| Literature DB >> 26666911 |
Xueqin Zhao1, Yunxin Zhong2, Ting Ye3, Dajing Wang3, Bingwei Mao4.
Abstract
The mechanical properties of cells are considered promising biomarkers for the early diagnosis of cancer. Recently, atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based nanoindentation technology has been utilized for the examination of cell cortex mechanics in order to distinguish malignant cells from normal cells. However, few attempts to evaluate the biomechanical properties of cells have focused on the quantification of the non-homogeneous longitudinal elasticity of cellular structures. In the present study, we applied a variation of the method of Carl and Schillers to investigate the differences between longitudinal elasticity of human cervical squamous carcinoma cells (CaSki) and normal cervical epithelial cells (CRL2614) using AFM. The results reveal a three-layer heterogeneous structure in the probing volume of both cell types studied. CaSki cells exhibited a lower whole-cell stiffness and a softer nuclei zone compared to the normal counterpart cells. Moreover, a better differentiated cytoskeleton was found in the inner cytoplasm/nuclei zone of the normal CRL2614 cells, whereas a deeper cytoskeletal distribution was observed in the probing volume of the cancerous counterparts. The sensitive cortical panel of CaSki cells, with a modulus of 0.35~0.47 kPa, was located at 237~225 nm; in normal cells, the elasticity was 1.20~1.32 kPa at 113~128 nm. The present improved method may be validated using the conventional Hertz-Sneddon method, which is widely reported in the literature. In conclusion, our results enable the quantification of the heterogeneous longitudinal elasticity of cancer cells, in particular the correlation with the corresponding depth. Preliminary results indicate that our method may potentially be applied to improve the detection of cancerous cells and provide insights into the pathophysiology of the disease.Entities:
Keywords: Atomic force microscopy; Cell mechanics; Cervical cancer; Longitudinal elasticity; Nanoindentation
Year: 2015 PMID: 26666911 PMCID: PMC4678138 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-015-1174-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1Schematic of the AFM elasticity measurements. a Illustration of cell elasticity measurements using AFM. b The optical image from the top-view camera integrated with the AFM system used. Inset: an illustration of the force spectroscopy mode; a grid has been set over the cell nucleus (CaSki cells, deflection image). c Force at the power 1/2 versus deformation relationship of a cell. Such representation (Eq. 1) of the data reveals three linear regimes (E1, E2, and E3) of the curve (red lines correspond to the fits; black circles represent the experimental data). The inset shows the force–deformation curve of the same indentation data. d Young’s modulus is determined by subtraction of curves recorded on hard (Si sheet) and soft surfaces (CaSki and CRL2614 cells)
Fig. 2Distribution of Young’s moduli at shallow indentations (<200 nm) for a human cervical cancer cells (CaSki) and b normal cervical epithelial cells (CRL2614). Histogram bin width of 250 Pa. Gaussian fitting was performed for peak elasticity (solid line)
Fig. 3Histograms showing Gaussian fittings of Young’s moduli and corresponding depth for cells studied. a, c Young’s moduli and b, d corresponding depth, a, c for human cervical cancer cells (CaSki) and b, d for normal cervical epithelial cells (CRL2614). The outlined data refers to the most probable values. Histogram bin widths of 500 Pa and 50 nm, respectively
The effects of normal cervical cells CRL2614 and cancer cells CaSki on cell elasticity and depth distribution
| Elasticity | Depth | Density | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Ae% |
| Mean | SD | Ad% |
|
| D% | |
| CaSki | 0.41 | 0.065 | 15.54 | 1.59 | 231.19 | 6.11 | 32.28 | 1.76 | 0.48 | 14.24 |
| 1.83 | 0.08 | 47.4 | 0 | 485.39 | 17.53 | 22.98 | 0 | 2.06 | 61.13 | |
| 3.86 | 0.28 | 37.05 | 1.31 | 949.26 | 47.72 | 44.74 | 1.41 | 0.83 | 24.63 | |
| CRL2614 | 1.26 | 0.062 | 57.22 | 1.5 | 116.95 | 6.5 | 12.68 | 1.86 | 04.51 | 79.26 |
| 2.49 | 0.091 | 24.9 | 0 | 394.38 | 11.36 | 28.73 | 0 | 0.87 | 15.29 | |
| 3.98 | 0.09 | 17.88 | 2.05 | 713.92 | 85.1 | 58.59 | 0.71 | 0.31 | 5.45 | |
Rows of data came from Gaussian distribution done
Fig. 4Comparison of elasticity (a) and corresponding depth (b) of cancer cells and normal cells. Single plot represents shallow indentation, and line indicates deep indentation. Each data point on the graph refers to the most probable values obtained by Gaussian fitting of the corresponding histogram