| Literature DB >> 26666175 |
Jing-Wen Meng1, Wen Zhu1, Meng-Han He1, E-Jiao Wu1, Guo-Hua Duan1, Ye-Kun Xie1, Yu-Jia Jin1, Li-Na Yang1, Li-Ping Shang1, Jiasui Zhan1,2.
Abstract
Reproductive mode can impact population genetic dynamics and evolutionary landscape of plant pathogens as well as on disease epidemiology and management. In this study, we monitored the spatial dynamics and mating type idiomorphs in ~700 Alternaria alternata isolates sampled from the main potato production areas in China to infer the mating system of potato early blight. Consistent with the expectation of asexual species, identical genotypes were recovered from different locations separated by hundreds of kilometers of geographic distance and spanned across many years. However, high genotype diversity, equal MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 frequencies within and among populations, no genetic differentiation and phylogenetic association between two mating types, combined with random association amongst neutral markers in some field populations, suggested that sexual reproduction may also play an important role in the epidemics and evolution of the pathogen in at least half of the populations assayed despite the fact that no teleomorphs have been observed yet naturally or artificially. Our results indicated that A. alternata may adopt an epidemic mode of reproduction by combining many cycles of asexual propagation with fewer cycles of sexual reproduction, facilitating its adaptation to changing environments and making the disease management on potato fields even more difficult.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26666175 PMCID: PMC4678894 DOI: 10.1038/srep18250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Map showing the geographic locations of the 17 A. alternata populations sampled from China.
Adobe Illustrator Artwork 17.0 software was used to create the map.
Sequence, annealing temperature (T) and fragment size of PCR primers designed to amplify mating type idiomorphs of the fungal pathogen A. alternata.
| Name | Amplification target | Sequence (from 5′to 3′) | T (°C) | Exp. size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | F: GAAGATTTCGTTTCAAGGCTCT | 53 | 661 | |
| R: TATCCCATTGACTGGACATAG | ||||
| B | F: CATGGTCATACTTCCTGATAAC | 53 | 494 | |
| R: CTTCTTTCGCCGACTGTGCA |
Figure 2Polymerase chain reaction amplification of 33 A. alternata isolates from Datong with the two mating type-specific primers.
The primers amplify a ~661 bp unique fragment from isolates carrying MAT1-1 idiomorph and a 494 bp unique fragment from isolates carrying MAT1-2 idiomorph. The first panel is a 100-bp size ladder.
The clone corrected mating type frequencies and their homogeneity tests in 17 the field populations of A. alternata sampled from China between 2011 and 2013.
| Population | Year | Cropping region | Sample size | Frequencies | χ2 test ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Within fields | Among fields | ||||||
| Changde | 2012 | CDR | 23 | 0.39 | 0.61 | 0.40 | |
| Jinan | 2012 | CDR | 50 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.32 | |
| Kaifeng | 2012 | CDR | 50 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 0.20 | |
| Suizhou | 2012 | CDR | 37 | 0.30 | 0.70 | ||
| Chifeng | 2012 | NSR | 52 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.89 | |
| Datong | 2013 | NSR | 17 | 0.35 | 0.65 | 0.33 | |
| Harbin | 2012 | NSR | 48 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.67 | |
| Lü´liang | 2013 | NSR | 7 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 1.00 | |
| Shuangcheng | 2012 | NSR | 35 | 0.40 | 0.60 | 0.31 | |
| Wulanchabu | 2012 | NSR | 16 | 0.37 | 0.63 | 0.45 | |
| Xinzhou | 2013 | NSR | 10 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | |
| Zhangjiakou | 2012 | NSR | 47 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 1.00 | |
| Kunming1 | 2011 | SMR | 51 | 0.55 | 0.45 | 0.58 | |
| Kunming2 | 2012 | SMR | 5 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 1.00 | |
| Qujing | 2011 | SMR | 8 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.72 | |
| Changle | 2011 | SWR | 8 | 0.63 | 0.37 | 0.72 | |
| Fuzhou | 2011 | SWR | 32 | 0.56 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 0.72 |
The hypothesis of 1:1 ratio between MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 within a field population was evaluated evaluaed by a simple χ2 test and heterogeneity in mating type frequencies among field populations and regional populations was evaluated by a contingency χ2 test.
Figure 3Spatial distribution of 253 multilocus genotypes in the 688 A. alternata isolates collected from 17 geographic locations of China between 2011 and 2013.
Tests for gametic equilibrium, genotype diversity, and genetic differentiation between MAT1-1 and MTA1-2 isolates in the 17 field populations of A. alternata collected from China in 2011-2013.
| Population | Sample size | No. Loci | Locus-by -locus | Allele-by -allele | Multilocus association | Clonal fraction | Shannon index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sk | L95 | U95 | |||||||||
| Changle | 13 | 8 | 82.1% | 90.4% | 0.1012 | 2.8539 | 0.27 | 0.84 | 0.21 | ||
| Changde | 24 | 8 | 89.3% | 88.1% | 0.7771 | 2.7499 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.04 | ||
| Chifeng | 80 | 8 | 85.7% | 91.4% | 1.6045 | 0.6952 | 1.7239 | 0.06 (0.103) | 0.32 | 0.87 | 0.01 |
| Datong | 26 | 8 | 89.3% | 86.8% | 2.6213 | 0.7591 | 2.8721 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.08 | |
| Fuzhou | 48 | 8 | 60.7% | 89.0% | 0.8558 | 2.6766 | 0.16 | 0.9 | 0.05 | ||
| Harbin | 76 | 8 | 96.4% | 94.6% | 1.4569 | 0.6757 | 1.5733 | 0.04 (0.162) | 0.35 | 0.85 | 0.02 |
| Jinan | 70 | 8 | 78.6% | 90.0% | 2.0734 | 0.7924 | 2.2879 | 0.11 (0.217) | 0.29 | 0.89 | 0.01 |
| Kaifeng | 80 | 8 | 85.7% | 87.4% | 1.8252 | 0.8681 | 1.9766 | 0.10 (0.059) | 0.31 | 0.87 | 0.02 |
| Kunming1 | 86 | 8 | 82.1% | 90.5% | 1.4661 | 0.7102 | 1.7000 | 0.04 (0.083) | 0.36 | 0.87 | 0.01 |
| Kunming2 | 7 | 8 | 96.4% | 81.3% | 0.1246 | 3.8345 | 0.17 | 0.87 | 0.31 | ||
| Lü´liang | 9 | 8 | 89.3% | 80.3% | 0.2381 | 3.4558 | 0.22 | 0.86 | 0.08 | ||
| Qujing | 8 | 8 | 89.3% | 90.6% | 2.9877 | 0.2081 | 3.2103 | 0.06 (0.192) | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.14 |
| Shuangcheng | 42 | 8 | 64.3% | 84.5% | 0.6544 | 1.9400 | 0.17 | 0.93 | 0.03 | ||
| Suizhou | 52 | 8 | 92.9% | 84.5% | 0.7718 | 1.9806 | 0.23 | 0.91 | 0.05 | ||
| Wulanchabu | 23 | 8 | 100.0% | 96.0% | 0.9908 | 0.2465 | 1.4444 | −0.02 (0.473) | 0.27 | 0.85 | 0.03 |
| Xinzhou | 11 | 8 | 100.0% | 96.7% | 1.2500 | 0.2835 | 1.5914 | −0.01 (0.397) | 0.23 | 0.86 | 0.08 |
| Zhangjiakou | 70 | 8 | 64.3% | 86.8% | 0.8215 | 2.0667 | 0.32 | 0.87 | 0.08 | ||
| Total | 725 | — | 78.4% | 88.1% | 1.3344 | 2.6984 | 0.27 | 0.78 | 0.002 | ||
aClone-corrected sample size was presented in Table 2
bObserved variance of the number of heterozygosity.
cLower 95% confidence limit for the expected variance of the number of heterozygosity under null hypothesis.
dUpper 95% confidence limit for the expected variance of the number of heterozygosity under null hypothesis.
*Indicates that the hypothesis of random association among alleles were rejected at p = 0.05 level.
Nei’s gene diversity and allele number (in parenthesis) of SSR marker loci in the 17 field populations of Alternata alternaria.
| SSR marker locus | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | PAS1 | PAS2 | PAS3 | PAS4 | PAS5 | PAS6 | PAS7 | AD8 |
| Changde | 0.61 (3) | 0.77 (6) | 0.45 (3) | 0.45 (3) | 0.64 (5) | 0.15 (2) | 0.45 (3) | 0.47 (2) |
| Jinan | 0.54 (4) | 0.84 (9) | 0.11 (3) | 0.11 (3) | 0.70 (6) | 0.08 (3) | 0.08 (2) | 0.37 (2) |
| Kaifeng | 0.53 (3) | 0.83 (10) | 0.08 (3) | 0.08 (3) | 0.63 (4) | 0.13 (3) | 0.08 (3) | 0.44 (2) |
| Suizhou | 0.56 (4) | 0.84 (10) | 0.18 (3) | 0.18 (3) | 0.66 (4) | 0.11 (3) | 0.18 (3) | 0.43 (2) |
| Chifeng | 0.45 (3) | 0.86 (14) | 0.14 (3) | 0.14 (3) | 0.68 (5) | 0.10 (3) | 0.14 (3) | 0.14 (2) |
| Datong | 0.60 (3) | 0.86 (8) | 0.29 (2) | 0.29 (2) | 0.56 (4) | 0.21 (3) | 0.29 (2) | 0.48 (2) |
| Harbin | 0.55 (4) | 0.85 (12) | 0.05 (2) | 0.05 (2) | 0.64 (4) | 0.08 (3) | 0.05 (2) | 0.23 (2) |
| Lü´liang | 0.20 (2) | 0.69 (4) | 0.20 (2) | 0.20 (2) | 0.49 (3) | 0.37 (3) | 0.20 (2) | 0.20 (2) |
| Shuangcheng | 0.54 (3) | 0.86 (9) | 0.14 (4) | 0.14 (4) | 0.74 (5) | 0.17 (2) | 0.14 (4) | 0.13 (2) |
| Wulanchabu | 0.45 (3) | 0.79 (8) | 0.00 (1) | 0.00 (1) | 0.57 (3) | 0.08 (2) | 0.00 (1) | 0.08 (2) |
| Xinzhou | 0.47 (2) | 0.70 (5) | 0.00 (1) | 0.00 (1) | 0.46 (3) | 0.14 (2) | 0.00 (1) | 0.26 (2) |
| Zhangjiakou | 0.34 (3) | 0.83 (13) | 0.11 (3) | 0.11 (3) | 0.60 (5) | 0.32 (5) | 0.11 (3) | 0.13 (2) |
| Kunming1 | 0.56 (5) | 0.86 (13) | 0.07 (3) | 0.19 (5) | 0.68 (5) | 0.12 (3) | 0.05 (2) | 0.33 (5) |
| Kunming2 | 0.00 (1) | 0.72 (4) | 0.28 (2) | 0.28 (2) | 0.61 (3) | 0.00 (1) | 0.28 (2) | 0.44 (2) |
| Qujing | 0.00 (1) | 0.75 (5) | 0.41 (3) | 0.22 (2) | 0.41 (3) | 0.22 (2) | 0.22 (2) | 0.47 (2) |
| Changle | 0.73 (4) | 0.64 (4) | 0.74 (5) | 0.74 (5) | 0.00 (1) | 0.46 (2) | 0.74 (5) | 0.40 (2) |
| Fuzhou | 0.73 (6) | 0.80 (8) | 0.69 (5) | 0.68 (5) | 0.44 (5) | 0.54 (3) | 0.69 (5) | 0.52 (3) |
| Average | 190–208 | 235–295 | 189–201 | 197–218 | 238–256 | 216–232 | 156–168 | 123–141 |
| Range | 190–208 | 235–295 | 189–201 | 197–218 | 238–256 | 216–232 | 156–168 | 123–141 |
*Range of fragment size.
Figure 4Phylogenetic relatedness of MAT1-1 (green) and MAT1-2 (red) isolates in the A. alternata population.
(A) UPGMA tree of 25 each MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 isolates randomly selected from the total collection. The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using UPGMA and displayed with NTSYS. (B) Neighbor joining tree of all 688 A. alternata isolates with definite mating type assignments. Nei’s genetic distance was calculated using GENALEX 6.5 and the phylogenetic tree was reconstructed in Mega 5.