| Literature DB >> 26666293 |
Noriko Inoguchi1, Kittichai Chaiseeda2, Mamoru Yamanishi3, Moon Ki Kim4, Yunho Jang5,6, Mamta Bajaj7, Catherine P Chia8, Donald F Becker9, Hideaki Moriyama10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase (dUTPase) hydrolyzes dUTP to dUMP and pyrophosphate to maintain the cellular thymine-uracil ratio. dUTPase is also a target for cancer chemotherapy. However, the mechanism defining its substrate affinity remains unclear. Sequence comparisons of various dUTPases revealed that Arabidopsis thaliana dUTPase has a unique tryptophan at position 93, which potentially contributes to its degree of substrate affinity. To better understand the roles of tryptophan 93, A. thaliana dUTPase was studied.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26666293 PMCID: PMC4678481 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1760-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Fig. 1The structure of dUTPase. a The structure of Arabidopsis dUTPase with an inhibitor bound at the active site. The cylinders in each subunit represent only one helix, which contains Ser89 and Trp93. b Each subunit shows five conserved motifs. The five conserved motifs (M1–M5) are highlighted in gray in the holo Arabidopsis dUTPase chain B. c Sequence alignment of dUTPase. The five conserved motifs are indicated by gray shading. Ser89 and Trp93 are boxed. The secondary structure of chain B in the holo Arabidopsis dUTPase, which was identified using DSSP [27], is indicated by the lowercase letters in the top line; ‘e’, β-strand; ‘t’, hydrogen bonded turns; ‘s’, bend; and ‘h’, α-helix. The coordinates of the underlined amino acid residues were not modeled (Table 1). d Estimation of kinetic parameters. Five independent data sets were plotted with different symbols. The inset graph shows the integrated Michaelis–Menten equation fit to the absorbance data shown. The solid line in the figure shows the best-fit line used to estimate the K m value
Comparison of secondary structures and interactions at the ligand-binding site
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDB ID | 4OOP | 3P48 | 2HQU | 1RN8 | 2PY4 |
| Sequence similaritya | Self | 56.2 % | 63.9 % | 35.5 % | 39.2 % |
|
| 0.4 ± 0.1 μM | 13.2 ± 0.6 μM | 3.6 ± 1.9 μM | 0.5 μM | 0.46 ± 0.2 μM |
| α helix 1st res | S89 | S69 | S86 | S72 | S65 |
| α helix 5th res | W93 | V73 | A90 | H76 | T69 |
| α1st–WAT–α5th | Present | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| References | This study | Tchigvintsev et al. [ | Toth et al. [ | Barabas et al. [ | Pecsi et al. [ |
α1st–WAT–α5th refers to the presence of an interaction among the first residue of the α helix, a water molecule, and the fifth residue of the α helix
aSequence similarities between Arabidopsis and each species were calculated by using SIM [28] on the ExPASy server (http://www.expasy.org)
Data collection and structural refinements of Arabidopsis dUTPase
| Parameters | Apo dUTPase | Holo dUTPase |
|---|---|---|
| PDB ID | 4OOQ | 4OOP |
| System | Orthorhombic | Orthorhombic |
| Space group | P212121 | P212121 |
| Unit cell dimensions (Å) | ||
| a | 69.9 | 70.1 |
| b | 70.6 | 70.7 |
| c | 75.0 | 75.1 |
| Data collection | ||
| Wavelength (Å) | 1.542 | 0.978 |
| Resolution (scaling) range (Å) | 20.34–2.00 (2.1–2.0) | 31.97–1.5 (1.55–1.5) |
| No. of observed reflections | 209,897 | 360,703 |
| No. of unique reflections used | 25,874 | 59,499 (5804) |
| | 41.6 (18.5) | 46.4 (8.6) |
| Completeness (%) | 99.2 (98.5) | 95.0 (90.0) |
| Rmerge (%) | 7.6 (17.0) | 7.0 (32.0) |
| Refinement | ||
| Resolution range (Å) | 20.34–2.00 (2.1–2.0) | 31.97–1.5 (1.55–1.5) |
| Rwork (%) | 14.8 | 17.3 |
| Rfree (%) | 19.6 | 20.8 |
| No. of non-hydrogen atoms | 3287 | 3658 |
| No. of water molecules | 345 | 552 |
| RMS deviations from ideal values | ||
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Bond angles (°) | 1.08 | 1.16 |
| Mean B value (Å2) | 22.0 | 20.0 |
| Interpretable residues (out of 166) | ||
| Chain A | 26–156 | 25–157 |
| Chain B | 25–154 | 25–166 |
| Chain C | 26–152 | 26–152 |
Values in parentheses correspond to the highest-resolution shell
Rmerge = Σ|I − 〈 I 〉|/ΣI , where I and 〈 I 〉 are the observed intensity and the mean intensity of the reflection, respectively
Rwork = Σ||Fobs| − |Fcalc||/Σ|Fobs|
Rfree values are collected for a randomly selected 5 % of the data that was excluded from the refinement
Fig. 2The structures of the apo and holo forms of Arabidopsis dUTPase. a Surface presentation of the dUTPase trimer. Circles indicate the active sites. Chains A, B, and C are colored in magenta, cyan, and gray, respectively. b The structure of each active site is composed of three subunits. Each diagram contains a ligand, an α-helix carrying Ser89 and Trp93, and a subunit that provides the C-terminal residues to the active site in a cartoon model. The lengths of the C-termini of the subunits are different. c Apo and holo common water molecules at the active site. Stick models represent the ligand and the ligand-interacting serine residue (S89). d Ligand interaction–replacement by water molecules and amino acids. The water molecules indicated by the arrow are initially associated with the ligand and later potentially replaced with C-terminal amino acids
Fig. 3Interactions between serine 89 and tryptophan 93 in Arabidopsis dUTPase. a Location of the Trp93 side chain in each subunit at different stages of substrate orientation. b Comparison of amino acids in other dUTPases that correspond to Ser 89 and Trp 93 in Arabidopsis dUTPase