt Foster; Melanie F Heath; Marc Hockings; Michael Hoffmann; David Knox; Frank W Larsen; John F Lamoreux; Colby Loucks; Ian May; James Millett; Dominic Molloy; Paul Morling; Mike Parr; Taylor H Ricketts; Nathalie Seddon; Benjamin Skolnik; Simon N Stuart; Amy Upgren; Stephen Woodley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Global protected area impacts.

Authors:  Lucas N Joppa; Alexander Pfaff
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  High and far: biases in the location of protected areas.

Authors:  Lucas N Joppa; Alexander Pfaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.