Literature DB >> 26666898

Magnetic vestibular stimulation modulates default mode network fluctuations.

Rainer Boegle1, Thomas Stephan2, Matthias Ertl3, Stefan Glasauer4, Marianne Dieterich5.   

Abstract

Strong magnetic fields (>1 Tesla) can cause dizziness and it was recently shown that healthy subjects (resting in total darkness) developed a persistent nystagmus even when remaining completely motionless within a MR tomograph. Consequently, it was speculated that this magnetic vestibular stimulation (MVS) might influence fMRI results, as nystagmus is indicative of an imbalance in the vestibular system, potentially influencing other systems via multisensory vestibular interactions. The objective of our study was to investigate whether MVS does indeed modulate BOLD signal fluctuations. We recorded eye movements, as well as, resting-state fMRI of 30 volunteers in darkness at 1.5 T and 3.0 T to answer the question whether MVS modulated parts of the default mode resting-state network (DMN) in accordance with the Lorentz-force model for MVS, while distinguishing this from the known signal increase due to field strength related imaging effects. Our results showed that modulation of the default mode network occurred mainly in areas associated with vestibular and ocular motor function, and was in accordance with the Lorentz-force model, i.e., double than the expected signal scaling due to field strength alone. We discuss the implications of our findings for the interpretation of studies using resting-state fMRI, especially those concerning vestibular research. We conclude that MVS needs to be considered in vestibular research to avoid biased results, but it might also offer the possibility of manipulating network dynamics and may thus help in studying the brain as a dynamical system.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic vestibular stimulation; Resting-state fMRI; Resting-state networks; Vestibular imbalance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26666898     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  6 in total

1.  Magnetic vestibular stimulation influences resting-state fluctuations and induces visual-vestibular biases.

Authors:  Rainer Boegle; M Ertl; T Stephan; M Dieterich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Multiple Time Courses of Vestibular Set-Point Adaptation Revealed by Sustained Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Labyrinth.

Authors:  Prem Jareonsettasin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Michael C Schubert; David S Zee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation (MVS) As a Technique for Understanding the Normal and Diseased Labyrinth.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Jorge Otero-Millan; Prem Jareonsettasin; Michael C Schubert; Dale C Roberts; David S Zee
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Modulatory effects of magnetic vestibular stimulation on resting-state networks can be explained by subject-specific orientation of inner-ear anatomy in the MR static magnetic field.

Authors:  R Boegle; V Kirsch; J Gerb; M Dieterich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Direct comparison of activation maps during galvanic vestibular stimulation: A hybrid H2[15 O] PET-BOLD MRI activation study.

Authors:  Sandra Becker-Bense; Frode Willoch; Thomas Stephan; Matthias Brendel; Igor Yakushev; Maximilian Habs; Sibylle Ziegler; Michael Herz; Markus Schwaiger; Marianne Dieterich; Peter Bartenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Positron emission tomography visualized stimulation of the vestibular organ is localized in Heschl's gyrus.

Authors:  Louise Devantier; Allan K Hansen; Jens-Jacob Mølby-Henriksen; Christian B Christensen; Michael Pedersen; Kim V Hansen; Måns Magnusson; Therese Ovesen; Per Borghammer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 5.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.