| Literature DB >> 26666331 |
Zikulah Namukwaya1, Linda Barlow-Mosha2, Peter Mudiope3, Adeodata Kekitiinwa4,5, Joyce Namale Matovu6, Ezra Musingye7, Jane Ntongo Ssebaggala8, Teopista Nakyanzi9, Jubilee John Abwooli10, Dorothy Mirembe11, Juliane Etima12, Edward Bitarakwate13, Mary Glenn Fowler14, Philippa Martha Musoke15,16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Effective Prevention of Mother to child Transmission of HIV (PMTCT) relies heavily on follow-up of HIV-infected women and infants from antenatal, through postnatal, to the end of the breastfeeding period. In Uganda, postnatal (PNC) follow-up remains below 50 % creating a missed opportunity for linkage to comprehensive HIV care and early infant diagnosis (EID). We evaluated the use of HIV infected peer mothers (peers), community lay persons and Village health team (VHT) members to improve PNC follow up and EID in urban and rural health units.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26666331 PMCID: PMC4678627 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1213-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Fig. 1Enrollments, Live deliveries and 6 weeks PNC attendance among study participants
Demographics and Baseline characteristics of women enrolled in the study
| Urban private | Urban free | Rural free | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Mengo | Rubaga | Mulago | Mpigi | |
| Age in yrs, median (IQR) | 26 (7) | 26 (8) | 26 (6) | 27 (7) | 25 (10) |
| Marital status | |||||
| Married/cohabiting | 441 (79.0) | 69 (86.3) | 65 (81.3) | 278 (77.6) | 29 (72.5) |
| Single/separated/widowed | 117 (21.0) | 11 (13.7) | 15 (18.7) | 80 (22.4) | 11 (27.5) |
| Education | |||||
| None/Primary | 280 (50.2) | 18 (22.5) | 32 (40.0) | 201 (56.1) | 29 (72.5) |
| Secondary/Post-secondary | 278 (49.8) | 62 (77.5) | 48 (60.0) | 157 (43.9) | 11 (27.5) |
| Employed | |||||
| Yes | 254 (45.5) | 44 (55.0) | 40 (50.0) | 155 (43.3) | 15 (37.5) |
| No | 304 (54.5) | 36 (45.0) | 40 (50.0) | 203 (56.7) | 25 (62.5) |
| Husband employed (, | |||||
| Employed | 415 (94.1) | 66 (95.6) | 64 (98.5) | 262 (94.2) | 23 (79.3) |
| Un-employed | 26 (5.9) | 3 (4.4) | 1 (1.5) | 16 (5.8) | 6 (20.7) |
| Parity | |||||
| I or II | 217 (39.0) | 37 (46.3) | 41 (51.2) | 124 (34.6) | 15 (37.5) |
| ≥ III | 341 (61.0) | 43 (53.7) | 39 (48.8) | 234 (65.4) | 25 (62.5) |
| Disclosed HIV sero-status | |||||
| Yes | 376 (67.4) | 44 (55.0) | 59 (73.7) | 259 (72.4) | 14 (35.0) |
| No | 182 (32.6) | 36 (45.0) | 21 (26.3) | 99 (27.6) | 26 (65.0) |
| Disclosed HIV sero-status to spouse (among married/co-habiting, | |||||
| Yes | 194 (44.0) | 34 (49.3) | 33 (50.8) | 126 (45.3) | 1 (3.5) |
| No | 247 (56.0) | 35 (50.7) | 32 (49.2) | 152 (54.7) | 28 (96.5) |
| Attending any health clinic/organization giving HIV related services | |||||
| Yes | 435 (78.0) | 50 (62.5) | 67 (83.7) | 303 (84.6) | 15 (37.5) |
| No | 123 (22.0) | 30 (37.5) | 13 (16.3) | 55 (15.4) | 25 (62.5) |
Fig. 2Six-weeks Postnatal visit among women attending PMTCT at the four study site Health units
Factors associated with 6 weeks PNC attendance among women enrolled in the study (N = 511a)
| Attended PNC | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) |
| |
| a) Demographics and baseline factors | |||||
| Age (yrs), mean(SD) | 27 (5.1) | 1.03 (0.98-1.07) | 0.211 | 1.02 (0.98-1.07) | 0.277 |
| Marital status | |||||
| Married/cohabiting | 410 (78.3) | 1 | |||
| Single/separated/widowed | 101 (79.2) | 1.05 (0.61-1.80) | 0.841 | ||
| Education | |||||
| None/Primary | 250 (75.6) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Secondary/Post-secondary | 261 (81.2) | 1.40 (0.91-2.13) | 0.123 | 1.39 (0.89-2.16) | 0.146 |
| Occupation | |||||
| Employed | 236 (82.2) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Un-employed | 275(75.3) | 0.66 (0.43-1.01) | 0.058 | 0.72 (0.46-1.14) | 0.160 |
| Occupation of husband (for married/cohabiting women | |||||
| Employed | 385 (79.7) | 1 | |||
| Un-employed | 25 (56.0) | 0.32 (0.14-0.74) | 0.008 | ||
| Parity | |||||
| One,two | 195 (77.4) | 1 | |||
| ≥ three | 316 (79.1) | 1.10 (0.72-1.70) | 0.654 | ||
| Disclosed HIV sero-status | |||||
| Yes | 342 (79.8) | 1 | |||
| no | 169 (75.7) | 0.79 (0.51-1.22) | 0.291 | ||
| Attending any health clinic/organization giving HIV related services as at enrollment | |||||
| Yes | 401 (79.6) | 1 | |||
| No | 110 (74.6) | 0.75 (0.46-1.23) | 0.259 | ||
| d) Setting | |||||
| Rural (Mpigi) | 35 (62.9) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Urban (Rubaga, Mengo & Mulago) | 476 (79.6) | 2.31 (1.12-4.74) | 0.023 | 2.13 (1.03-4.43) | 0.041 |
aFor 6-weeks PNC visit we considered women who registered live birth, minus infant or maternal death prior to 6 weeks (N = 511)
Only women who attended PNC in the 6 weeks window (5-8weeks) were considered to have attended 6 week PNC visit (401)
In the multivariate analyses we adjusted for age and other variables with P < 0.2 in bivariate analyses
HIV DNA PCR testing for infants up to 14 weeks of age from July 2010 to June 2011
| All HIV-exposed infants at health unitb | Study participants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infants HIV tested/ live birth (%) | Infants HIV tested / live birth, | Infants HIV tested/ live birtha
| HIV positive infants, | Proportional difference in infant HIV testing between study participants and All exposed infants at the hospital | |
| Site | (Baseline) | (Post intervention) | (Post intervention) | % ( | |
| Mengo | 304/374 (81.2) | 439/442 (99.3) | 73/75 (97.3) | 2/75 (2.7) | -2.0 ( |
| Rubaga | 374/506 (73.9) | 437/540 (80.9) | 71/74 (95.9) | 2/74 (2.7) | 15.0 ( |
| Mulago | 1055/2411 (43.7) | 1179/2178 (54.1) | 269/327 (82.3) | 8/327 (2.4) | 28.2 ( |
| Mpigi | 81/96 (84.4) | 83/87 (95.4) | 28/35 (80.0) | 1 /35 (2.9) | -15.4 ( |
| Total | 1814/3387 (53.6) | 2138/3247 (65.8) | 441/511 (86.3) | 13 /511 (2.5) | 20.5 ( |
aFor study participants we considered all registered live birth (whether at study site health unit or anywhere else), less infant or maternal death prior to 6 weeks (N=511)
bFor all HIV-exposed infants at the site health units, live births records were only registered for women delivering at the unit (Information for infant death before 6-weeks was not available)