Literature DB >> 26666390

Effect of Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Topography of Monolithic Zirconia.

C L Goo, Auj Yap, Kbc Tan, A S Fawzy.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of different chairside polishing systems on the surface roughness and topography of monolithic zirconia. Thirty-five monolithic zirconia specimens (Lava PLUS, 3M ESPE) were fabricated and divided into five groups of seven and polished with the following: Group 1 (WZ)-Dura white stone followed by Shofu zirconia polishing kit; Group 2 (SZ)-Shofu zirconia polishing kit; Group 3 (CE)-Ceramiste porcelain polishers; Group 4 (CM)-Ceramaster porcelain polishers; and Group 5 (KZ)-Komet ZR zirconia polishers. All specimens were ground with a fine-grit diamond bur prior to polishing procedures to simulate clinical finishing. Baseline and post-polishing profilometric readings were recorded and delta Ra values (difference in mean surface roughness before and after polishing) were computed and analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Scheffe post hoc test (p<0.05). Representative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the ground but unpolished and polished specimens were acquired. Delta Ra values ranged from 0.146 for CE to 0.400 for KZ. Delta Ra values for KZ, WZ, and SZ were significantly greater than for CE. Significant differences in delta Ra values were also observed between KZ and CM. The SEM images obtained were consistent with the profilometric findings. Diamond-impregnated polishing systems were more effective than silica carbide-impregnated ones in reducing the surface roughness of ground monolithic zirconia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26666390     DOI: 10.2341/15-064-L

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  7 in total

1.  Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and low temperature degradation on the surface topography, phase transformation and flexural strength of ultra-translucent ZrO2 ceramic.

Authors:  Taciana Emília Leite Vila-Nova; Isabelle Helena Gurgel de Carvalho; Dayanne Monielle Duarte Moura; André Ulisses Dantas Batista; Yu Zhang; Carlos Alberto Paskocimas; Marco Antonio Bottino; Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E Souza
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Effects of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Crystal Structure of Zirconia.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Xiaohua Zeng
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 1.781

3.  Effects of different surface finishing protocols for zirconia on surface roughness and bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Du-Hyeong Lee; Hang-Nga Mai; Phyu Pwint Thant; Su-Hyung Hong; Jaewon Kim; Seung-Mi Jeong; Keun-Woo Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Quantitative analysis on the wear of monolithic zirconia crowns on antagonist teeth.

Authors:  Zhenyu Tang; Xinyi Zhao; Hui Wang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  Wear Behavior of Different Generations of Zirconia: Present Literature.

Authors:  Kuljirarnat Jitwirachot; Pimduen Rungsiyakull; Julie A Holloway; Wissanee Jia-Mahasap
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-03-07

6.  An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems.

Authors:  Sneha Harishchandra Gaonkar; Meena Ajay Aras; Vidya Chitre
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-04-07

7.  A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia.

Authors:  Mohit Kheur; Tabrez Lakha; Saleha Shaikh; Supriya Kheur; Batul Qamri; Lee Wan Zhen; Nadin Al-Haj Husain; Mutlu Özcan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.